The Official Journal of EuroPCR and the European Association of Percutaneous Coronary Interventions (EAPCI)

Phasic Flow Patterns of Right versus Left Coronary Arteries in Patients Undergoing Clinical Physiological Assessment

DOI: 10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00189

1. Imperial College London, cardiology, London, United Kingdom
2. National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, UK, United Kingdom
3. Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
4. VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
5. Hospital Clínico San Carlos IDISSC and Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
6. Buckinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust, UK
7. Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, Netherlands
8. Department of Cardiology, Amphia Hospital, Breda, the Netherlands
9. Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
10. Department of Cardiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands

As a public service to our readership, this article - peer reviewed by the Editors of EuroIntervention and external reviewers - has been published immediately upon acceptance as it was received in the last round of revision. The content of this article is the responsibility of the authors.

Please note that supplementary movies are not available online at this stage. Once a paper is published in its edited and formatted form, it will be accompanied online by any supplementary movies.

To read the full content of this article, please log in to download the PDF.

Background: Coronary blood flow in humans is known to be predominantly diastolic. Small studies in animals and humans suggest this is less pronounced or even reversed in the right coronary artery (RCA).

Aims: This study aims to characterise the phasic patterns of coronary flow in the left versus right coronary arteries of patients undergoing invasive physiological assessment.

Methods: We analysed data from the Iberian-Dutch-English Collaborators (IDEAL) Study. 482 simultaneous pressure and flow measurements from 301 patients were included in our analysis.

Results: On average, coronary flow was higher in diastole both at rest and during hyperaemia both in the RCA and LCA (mean diastolic-to-systolic velocity ratio (DSVR) was, respectively, 1.85±0.70, 1.76±0.58, 1.53±0.34 and 1.58±0.43 for LCArest , LCAhyp , RCArest and RCAhyp , p<0.001 for between vessel comparisons). Although the type of RCA dominance affected the DSVR magnitude (RCAdom = 1.55 ± 0.35, RCAco-dom =1.40 ± 0.27, RCAnon-dom = 1.35, (SD not reported as n=3), systolic flow was very rarely predominant (DSVR was greater than or equal to 1.00 in 472/482 cases (97.9%) overall), with equal prevalence in the LCA. Stenosis severity or microvascular dysfunction had negligible impact on DSVR in both RCA and LCA (DSVR x hyperaemic stenosis resistance R = 0.018, p=0.03 and DSVR x coronary flow reserve R <0.001, p=0.98).

Conclusions: In patients with coronary artery disease undergoing physiological assessment, diastolic flow predominance is seen in both left and right coronary arteries. Clinical interpretation of coronary physiological data should therefore not differ between the left and the right coronary systems.

Sign in to read and download the full article

Forgot your password?
No account yet? Sign up for free!
Create my pcr account

Join us for free and access thousands of articles from EuroIntervention, as well as presentations, videos, cases from

Read next article
Brachial Arterial Access for PCI: an Analysis of the British Cardiovascular Intervention Society Database