Reply to the letter to the editor

DOI: 10.4244/EIJ-D-22-00879

Reply: What is the Carlino technique?

Carlo Di Mario1, MD, PhD; Kambis A. Mashayekhi2, MD; Roberto Garbo3, MD; Stylianos A. Pyxaras4, MD, PhD; Niccolò Ciardetti1, MD; Gerald S. Werner5, MD, PhD
We thank Drs Carlino and Azzalini for having offered, in their Letter to the Editor1, a detailed description of the rationale, indications and practical application of the Carlino technique that nicely complements the necessarily incomplete summary presented in our State-of-the-Art Review2. Our aim in this paper was to address problems, such as patient selection for chronic total occlusion (CTO) recanalisation, that are of interest to the entire interventional community, and this left limited space for describing the more technical aspects. The letter by Carlino and Azzalini and its accompanying figure highlight the options offered by this technique in antegrade recanalisation. This is a welcome addition because the Carlino technique, often mentioned in talks on CTO, is not standardised and is rarely adopted in the high-volume centres that contribute to large registries. There is still great reluctance from most operators to inject antegradely into the occluded segment because of the risk that an uncontrolled enlargement of the dissection segment would preclude alternative antegrade options. This should always be kept in mind before embarking on this technique. Reports of controlled results and time will help to decide whether the Carlino technique has a role in the treatment of particularly complex CTO lesions.

Conflict of interest statement

C. Di Mario is the recipient of institutional research grants from Amgen, Abbott Vascular, CLS Behring, Boston Scientific, Chiesi Pharmaceuticals, Daiichi Sankyo, Edwards Lifesciences, Medtronic, Shockwave Medical, and Philips Volcano.K. Mashayekhi reports consulting/speaker/proctoring honoraria from Abbott Vascular, Abiomed, Asahi Intecc, AstraZeneca, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, Cardinal Health, Daiichi Sankyo, Medtronic, Shockwave Medical, Teleflex, and Terumo.R. Garbo has received consulting/speaker/proctoring honoraria from Abbott Vascular, Asahi Intecc, Boston Scientific, IMDS, Philips Volcano, Teleflex and Terumo.S.A. Pyxaras reports consulting/speaker/proctorship honoraria from Abiomed, AstraZeneca, Asahi Intecc, and Boston Scientific. Gerald Werner reports speaker honoraria from Asahi Intecc, Bayer, Biotronik, Daiichi Sankyo, Shockwave Medical, Siemens Healthineers, and Terumo. All authors, except N. Ciardetti, are members of the EuroCTO Club that receives annual grants to support its congress and other activities from Abbott, Asahi Intecc, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, Braun, IMDS, OrbusNeich, Philips Volcano, Shockwave, SIS Medical, Teleflex, and Terumo. N. Ciardetti has no conflicts of interest to report.

Volume 18 Number 16
Apr 3, 2023
Volume 18 Number 16
View full issue


Key metrics

On the same subject

Letter to the editor

10.4244/EIJ-D-22-00838 Apr 3, 2023
Letter: What is the Carlino technique?
Carlino M and Azzalini L
free

State of the art

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-01117 Sep 20, 2022
Recanalisation of coronary chronic total occlusions
Di Mario C et al
free

10.4244/EIJV12I11A218 Dec 9, 2016
Conquering CTO revascularisation: the summit is near with 90% of the ascent behind us
Di Mario C and Dini C
free

10.4244/EIJV15I18A286 Apr 3, 2020
Chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention scores: present and future
Vemmou E et al
free

INTERVENTIONAL FLASHLIGHT

10.4244/EIJ-D-17-00532 Jun 20, 2018
Single guiding catheter retrograde CTO recanalisation facilitated by trapping technique: introducing the modified rendezvous technique
Konstantinidis N and Sianos G
free
Trending articles
338.63

State-of-the-Art Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00904 Apr 1, 2022
Antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention
Angiolillo D et al
free
295.45

Expert consensus

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00898 Sep 20, 2022
Intravascular ultrasound guidance for lower extremity arterial and venous interventions
Secemsky E et al
free
226.03

State-of-the-Art Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00426 Dec 3, 2021
Myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary artery disease
Lindahl B et al
free
209.5

State-of-the-Art Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-01034 Jun 3, 2022
Management of in-stent restenosis
Alfonso F et al
free
168.4

Expert review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00690 May 15, 2022
Crush techniques for percutaneous coronary intervention of bifurcation lesions
Moroni F et al
free
149.53

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-22-00776 Apr 3, 2023
Computed tomographic angiography in coronary artery disease
Serruys PW et al
free
103.48

Expert consensus

10.4244/EIJ-E-22-00018 Dec 4, 2023
Definitions and Standardized Endpoints for Treatment of Coronary Bifurcations
Lunardi M et al
free
X

The Official Journal of EuroPCR and the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI)

EuroPCR EAPCI
PCR ESC
Impact factor: 6.2
2022 Journal Citation Reports®
Science Edition (Clarivate Analytics, 2023)
Online ISSN 1969-6213 - Print ISSN 1774-024X
© 2005-2024 Europa Group - All rights reserved