IMAGE IN CARDIOLOGY

DOI: 10.4244/EIJV11I6A141

Double atrial septum or redundant Eustachian valve: procedural management during atrial septal defect occlusion

Xavier Freixa1*, MD; Ander Regueiro1, MD; Gustavo Neves de Araujo1, MD; Nelson Leal2, MD; Manel Sabaté1, MD, PhD

The presence of a redundant Eustachian valve (EV) might be difficult to distinguish from a double atrial septum (DAS)1. The EV is generally anterior, whereas a DAS tends to be located posterior and to the left of the inferior vena cava2. We describe the percutaneous closure of an atrial septal defect (ASD) in a patient in whom intraprocedural transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE) showed a possible DAS not detected on previous TEE. Since the operators were not sure if the image corresponded to a redundant EV or a DAS, a pigtail catheter was advanced into the right ventricle (RV). The pigtail deflected the prominent tissue, confirming the diagnosis of a redundant EV (Figure 1). During the ASD occlusion, the pigtail was left inside the RV to avoid any tissue interference with the ASD occluder (Appendix Figure 1). The utility of a pigtail catheter to deflect the EV during percutaneous ASD occlusion has been reported previously. However, our case demonstrates the usefulness of an RV catheter not only to avoid tissue interference during ASD occlusion but also to distinguish between anatomical variations (Figure 1).

Figure 1. Differences between double atrial septum and redundant Eustachian valve. TEE image of the EV deflection with a pigtail (A) precluding any tissue interference with the ASD occluder (B). The insertion of a catheter into the RV changes the septum appearance in a redundant EV (C&D) but not in a DAS (E&F). EV: Eustachian valve; IAC: interatrial chamber; IVC: inferior vena cava; LA: left atrium; RA: right atrium; SVC: superior vena cava.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Supplementary data

Appendix Figure 1. TEE image. The possible DAS (A) was ruled out after deflecting a redundant EV with a pigtail catheter (B).

Volume 11 Number 6
Oct 20, 2015
Volume 11 Number 6
View full issue


Key metrics

Suggested by Cory

State-of-the-Art Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00582 Feb 18, 2022
Echocardiographic guidance in transcatheter structural cardiac interventions
Agricola E et al
free

Clinical Research

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00340 Jan 28, 2022
Transseptal puncture in patients with septal occluder devices during catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation
Guo Q et al
free

10.4244/EIJV7I3A66 Jul 29, 2011
Tools & Techniques: PFO/ASD closure
Pavlovic M et al
free

CLINICAL RESEARCH

10.4244/EIJ-D-15-00344 Dec 20, 2016
Suction catheter for enhanced control and accuracy of transseptal access
Sulkin M et al
free

Expert review

10.4244/EIJ-D-20-00454 Oct 20, 2021
Transseptal puncture: procedural guidance, challenging situations and management of complications
Russo G et al
free
Trending articles
57.8

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00386 Feb 3, 2025
Mechanical circulatory support for complex, high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention
Ferro E et al
free
39.45

Clinical research

10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00725 Nov 19, 2023
A systematic algorithm for large-bore arterial access closure after TAVI: the TAVI-MultiCLOSE study
Rosseel L et al
free
39.45

Original Research

10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00725 Mar 18, 2024
A systematic algorithm for large-bore arterial access closure after TAVI: the TAVI-MultiCLOSE study
Rosseel L et al
free
36.25

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00448 Jan 15, 2024
Coronary spasm and vasomotor dysfunction as a cause of MINOCA
Yaker ZS et al
free
35.15

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00895 Apr 1, 2024
Percutaneous interventions for pulmonary embolism
Finocchiaro S et al
free
28.5

CLINICAL RESEARCH

10.4244/EIJV11I1A6 May 19, 2015
European expert consensus on rotational atherectomy
Barbato E et al
free
22.55

CLINICAL RESEARCH

10.4244/EIJV12I5A93 Aug 5, 2016
Longer pre-hospital delays and higher mortality in women with STEMI: the e-MUST Registry
Benamer H et al
free
X

The Official Journal of EuroPCR and the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI)

EuroPCR EAPCI
PCR ESC
Impact factor: 7.6
2023 Journal Citation Reports®
Science Edition (Clarivate Analytics, 2024)
Online ISSN 1969-6213 - Print ISSN 1774-024X
© 2005-2025 Europa Group - All rights reserved