The Official Journal of EuroPCR and the European Association of Percutaneous Coronary Interventions (EAPCI)
Coronary interventions
Complications and failure modes of coronary microcatheters
Michael Megaly1, MD, MS; Ramy Sedhom2, MD; Ashish Pershad1, MD; Evangelia Vemmou3, MD; Ilias Nikolakopoulos3, MD; Judit Karacsonyi3, MD, PhD; Marwan Saad4, MD, PhD; Amgad Mentias5, MD; Santiago Garcia3, MD; Dimitri Karmpaliotis6, MD; Mohaned Egred7, MD; M. Nicholas Burke3, MD; Emmanouil S. Brilakis3, MD, PhD
1. Banner University Medical Center/University of Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, USA; 2. Albert Einstein Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA; 3. Minneapolis Heart Institute, Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, MN, USA; 4. The Warren Alpert School of Medicine at Brown University, Providence, RI, USA; 5. Roy and Lucille J. Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA, USA; 6. Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA; 7. Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals, NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle, United Kingdom
Introduction
Coronary microcatheters (MCs) are often used in complex and chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)1,2 to facilitate guidewire manipulation and exchanges, and enhance their penetration force. Coronary MCs can be classified as high profile, low profile, angulated, dual lumen, and plaque-modifying1. Despite extensive clinical use, the failure modes of these devices have not been systematically studied. We queried the “Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience” (MAUDE) database for reports on the most commonly used coronary MCs to understand their failure modes better.
Methods
The MAUDE is an online database created by the ...
Coronary microcatheters (MCs) are often used in complex and chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)1,2 to facilitate guidewire manipulation and exchanges, and enhance their penetration force. Coronary MCs can be classified as high profile, low profile, angulated, dual lumen, and plaque-modifying1. Despite extensive clinical use, the failure modes of these devices have not been systematically studied. We queried the “Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience” (MAUDE) database for reports on the most commonly used coronary MCs to understand their failure modes better.
Methods
The MAUDE is an online database created by the ...
Sign in to read and download the full article
Forgot your password? No account yet?
Sign up for free!
Create my pcr account Join us for free and access thousands of articles from EuroIntervention, as well as presentations, videos, cases from PCRonline.com
Coronary interventionsCTO
Read next article
Periprocedural stent thrombosis after percutaneous coronary intervention for a bifurcation lipid-rich plaque
Latest news
NEW ISSUE
The Bifurcation ARC consensus; impact of P2Y12 de-escalation in HBR; 5-year outcomes of the TARGET trial and more...
December 4, 2023
STATE-OF-THE-ART
Free access collection all year long
December 4, 2023
AHEAD OF PRINT
Poor improvement of post-PCI iFR in LAD
FREE ARTICLE - Mitsuaki Matsumura et al
November 30, 2023
AHEAD OF PRINT
Robotic-assisted CABG: clinical outcomes
FREE ARTICLE - Aleksander Dokollari et al
November 23, 2023
AHEAD OF PRINT
Pathophysiological CAD patterns predict outcomes post-PCI
FREE ARTICLE - Nozomi Kotoku et al
November 14, 2023
PCR London Valves 2023
November 16, 2023
AHEAD OF PRINT
Extra-mitral valve cardiac involvement in MR
FREE ARTICLE - Antonio Popolo Rubbio et al
November 9, 2023