Filter no-reflow during percutaneous coronary intervention of saphenous vein grafts: incidence, predictors and effect of the type of protection device

EuroIntervention 2011;7:955-961. DOI: 10.4244/EIJV7I8A151

Italo Porto1*, MD, PhD; Flavia Belloni1, MD, PhD; Giampaolo Niccoli1, MD, PhD; Claudio Larosa1, MD; Antonio Maria Leone1, MD, PhD; Francesco Burzotta1, MD, PhD; Carlo Trani1, MD; Giovanni Luigi De Maria1, MD; Christian Hamilton-Craig2,3, MBBS, FRACP; Filippo Crea1, MD

1. Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy; 2. Centre for Advanced Imaging, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia; 3. University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA

Aims: To assess the main predictors and significance of filter no-reflow (FNR) in protected saphenous vein graft (SVG) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and the ef

Forgot your password?

No account yet? Sign up for free!

Create my pcr account

Join us for free and access thousands of articles from EuroIntervention, as well as presentations, videos, cases from PCRonline.com

saphenous vein graftfilter no-reflowtroponin tdegeneration score

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin

Filter no-reflow during percutaneous coronary intervention of saphenous vein grafts: incidence, predictors and effect of the type of protection device

Read next article

Latest news

Coronary

Valvular disease

Heart failure

Peripheral

Hypertension

Stroke