DOI:

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement for degenerative bioprosthetic surgical valves: results from the global valve-in-valve registry

Dvir D.1,18, Webb J.2, Pasic M.3, Bleiziffer S.4, Waksman R.1, Schaefer U.5, Colombo A.6, Rodés-Cabau J.7, Treede H.8, Hildick-Smith D.9, Descoutures F.10, Walther T.11, Hengstenberg C.12, Nissen H.13, Bekeredjian R.14, Ferrari E.15, Windecker S.16, Brecker S.17, Laborde J.C.17, Kornowski R.18

Risk assesment in TAVI including valve-in-valve

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement for degenerative bioprosthetic surgical valves: results from the global valve-in-valve registry

Aims: Transcatheter aortic valve-in-valve (VIV) implantation is an emerging therapeutic alternative for patients with failed surgical bioprosthesis and may obviate the need for a redo surgery. We aimed to evaluate the clinical results of this technique using a large worldwide registry.

Methods and results: The registry included 416 patients with degenerated aortic bioprosthetic valves (age 77.7±9.7 years; 55.3% men) from 54 cardiac centres. The mode of failure was stenosis (n=168, 40.4%), regurgitation (n=125, 30%), and combined stenosis and regurgitation (n=123, 29.6%). Implanted devices were Edwards SAPIEN (n=225), CoreValve (n=190) and Melody (n=1). Adverse procedural outcomes included 11.1% device malposition and 1.9% ostial coronary obstruction. Post procedure, valve maximum / mean gradients were 28.5±14.3 mmHg / 16.1±9.0, respectively. Independent predictors for high post-procedural gradients (mean ≥20 mmHg) were baseline bioprosthesis stenosis (vs. regurgitation, odds ratio [OR], 6.33, p<0.001) and the use of the Edwards SAPIEN device (OR 2.1, p=0.008). At 30-day follow-up, all-cause mortality was 7.8% and 87.5% of patients were at New York Heart Association functional Class I/II. One-year survival was 82.6%. Using multivariate analysis, the strongest independent predictor for one-year mortality post-VIV was baseline bioprosthesis stenosis (vs. regurgitation, OR 3.7, p=0.003).

Conclusions: The VIV procedure is clinically effective in most patients, with one-year results comparable with other TAVR cohorts. Baseline bioprosthetic stenosis is the strongest predictor for both elevated post-procedural gradients and one-year mortality.

Volume 8 Supplement Q
Sep 30, 2012
Volume 8 Supplement Q
View full issue


Key metrics

Suggested by Cory

10.4244/EIJV9SSA15 Sep 15, 2013
Failing surgical bioprosthesis in aortic and mitral position
Mylotte D et al
free

Clinical research

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00254 Nov 19, 2021
Outcomes of valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve implantation with and without bioprosthetic valve fracture
Brinkmann C et al
free

10.4244/EIJ-E-21-00006 Feb 18, 2022
Valve-in-valve TAVI: the new standard therapy for failing bioprosthetic valves?
Baldus S and Mauri V
free
Trending articles
152.9

Clinical research

10.4244/EIJ-D-20-01125 Oct 20, 2021
An upfront combined strategy for endovascular haemostasis in transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation
Costa G et al
free
47.8

NEW INNOVATION

10.4244/EIJ-D-15-00467 Feb 20, 2018
Design and principle of operation of the HeartMate PHP (percutaneous heart pump)
Van Mieghem NM et al
free
39.1

Clinical research

10.4244/EIJ-D-22-00558 Feb 6, 2023
Permanent pacemaker implantation and left bundle branch block with self-expanding valves – a SCOPE 2 subanalysis
Pellegrini C et al
free
38.95

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00912 Oct 7, 2024
Optical coherence tomography to guide percutaneous coronary intervention
Almajid F et al
free
X

The Official Journal of EuroPCR and the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI)

EuroPCR EAPCI
PCR ESC
Impact factor: 7.6
2023 Journal Citation Reports®
Science Edition (Clarivate Analytics, 2024)
Online ISSN 1969-6213 - Print ISSN 1774-024X
© 2005-2024 Europa Group - All rights reserved