INTERVENTIONAL FLASHLIGHT

DOI: 10.4244/EIJ-D-17-01106

Ad hoc percutaneous paravalvular leak closure after transcatheter aortic valve replacement facilitated by integrated multimodality imaging

Tian-Yuan Xiong1,2, MD; Giuseppe Martucci2, MD; Hind Alosaimi2, MD; Nicolo Piazza2*, MD, PhD

A 91-year-old female with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis (aortic valve area 0.4 cm2, transvalvular mean gradient 77 mmHg) was referred for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). A 26 mm CoreValve® Evolut™ R bioprosthesis (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA) was planned with a perimeter oversizing of 14.6%. A large calcium nodule was noted at the non-coronary cusp on multislice computed tomography (MSCT). Moderate-to-severe paravalvular leak (PVL) was noted on post-deployment aortography. Post-dilation with a 22 mm balloon failed to improve the amount of PVL (Panel A). Considering the significant risk of suboptimal stent apposition and conformability to the surrounding anatomy, even after aggressive post-dilation, and the concern of aortic root perforation/rupture, we chose percutaneous PVL closure to seal the leak.

According to the intraprocedural transoesophageal echocardiogram (TEE), the regurgitant jet was located at the commissure between the left and non-coronary cusps (Panel B). According to the location of the regurgitant jet on the TEE images, we selected an optimal fluoroscopic viewing angle (RAO 46, CAUD 31) for crossing the paravalvular leak after appropriate multiplanar reconstruction of the pre-TAVR MSCT (Panel C-Panel F), using FluoroCT software (Circle Cardiovascular Imaging Inc., Calgary, Canada). The leak was passed with a 0.035-inch J wire, through which an 8 Fr multipurpose guiding catheter crossed the defect. The selected 8 mm AMPLATZER™ Vascular Plug II (St. Jude Medical, St. Paul, MN, USA) was loaded into the delivery system, advanced through the multipurpose guiding catheter and deployed. Position and closure of the leak were confirmed by TEE and angiography. Of note, only 12 minutes were required to analyse the TEE and MSCT images, and cross/plug the PVL.

Percutaneous PVL closure after TAVR is a technically demanding procedure with unpredictable results. Three-dimensional TEE imaging has been shown to benefit such procedures in preprocedural defect sizing, device selection and deployment guidance1. Crossing the PVL defect, however, can still be time-consuming or require exchanges of catheters and guidewires2. The source of these challenges can be difficult anatomies, suboptimal imaging techniques and C-arm angulations. The difficulty in defining the crossing angulation can be easily solved with MSCT while using TEE to identify the location of the defect. Integrated multimodality imaging using echocardiography, MSCT and fluoroscopy was critical to the success of this procedure.

Conflict of interest statement

N. Piazza is a consultant/proctor for HighLife, Medtronic and MicroPort, and is a consultant for Cephea. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Volume 14 Number 5
Aug 3, 2018
Volume 14 Number 5
View full issue


Key metrics

Suggested by Cory

Image – Interventional flashlight

10.4244/EIJ-D-19-00744 Apr 17, 2020
Percutaneous closure of paravalvular leak after transcatheter valve implantation in mitral annular calcification
Leurent G et al
free

Image – Interventional flashlight

10.4244/EIJ-D-19-01122 Oct 9, 2020
The retro-antegrade approach to paravalvular leak closure after transcatheter aortic valve replacement
So C et al
free

Clinical research

10.4244/EIJ-D-22-01110 Aug 7, 2023
Percutaneous paravalvular leak closure after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: the international PLUGinTAVI Registry
Flores-Umanzor E et al
free

10.4244/EIJV12SXA11 May 16, 2016
Catheter-based treatment of paravalvular leaks
Taramasso M et al
free

10.4244/EIJV8SQA9 Sep 30, 2012
Paravalvular leaks: mechanisms, diagnosis and management
Garcia E et al
free

10.4244/EIJV8SQA5 Sep 30, 2012
Mechanisms and prediction of aortic regurgitation after TAVI
Petronio AS et al
free
Trending articles
87.2

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-25-00266 Jan 19, 2026
Lesion stratification with intracoronary imaging
McGarvey M et al
free
47.45

NEW INNOVATION

10.4244/EIJ-D-15-00467 Feb 20, 2018
Design and principle of operation of the HeartMate PHP (percutaneous heart pump)
Van Mieghem NM et al
free
34.8

Original Research

10.4244/EIJ-D-25-01006 Mar 16, 2026
Clinical outcomes and haemodynamic response after blinded stress assessment of moderate aortic stenosis
Eerdekens R et al
22.2

Viewpoint

10.4244/EIJ-D-25-01066 May 4, 2026
Intracoronary imaging guidance for de novo coronary lesion treatment with drug-coated balloons
Amabile N et al
free
20.75

Flashlight

10.4244/EIJ-D-25-01014 Apr 6, 2026
Stent retriever-assisted coronary thrombectomy with continuous aspiration
Liabot Q et al
open access
19.5

Original Research

10.4244/EIJ-D-26-00032 May 15, 2026
Glucocorticoids to reduce permanent pacemaker implantation after TAVI: the GLUCO-TAVI randomised trial
Fuertes-Kenneally L et al
17.8

Expert Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-25-01316 Apr 20, 2026
Electrosurgical laceration and stabilisation of tricuspid edge-to-edge repair: the ELASTA-T technique
Alvarez-Covarrubias H et al
free
X

PCR
Impact factor: 9.5
2024 Journal Citation Reports®
Science Edition (Clarivate Analytics, 2025)
Online ISSN 1969-6213 - Print ISSN 1774-024X
© 2005-2026 Europa Group - All rights reserved