Editorial

DOI: 10.4244/EIJ-E-24-00016

Can artificial intelligence help Heart Teams make decisions?

Valentin Koch1,2, MSc

In healthcare, where time is scarce and healthcare professionals have constrained schedules, the use of artificial intelligence (AI) could make healthcare professionals’ lives easier. The integration of AI, in particular advanced language models like Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer (ChatGPT), into medical decision-making processes could help streamline workflows and take some of the burden off healthcare professionals. We examine here a recent study that looks at the use of ChatGPT in augmenting the decision-making processes of Heart Teams in the treatment of severe aortic stenosis. The study suggests a high degree of alignment between ChatGPT and multidisciplinary Heart Teams in the management of severe aortic stenosis, showing how language models could impact healthcare in the future1.

Chat-based AI tools such as ChatGPT are based on large language models (LLMs), a class of models able to process text and output a response tailored towards the request of the user. To train such a model, huge resources in terms of computational power and data are needed, which few companies can afford. As the investment in training such a model is very high, the...

Sign in to read
the full article

Forgot your password?
No account yet?
Sign up for free!

Create my pcr account

Join us for free and access thousands of articles from EuroIntervention, as well as presentations, videos, cases from PCRonline.com

Volume 20 Number 8
Apr 15, 2024
Volume 20 Number 8
View full issue


Key metrics

On the same subject

Original Research

10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00643 Apr 15, 2024
A study of ChatGPT in facilitating Heart Team decisions on severe aortic stenosis
Salihu A et al
free

10.4244/EIJV15I12A191 Dec 20, 2019
The role of the Heart Team in the planning of aortic valve replacement
Costa G et al
free

10.4244/EIJV16I10A146 Nov 20, 2020
Incorporating patients’ preferences into the Heart Team equation
Vahanian A and Urena M
free

10.4244/EIJV16I10A148 Nov 20, 2020
TAVI in patients with reduced life expectancy
Baumbach A and Mullen M
free

Editorial

10.4244/EIJ-E-23-00065 Jan 15, 2024
Aortic stenosis management: current evolution and future challenges
Scotti A and Latib A
free
Trending articles
339.13

State-of-the-Art Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00904 Apr 1, 2022
Antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention
Angiolillo D et al
free
312.48

State-of-the-Art Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00695 Nov 19, 2021
Transcatheter treatment for tricuspid valve disease
Praz F et al
free
295.45

Expert consensus

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00898 Sep 20, 2022
Intravascular ultrasound guidance for lower extremity arterial and venous interventions
Secemsky E et al
free
226.03

State-of-the-Art Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00426 Dec 3, 2021
Myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary artery disease
Lindahl B et al
free
209.5

State-of-the-Art Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-01034 Jun 3, 2022
Management of in-stent restenosis
Alfonso F et al
free
168.4

Expert review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00690 May 15, 2022
Crush techniques for percutaneous coronary intervention of bifurcation lesions
Moroni F et al
free
149.43

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-22-00776 Apr 3, 2023
Computed tomographic angiography in coronary artery disease
Serruys PW et al
free
X

The Official Journal of EuroPCR and the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI)

EuroPCR EAPCI
PCR ESC
Impact factor: 6.2
2022 Journal Citation Reports®
Science Edition (Clarivate Analytics, 2023)
Online ISSN 1969-6213 - Print ISSN 1774-024X
© 2005-2024 Europa Group - All rights reserved