IMAGE IN CARDIOLOGY

DOI: 10.4244/EIJV12I7A151

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: the importance of an experienced multidisciplinary team

María Thiscal López-Lluva*, MD; Alfonso Jurado-Román, MD; Ignacio Sánchez-Pérez, MD; Javier Jiménez-Díaz, MD; Manuel Marina-Breysse, MD; Natalia Pinilla-Echeverri, MD; Jesús Piqueras-Flores, MD; Verónica Hernández-Jiménez, MD; Fernando Lozano-Ruiz-Poveda, MD

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has emerged as a new therapeutic option for patients deemed too high-risk for surgery. A significant learning curve has been reported. Not only the implantation but also the subsequent management are crucial. We present an 83-year-old female with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis and a logistic EuroSCORE of 28%, who underwent successful transfemoral CoreValve® (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA) implantation (Panel A, Moving image 1, Moving image 2). One day after the procedure, she developed a third-degree atrioventricular block. A temporary pacemaker lead was inserted. The procedure was difficult and many intracardiac manipulations were needed. Four hours later, a complete loss of ventricular capture was observed, so she underwent an urgent repositioning. Once again it was difficult and the physician decided to use a subclavian vein access. Minutes later the patient developed symptomatic hypotension, sharp chest pain and dyspnoea. An anteroposterior chest X-ray showed a left pneumothorax with lung collapse (Panel B). Myocardial perforation was also suspected and a bedside echocardiography revealed a large pericardial effusion with signs of tamponade (Panel C). An emergent pericardiocentesis was performed; however, the patient did not improve as expected and a computed tomography scan was done. It showed the drainage catheter inadvertently inserted into the inferior vena cava (Panel D). Despite emergent radioscopically guided repositioning of the catheter, the patient died.

The growing experience with TAVI procedures has increased the implantation success rate and in-cathlab complications are reducing. However, procedure-related complication risks do not end after a successful implantation but rather continue during the post-implantation period. An experienced multidisciplinary team is essential.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Supplementary data

Moving image 1. Angiography of CoreValve position after successful implantation.

Moving image 2. Trivial aortic regurgitation after TAVI.

Supplementary data

To read the full content of this article, please download the PDF.

Angiography of CoreValve position after successful implantation.

Trivial aortic regurgitation after TAVI.

Volume 12 Number 7
Sep 18, 2016
Volume 12 Number 7
View full issue


Key metrics

On the same subject

INTERVENTIONAL FLASHLIGHT

10.4244/EIJ-D-17-00647 Jan 19, 2018
Percutaneous closure of subannular rupture following transcatheter aortic valve implantation
Shah S et al
free

IMAGE IN CARDIOLOGY

10.4244/EIJY15M06_01 Mar 18, 2016
How to overcome a scary complication: a mesh-trapped balloon during a CoreValve® implantation procedure
Bayet G et al
free

Image – Interventional flashlight

10.4244/EIJ-D-20-00748 Jul 20, 2021
Fracture of the delivery catheter system during transcatheter aortic valve implantation
Armario X et al
free

IMAGE IN CARDIOLOGY

10.4244/EIJ-D-16-00347 Feb 3, 2017
Annulus rupture post transcatheter aortic valve implantation complicated by a giant pseudoaneurysm
Thimon T et al
free

Image – Interventional flashlight

10.4244/EIJ-D-19-00826 Sep 18, 2020
ACURATE neo valve perforation after valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve implantation
Rück A et al
free
Trending articles
338.03

State-of-the-Art Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00904 Apr 1, 2022
Antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention
Angiolillo D et al
free
284.93

State-of-the-Art Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00695 Nov 19, 2021
Transcatheter treatment for tricuspid valve disease
Praz F et al
free
226.03

State-of-the-Art Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00426 Dec 3, 2021
Myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary artery disease
Lindahl B et al
free
209.5

State-of-the-Art Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-01034 Jun 3, 2022
Management of in-stent restenosis
Alfonso F et al
free
168.4

Expert review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00690 May 15, 2022
Crush techniques for percutaneous coronary intervention of bifurcation lesions
Moroni F et al
free
150.28

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-22-00776 Apr 3, 2023
Computed tomographic angiography in coronary artery disease
Serruys PW et al
free
118

Translational research

10.4244/EIJ-D-22-00718 Jun 5, 2023
Preclinical evaluation of the degradation kinetics of third-generation resorbable magnesium scaffolds
Seguchi M et al
X

The Official Journal of EuroPCR and the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI)

EuroPCR EAPCI
PCR ESC
Impact factor: 6.2
2022 Journal Citation Reports®
Science Edition (Clarivate Analytics, 2023)
Online ISSN 1969-6213 - Print ISSN 1774-024X
© 2005-2024 Europa Group - All rights reserved