Coronary interventions

Adverse events with orbital atherectomy: an analytic review of the MAUDE database

EuroIntervention 2020;16:e325-e327. DOI: 10.4244/EIJ-D-19-00295

Nauman Khalid¹, MD; Hasan Javed¹, MD; Toby Rogers¹, MD, PhD; Hayder Hashim¹, MD; Evan Shlofmitz¹, DO; Jason P. Wermers¹, BSc; Yuefeng Chen¹, MD, PhD; Anees Musallam¹, MD; Jaffar M. Khan¹, BM, BCh; Rebecca Torguson¹, MPH; Nelson L. Bernardo¹, MD; Ron Waksman¹, MD

1. Section of Interventional Cardiology, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC, USA

Introduction

Coronary artery calcification (CAC) poses a challenge for successful percutaneous coronary intervention. CAC is associated with worse periprocedural and long-term clinical outcomes because of difficult device delivery and inadequate stent expansion. Atherectomy can effectively ablate and modify calcified plaques, optimising procedural outcomes. The Diamondback 360® Coronary Orbital Atherectomy System (Cardiovascular Systems, Inc., St. Paul, MN, USA) is indicated for lesion preparation of de novo severely calcified coronary lesions before stent implantation. Orbital atherectomy (OA) employs an eccentrically mounted 1.25 mm diamond-coated crown that utilises centrifugal force to orbit at either 80,000 or 120,000 rpm. OA has a unique bidirectional mechanism ...

Forgot your password?

No account yet? Sign up for free!

Create my pcr account

Join us for free and access thousands of articles from EuroIntervention, as well as presentations, videos, cases from PCRonline.com

Coronary interventionsOther coronary interventions

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin