Coronary interventions - Mini focus on vulnerable plaques

Radial wall strain: a novel angiographic measure of plaque composition and vulnerability

EuroIntervention 2023;18:1001-1010. DOI: 10.4244/EIJ-D-22-00537

Huihong Hong
Huihong Hong1,2, MD; Chunming Li2, BSc; Juan Luis Gutiérrez-Chico3, MD, PhD; Zhiqing Wang1, MD; Jiayue Huang4, MSc; Miao Chu2, PhD; Takashi Kubo5, MD, PhD; Lianglong Chen1, MD, PhD; William Wijns4, MD, PhD; Shengxian Tu1,2, PhD
1. Department of Cardiology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China; 2. Biomedical Instrument Institute, School of Biomedical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China; 3. Department of Cardiology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China; 4. The Lambe Institute for Translational Medicine, The Smart Sensors Laboratory and Curam, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland; 5. Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan

Background: The lipid-to-cap ratio (LCR) and thin-cap fibroatheroma (TCFA) derived from optical coherence tomography (OCT) are indicative of plaque vulnerability.

Aims: We aimed to explore the association of a novel method to estimate radial wall strain (RWS) from angiography with plaque composition and features of vulnerability assessed by OCT.

Methods: Anonymised data from patients with intermediate stenosis who underwent coronary angiography (CAG) and OCT were analysed in a core laboratory. Angiography-derived RWSmax was computed as the maximum deformation of lumen diameter throughout the cardiac cycle, expressed as a percentage of the largest lumen diameter. The LCR and TCFA were automatically determined on OCT images by a recently validated algorithm based on artificial intelligence.

Results: OCT and CAG images from 114 patients (124 vessels) were analysed. The average time for the analysis of RWSmax was 57 (39-82) seconds. The RWSmax in the interrogated plaques was 12% (10-15%) and correlated positively with the LCR (r=0.584; p<0.001) and lipidic plaque burden (r=0.411; p<0.001), and negatively with fibrous cap thickness (r= −0.439; p<0.001). An RWSmax >12% was an angiographic predictor for an LCR>0.33 (area under the curve [AUC]=0.86, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.78-0.91; p<0.001) and TCFA (AUC=0.72, 95% CI: 0.63-0.80; p<0.001). Lesions with RWSmax >12% had a higher prevalence of TCFA (22.0% versus 1.5%; p<0.001), thinner fibrous cap thickness (71 μm versus 101 μm; p<0.001), larger lipidic plaque burden (23.3% versus 15.4%; p<0.001), and higher maximum LCR (0.41 versus 0.18; p<0.001) compared to lesions with RWSmax ≤12%.

Conclusions: Angiography-derived RWS was significantly correlated with plaque composition and known OCT features of plaque vulnerability in patients with intermediate coronary stenosis.

Sign in to read and download the full article

Forgot your password?

No account yet?
Sign up for free!

Create my pcr account

Join us for free and access thousands of articles from EuroIntervention, as well as presentations, videos, cases from

optical coherence tomographyplaque ruptureqca
Read next article
Outcomes of non-ischaemic coronary lesions with high-risk plaque characteristics on coronary CT angiography

Latest news