DOI:

Concept of the central clip: when to use one or two Mitraclips®

Alegria E.1, Chan P.H.1, Syrseloudis D.1, Tavazzi G.1, Price S.1, Lindsay A.C.1, Duncan A.1, Moat N.1, Di Mario C.1, Franzen O.W.2

Pot-pourri

Concept of the central clip: when to use one or two Mitraclips®

Aims: Percutaneous edge-to-edge mitral valve repair with the MitraClip® was shown to be a safe and feasible alternative compared to conventional surgical mitral valve repair. We analyse the concept of the central clip and the predictors of the need for more than one Mitraclip® in our high-risk surgical population with severe mitral regurgitation (MR).

Methods and results: Patients with severe MR (3 or 4+) and high operative risk (as defined by logistic EuroSCORE) declined for conventional mitral valve repair were considered for the MitraClip®. The procedure was performed under general anaesthesia with transoesophageal echocardiographic guidance. Device success was defined as placement of one or more MitraClips® with a reduction of MR to ≤2+. Patients were followed up clinically and with transthoracic echocardiography at one month and at one year. From September 2009 to March 2012, 43 patients with severe MR with a mean age of 74.8±10.7 years (30 males and 13 females; mean log EuroSCORE 24.1±11, mean LVEF 47.5±18.5%; mean±SD) were treated. Median follow-up was 385 days (104-630; Q1-Q3). Device implantation success was 93%. All patients were treated following the central clip concept. Concerning the MR itself, 52.5% was degenerative in aetiology and 47.5% was functional. The degree of MR was reduced from 3.6±0.4 to 1.4±0.6 (p<0.001); NYHA Class improved from 3.1±0.4 to 1.8±0.7 (p<0.001). Nineteen patients (47.5%) received two or more clips. Vena contracta (p<0.001) and the presence of two broad jets (p<0.001) were correlated with the need for a second clip. The presence of a restricted posterior mitral valve leaflet (PML) was inversely correlated with the need for more than one clip (p=0.02). A cut-off value of ≥7.5 mm for vena contracta predicted the need for a second clip (sensitivity 83%, specificity 90%, p=0.01).

Conclusions: The central MitraClip® concept achieved a significant reduction in the degree of mitral regurgitation in the majority of patients treated. The presence of a broad jet (quantified by a vena contracta greater than 7.5 mm) significantly predicted the need for more than one clip.

Volume 8 Supplement Q
Sep 30, 2012
Volume 8 Supplement Q
View full issue


Key metrics

Suggested by Cory

10.4244/EIJV11SWA11 Sep 17, 2015
The MitraClip transcatheter mitral valve repair system
Grasso C and Baldus S
free

10.4244/EIJV7I12A230 Apr 20, 2012
Tools and Techniques: Edge-to-edge percutaneous MitraClip® implantation
Alegria-Barrero E et al
free

10.4244/EIJV9I5A102 Sep 27, 2013
MitraClip® via direct right atrial access in case of a missing inferior vena cava
Frerker C et al
free

MITRAL VALVE INTERVENTIONS

10.4244/EIJV12SYA14 Sep 18, 2016
The MitraClip system: strategies for optimal patient selection and optimised results
Grasso C and Ince H
free

Expert review

10.4244/EIJ-D-20-00883 Nov 20, 2020
Percutaneous mitral valve leaflet repair: ongoing directions and future perspectives
Maisano F and Taramasso M
free

10.4244/EIJV9I10A204 Feb 20, 2014
Concept of the central clip: when to use one or two MitraClips®
Alegria-Barrero E et al
free

IMAGE IN CARDIOLOGY

10.4244/EIJV12I8A173 Oct 10, 2016
Challenging mitral clefts with MitraClip: the convergent clips strategy
Taramasso M and Maisano F
free
Trending articles
151.43

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-22-00776 Apr 3, 2023
Computed tomographic angiography in coronary artery disease
Serruys PW et al
free
55.9

Clinical research

10.4244/EIJ-D-22-00621 Feb 20, 2023
Long-term changes in coronary physiology after aortic valve replacement
Sabbah M et al
free
54.9

Expert review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-01010 Jun 24, 2022
Device-related thrombus following left atrial appendage occlusion
Simard T et al
free
43.75

Clinical Research

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-01091 Aug 5, 2022
Lifetime management of patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis: a computed tomography simulation study
Medranda G et al
free
39.95

Clinical research

10.4244/EIJ-D-22-00558 Feb 6, 2023
Permanent pacemaker implantation and left bundle branch block with self-expanding valves – a SCOPE 2 subanalysis
Pellegrini C et al
free
X

The Official Journal of EuroPCR and the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI)

EuroPCR EAPCI
PCR ESC
Impact factor: 7.6
2023 Journal Citation Reports®
Science Edition (Clarivate Analytics, 2024)
Online ISSN 1969-6213 - Print ISSN 1774-024X
© 2005-2024 Europa Group - All rights reserved