2. Albert Einstein Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA
3. Minneapolis Heart Institute, Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, MN
4. The Warren Alpert School of Medicine at Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
5. Roy and Lucille J. Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
6. Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York
7. Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals, NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle, UK
As a public service to our readership, this article - peer reviewed by the Editors of EuroIntervention and external reviewers - has been published immediately upon acceptance as it was received in the last round of revision. The content of this article is the responsibility of the authors.
Please note that supplementary movies are not available online at this stage. Once a paper is published in its edited and formatted form, it will be accompanied online by any supplementary movies.
To read the full content of this article, please log in to download the PDF.
(CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) [1, 2] to facilitate guidewire manipulation and exchanges, and enhance their penetration force. Coronary MCs can be classified as high profile, low profile, angulated, dual lumen, and plaque-modifying . Despite extensive clinical use, the failure modes of these devices have not been systematically studied. We queried the
“Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience” (MAUDE) database for reports on the most commonly used coronary MCs to better understand their failure modes.
Sign in to read and download the full articleForgot your password?
Join us for free and access thousands of articles from EuroIntervention, as well as presentations, videos, cases from PCRonline.com