Coronary interventions - Mini focus on optical coherence tomography

Relationship between stent expansion and fractional flow reserve after percutaneous coronary intervention: a post hoc analysis of the DOCTORS trial

EuroIntervention 2021;17:e132-e139. DOI: 10.4244/EIJ-D-19-01103

Salim Belguidoum
Salim Belguidoum1, MD; Nicolas Meneveau2, MD, PhD; Pascal Motreff3, MD, PhD; Patrick Ohlman4, MD, PhD; Mohamed Mehdi Boussaada1, MD; Johanne Silvain5, MD, PhD; Benoit Guillon2, MD; Vincent Descotes-Genon6, MD; Yohann Lefrançois7, MD; Olivier Morel4, MD, PhD; Nicolas Amabile1, MD, PhD
1. Department of Cardiology, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France; 2. Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Jean Minjoz, Besançon, France; 3. Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Gabriel Montpied, and Université d’Auvergne, Clermont Ferrand, France; 4. Department of Cardiology, Nouvel Hôpital Civil, Strasbourg, France; 5. Sorbonne Université, ACTION Study Group, Institut de Cardiologie, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière (AP-HP), Paris, France; 6. Department of Cardiology, Centre Hospitalier, Chambéry, France; 7. Department of Cardiology, Centre Hospitalier, Belfort, France

Background: The best criteria for adequate stent expansion assessment by intracoronary imaging remain debated and their correlation with post-PCI FFR values is unknown.

Aims: This study aimed to analyse the relationship between stent expansion criteria using optical coherence tomography (OCT) analysis and the final PCI functional result.

Methods: This post hoc analysis of the DOCTORS study included non-ST-elevation segment ACS patients undergoing OCT-guided PCI. The procedure functional result was assessed by the measurement of fractional flow reserve (FFR). Stent expansion was assessed on OCT runs according to the DOCTORS criteria and ILUMIEN III criteria.

Results: The study included N=116 patients (age: 60.8±11.5 years; male gender: 71%). The final expansion was considered optimal in 10%, acceptable in 9% and unacceptable in 81% of the stents according to ILUMIEN III criteria, although being successful in 70% of the patients according to the DOCTORS criteria. Hypertension and larger proximal reference segment dimension were independent predictors of inadequate device ILUMIEN III expansion. FFR values were, respectively, 0.93 (0.91-0.95) versus 0.95 (0.92-0.97) in patients with optimal+acceptable versus unacceptable ILUMIEN III expansion (p=0.22), 0.94 (0.91-0.97) versus 0.95 (0.93-0.97) in patients with optimal versus non-optimal DOCTORS expansion (p=0.23), and 0.95 (0.92-0.97) versus 0.92 (0.90-0.95) in patients with minimal stent area ≥4.5 mm2 versus <4.5 mm2 (p=0.03).

Conclusions: In this selected population, no relationship was observed between optimal stent expansion according to ILUMIEN III or DOCTORS OCT criteria and final post-PCI FFR values.

Sign in to read and download the full article

Forgot your password?

No account yet?
Sign up for free!

Create my pcr account

Join us for free and access thousands of articles from EuroIntervention, as well as presentations, videos, cases from

acs/nste-acsfractional flow reserveoptical coherence tomography
Coronary interventionsNSTEMI
Read next article
Identification of the type of stent with three-dimensional optical coherence tomography: the SPQR study

Latest news