Original Research

DOI: 10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00643

A study of ChatGPT in facilitating Heart Team decisions on severe aortic stenosis

Adil Salihu1, MD; David Meier1, MD; Nathalie Noirclerc1, MD; Ioannis Skalidis1, MD; Sarah Mauler-Wittwer1, MD; Frederique Recordon1, BSc; Matthias Kirsch2, MD, PhD; Christan Roguelov1, MD; Alexandre Berger1, MD; Xiaowu Sun3, MSc, PhD; Emmanuel Abbe3, MS, PhD; Carlo Marcucci4, MD; Valentina Rancati4, MD; Lorenzo Rosner4, MD; Emanuelle Scala4, MD; David C. Rotzinger5, MD, PhD; Marc Humbert6, MD; Olivier Muller1, MD, PhD; Henri Lu1,7, MD; Stephane Fournier1, MD, PhD

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Multidisciplinary Heart Teams (HTs) play a central role in the management of valvular heart diseases. However, the comprehensive evaluation of patients’ data can be hindered by logistical challenges, which in turn may affect the care they receive.

AIMS: This study aimed to explore the ability of artificial intelligence (AI), particularly large language models (LLMs), to improve clinical decision-making and enhance the efficiency of HTs.

METHODS: Data from patients with severe aortic stenosis presented at HT meetings were retrospectively analysed. A standardised multiple-choice questionnaire, with 14 key variables, was processed by the OpenAI Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer (GPT)-4. AI-generated decisions were then compared to those made by the HT.

RESULTS: This study included 150 patients, with ChatGPT agreeing with the HT’s decisions 77% of the time. The agreement rate varied depending on treatment modality: 90% for transcatheter valve implantation, 65% for surgical valve replacement, and 65% for medical treatment.

CONCLUSIONS: The use of LLMs offers promising opportunities to improve the HT decision-making process. This study showed that ChatGPT’s decisions were consistent with those of the HT in a large proportion of cases. This technology could serve as a failsafe, highlighting potential areas of discrepancy when its decisions diverge from those of the HT. Further research is necessary to solidify our understanding of how AI can be integrated to enhance the decision-making processes of HTs.

Sign in to read
the full article

Forgot your password?
No account yet?
Sign up for free!

Create my pcr account

Join us for free and access thousands of articles from EuroIntervention, as well as presentations, videos, cases from PCRonline.com

Volume 20 Number 8
Apr 15, 2024
Volume 20 Number 8
View full issue


Key metrics

Suggested by Cory

Editorial

10.4244/EIJ-E-24-00016 Apr 15, 2024
Can artificial intelligence help Heart Teams make decisions?
Koch V
free

10.4244/EIJV15I12A191 Dec 20, 2019
The role of the Heart Team in the planning of aortic valve replacement
Costa G et al
free

10.4244/EIJV16I10A146 Nov 20, 2020
Incorporating patients’ preferences into the Heart Team equation
Vahanian A and Urena M
free

10.4244/EIJV15I10A155 Nov 15, 2019
Heart Team 2.0
Reardon MJ et al
free

Editorial

10.4244/EIJ-E-23-00065 Jan 15, 2024
Aortic stenosis management: current evolution and future challenges
Scotti A and Latib A
free

10.4244/EIJV15I14A217 Feb 20, 2020
Will your Heart Team EXCEL?
Mylotte D and Soo A
free
Trending articles
242.05

State of the art

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-01117 Sep 20, 2022
Recanalisation of coronary chronic total occlusions
Di Mario C et al
free
225.68

State-of-the-Art Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00426 Dec 3, 2021
Myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary artery disease
Lindahl B et al
free
105.78

Expert consensus

10.4244/EIJ-E-22-00018 Dec 4, 2023
Definitions and Standardized Endpoints for Treatment of Coronary Bifurcations
Lunardi M et al
free
77.85

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00840 Sep 2, 2024
Aortic regurgitation: from mechanisms to management
Baumbach A et al
free
68.7

Clinical research

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00545 Sep 20, 2022
Coronary lithotripsy for the treatment of underexpanded stents: the international; multicentre CRUNCH registry
Tovar Forero M et al
free
45.3

Clinical research

10.4244/EIJ-D-18-01126 Aug 29, 2019
New-generation mechanical circulatory support during high-risk PCI: a cross-sectional analysis
Ameloot K et al
free
43.4

Clinical research

10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00590 Dec 4, 2023
Prognostic impact of cardiac damage staging classification in each aortic stenosis subtype undergoing TAVI
Nakase M et al
free
X

The Official Journal of EuroPCR and the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI)

EuroPCR EAPCI
PCR ESC
Impact factor: 7.6
2023 Journal Citation Reports®
Science Edition (Clarivate Analytics, 2024)
Online ISSN 1969-6213 - Print ISSN 1774-024X
© 2005-2024 Europa Group - All rights reserved