Research Correspondence

DOI: 10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00846

Balloon-expandable versus self-expanding stents in native coarctation of the aorta: three-year results of a randomised controlled trial

Parham Sadeghipour1, MD; Hamid Reza Pouraliakbar1, MD; Melody Farrashi2, MD; Shirin Habibi Khorasani2, MD; Bahram Mohebbi1, MD; Mohammadreza Iranian1, MD; Mohammadreza Babaei1,3, MD; Seyed Mohammad Forouzannia1, MD; Arya Afrooghe1,3, MD; Omid Shafe1, MD; Ata Firouzi4, MD; Faeghe Hosseini4, MD; Ehsan Khalilipur4, MD; Zahra Khajali4, MD; Sedigheh Saedi4, MD; Seifollah Abdi4, MD; Jamal Moosavi1, MD; Stephan Haulon5, MD; Alain Fraisse6, MD

The evidence regarding the mid- and long-term follow-up of transcatheter intervention for coarctation of aorta (CoA) is limited, with the majority of the relevant studies being retrospective in design with small study populations123. Previously, we reported the 1-year results of a randomised controlled trial comparing balloon-expandable stents (BES) and self-expanding stents (SES) in patients with de novo native CoA4. Herein, we have summarised the 3-year follow-up results (IRCT20181022041406N3).

Adult patients with de novo native CoA and no prior history of surgical or endovascular coarctoplasty were included (Central illustration). A structural follow-up, encompassing transthoracic echocardiography and aortic computed tomography angiography was performed at 1- and 3-year follow-up. A supervised exercise test to detect masked hypertension was added to the 3-year follow-up. The main outcomes assessed were the 3-year rates of recoarctation, aortic injuries, and residual hypertension. A detailed description of the eligibility criteria, randomisation, procedural details, and study outcomes has been published previously4 and is summarised in Supplementary Appendix 1, Supplementary Appendix 2 and Supplementary Appendix 3.

Of 92 patients...

Sign in to read
the full article

Forgot your password?
No account yet?
Sign up for free!

Create my pcr account

Join us for free and access thousands of articles from EuroIntervention, as well as presentations, videos, cases from PCRonline.com

Volume 20 Number 9
May 10, 2024
Volume 20 Number 9
View full issue


Key metrics

Suggested by Cory

IMAGE IN CARDIOLOGY

10.4244/EIJ-D-16-00570 Dec 20, 2016
Percutaneous repair of severe coarctation of the aorta
Biswas S et al
free

EXPERT REVIEW

10.4244/EIJV11I6A133 Oct 20, 2015
The effectiveness of stenting of coarctation of the aorta: a systematic review
Hartman E et al
free

Clinical research

10.4244/EIJ-D-18-00923 Mar 20, 2020
Percutaneous reintervention on aortic coarctation stenting
Pan M et al
free

Clinical research

10.4244/EIJ-D-18-00857 Feb 5, 2021
Long-term follow-up after recanalisation of aortic arch atresia
Chessa M et al
free

INTERVENTIONAL FLASHLIGHT

10.4244/EIJ-D-16-00851 Jul 20, 2017
Stenting complex aortic coarctation: simulation in a 3D printed model
Pluchinotta F et al
free

Clinical research

10.4244/EIJ-D-19-00157 Feb 5, 2021
Early and midterm outcomes of bare metal stenting in small children with recurrent aortic coarctation
van Kalsbeek R et al
free
Trending articles
152.9

Clinical research

10.4244/EIJ-D-20-01125 Oct 20, 2021
An upfront combined strategy for endovascular haemostasis in transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation
Costa G et al
free
47.8

NEW INNOVATION

10.4244/EIJ-D-15-00467 Feb 20, 2018
Design and principle of operation of the HeartMate PHP (percutaneous heart pump)
Van Mieghem NM et al
free
39.1

Clinical research

10.4244/EIJ-D-22-00558 Feb 6, 2023
Permanent pacemaker implantation and left bundle branch block with self-expanding valves – a SCOPE 2 subanalysis
Pellegrini C et al
free
X

The Official Journal of EuroPCR and the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI)

EuroPCR EAPCI
PCR ESC
Impact factor: 7.6
2023 Journal Citation Reports®
Science Edition (Clarivate Analytics, 2024)
Online ISSN 1969-6213 - Print ISSN 1774-024X
© 2005-2024 Europa Group - All rights reserved