DOI: 10.4244/EIJV9I4A84

Tools and Techniques Clinical: Transcatheter closure of left atrial appendage using the Amplatzer™ Cardiac Plug

Sergio Berti1*, MD; Gennaro Santoro2, MD; Cataldo Palmieri1, MD; Francesco Meucci2, MD

Introduction

In this chapter of Tools & Techniques Clinical, transcatheter closure of left atrial appendage using the Amplatzer™ Cardiac Plug is discussed using a stepwise approach. The following is a summarised overview of this technique. The complete, unabridged version with images is available online at www.eurointervention.org

Background

Since chronic oral anticoagulation cannot be administered in a substantial proportion of patients with atrial fibrillation, the endovascular exclusion of the left atrial appendage (LAA), which represents the source of atrial-derived emboli in the majority of cases, has been proposed as a valuable alternative in selected patients. In this article we briefly summarise the basic steps to perform an effective and safe implantation procedure using the Amplatzer™ Cardiac Plug (ACP; St. Jude Medical, Plymouth, MN, USA).

Methods

First, both cardiac computed tomography and transoesophageal echocardiography should be complementarily performed to study LAA anatomy and size accurately (Figure 1). LAA dimensions must be validated and confirmed during the procedure either by TEE or intracardiac echo (ICE) and angiographic measurements. It is recommended that the Amplatzer™ Cardiac Plug be oversized by about 2 to 3 mm with respect to the LAA measurements. Second, a transseptal puncture, using either the Mullins sheath (Medtronic AVE, Galway, Ireland) or the SL1 sheath (St. Jude Medical, Plymouth, MN, USA), should be performed in the lower part of the fossa ovalis. Third, after the advancement of a marker pigtail catheter (5 Fr, 100 cm long) through the transseptal sheath and the localisation of the pigtail catheter inside the LAA, perform an LAA angiogram to size the LAA ostium and “neck” angiographically. Fourth, prepare the LAA device accurately in a step-by-step fashion (as described in the on-line extended version of the paper) (Figure 2). Fifth, advance the delivery sheath using an Amplatz Super Stiff™, 0.035”×260 cm, short J tip guidewire (Boston Scientific, Natick, MA, USA). Sixth, identify the “landing zone”, i.e., the place where the ACP lobe will be implanted, and carefully unsheath the device until it forms a “ball”. With the device in the “ball” position you can safely manipulate the system in order to prepare for the ACP lobe delivery. Seventh, if the ACP lobe position is satisfactory, unsheath the ACP disc applying some traction to the delivery wire. The goal is to have the lobe of the device completely inside the LAA, with a slight deformation of its body-tyre-shape and with its major axis perpendicular to the major axis of the landing zone. Contrast media injection through the delivery sheath can confirm the correct position of the device and the effectiveness of LAA occlusion. If first attempts are not successful, the device can be safely repositioned at any stage until it is not retracted farther than the radiopaque markers without changing the device or delivery system. Eighth, it is important to verify the device stability before its release, thus keeping the proximal disc on traction for at least three minutes. Ninth, after echocardiographic and fluoroscopic confirmation that the device is correctly in place, it can be released by turning the delivery cable vice counterclockwise (Figure 3). Tenth, a check for pericardial effusion at the end of the procedure is done by transthoracic echo (TTE). We refer to the on-line version of the manuscript for the management of possible periprocedural complications as well as for patient discharge and follow-up. In our experience with the Amplatzer™ Cardiac Plug, implantation is safe and uneventful if performed by a multidisciplinary team and according to a standardised procedure as described in this paper.

Figure 1. A) Transversal projection and 3-D multiplanar measurements; B) Transoesophageal echocardiography measurements of left atrial appendage.

Figure 2. A) Manipulation of the Amplatzer Cardiac Plug device in sterile saline solution by hand to eliminate air bubbles; B) Amplatzer Cardiac Plug – lobe fully retracted within the loader; C) Delivery cable connected to the exposed proximal end screw of the device; D) Pulling of the loading cable to recapture the disc into the loader; E) Flushing of the loader assembly through the haemostatic valve.

Figure 3. A) Angiography of Amplatzer Cardiac Plug – lobe “ball” shape; B) Deployment of Amplatzer Cardiac Plug – lobe; C) Angiography of Amplatzer Cardiac Plug – lobe positioned RAO 40° – caudal 20°; D) Deployment of Amplatzer Cardiac Plug – disc.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no potential conflicts of interest with respect to any companies/organisations whose products or services have been discussed in this article.

Volume 9 Number 4
Aug 23, 2013
Volume 9 Number 4
View full issue


Key metrics

Suggested by Cory

Image – Interventional flashlight

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00624 Jun 3, 2022
Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure in a surgically ligated left atrial appendage
Wong I et al
free

CLINICAL RESEARCH

10.4244/EIJV11I13A292 Apr 20, 2016
Left atrial appendage occlusion with the AMPLATZER Amulet device: an expert consensus step-by-step approach
Tzikas A et al
free

IMAGE IN CARDIOLOGY

10.4244/EIJV12I2A44 Jun 10, 2016
The plug for the appendage
Buellesfeld L et al
free

Image – Interventional flashlight

10.4244/EIJ-D-18-00512 May 20, 2019
A new practical anatomical classification for left atrial appendage closure
Cressa L et al
free

Clinical Research

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00555 Apr 1, 2022
Computed tomography-based selection of transseptal puncture site for percutaneous left atrial appendage closure
Fukutomi M et al
free

10.4244/EIJV12SXA10 May 16, 2016
Left atrial appendage closure: patient, device and post-procedure drug selection
Tzikas A and Bergmann M
free
Trending articles
225.68

State-of-the-Art Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00426 Dec 3, 2021
Myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary artery disease
Lindahl B et al
free
105.78

Expert consensus

10.4244/EIJ-E-22-00018 Dec 4, 2023
Definitions and Standardized Endpoints for Treatment of Coronary Bifurcations
Lunardi M et al
free
77.85

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00840 Sep 2, 2024
Aortic regurgitation: from mechanisms to management
Baumbach A et al
free
68.7

Clinical research

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00545 Sep 20, 2022
Coronary lithotripsy for the treatment of underexpanded stents: the international; multicentre CRUNCH registry
Tovar Forero M et al
free
47.8

NEW INNOVATION

10.4244/EIJ-D-15-00467 Feb 20, 2018
Design and principle of operation of the HeartMate PHP (percutaneous heart pump)
Van Mieghem NM et al
free
45.3

Clinical research

10.4244/EIJ-D-18-01126 Aug 29, 2019
New-generation mechanical circulatory support during high-risk PCI: a cross-sectional analysis
Ameloot K et al
free
X

The Official Journal of EuroPCR and the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI)

EuroPCR EAPCI
PCR ESC
Impact factor: 7.6
2023 Journal Citation Reports®
Science Edition (Clarivate Analytics, 2024)
Online ISSN 1969-6213 - Print ISSN 1774-024X
© 2005-2024 Europa Group - All rights reserved