Aims: We sought to compare the diagnostic accuracy of basal stenosis resistance index (BSR), instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) and fractional flow reserve (FFR) for stenosis-specific my
Tim P. van de Hoef1,2*, MD; Martijn Meuwissen1,3, MD, PhD; Javier Escaned4, MD, PhD; Sayan Sen5, MBBS; Ricardo Petraco5, MD; Martijn A. van Lavieren1, MSc; Mauro Echavarria-Pinto4, MD; Froukje Nolte2, MSc; Sukhjinder Nijjer5, MBChB; Steven A.J. Chamuleau6, MD, PhD; Michiel Voskuil6, MD, PhD; Berthe L.F. van Eck-Smit7, MD, PhD; Hein J. Verberne7, MD, PhD; José P.S. Henriques1, MD, PhD; Karel T. Koch1, MD, PhD; Robbert J. de Winter1, MD, PhD; Jos A.E. Spaan2, PhD; Maria Siebes
1. AMC Heart Center, Academic Medical Center – University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; 2. Department of Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Academic Medical Center – University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; 3. Department of Cardio
Sign in to read and download the full articleForgot your password?
No account yet? Sign up for free!Create my pcr account
Join us for free and access thousands of articles from EuroIntervention, as well as presentations, videos, cases from PCRonline.com
basal stenosis resistance indexdiagnostic accuracyfractional flow reservefunctional stenosis severityinstantaneous wave-free ratio
Read next articlePaclitaxel-coated balloon catheter versus paclitaxel-coated stent for the treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis: the three-year results of the PEPCAD II ISR study