Qualitative resting coronary pressure wave form analysis to predict fractional flow reserve

EuroIntervention 2019;14:e1601-e1608 published online March 2018. DOI: 10.4244/EIJ-D-17-01149

Mitsuaki Matsumura
Mitsuaki Matsumura1, BS; Akiko Maehara1,2, MD; Nils P. Johnson3, MD, MS; William F. Fearon4, MD; Bernard De Bruyne5, MD, PhD; Keith G. Oldroyd6, MD; Nico H.J. Pijls7,8, MD, PhD; Paul Jenkins1, PhD; Ziad A. Ali1,2, MD, DPhil; Gary S. Mintz1, MD; Gregg W. Stone1,2, MD; Allen Jeremias1,9*, MD, MSc
1. Intravascular Imaging and Physiology Core Laboratory, Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, NY, USA; 2. Department of Cardiology, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital/Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA; 3. Department of Cardiology, McGovern Medical School at UT Health and Memorial Hermann Hospital, Houston, TX, USA; 4. Department of Cardiology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA, USA; 5. Department of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Center Aalst, OLV Clinic, Aalst, Belgium; 6. Department of Cardiology, West of Scotland Heart and Lung Centre, Golden Jubilee Hospital, Clydebank, Scotland, United Kingdom; 7. Department of Cardiology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands; 8. Department of Cardiology, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, the Netherlands; 9. Department of Cardiology, St. Francis Hospital, Roslyn, NY, USA

Aims: The aim of this study was to evaluate the predictability of resting distal coronary pressure wave forms for fractional flow reserve (FFR).

Methods and results: Resting coronary wave forms were qualitatively evaluated for the presence of (i) dicrotic notch, (ii) diastolic dipping, and (iii) ventricularisation. In a development cohort (n=88), a scoring system was developed that was then applied to a validation cohort (n=428) using a multivariable linear regression model to predict FFR and receiver operating characteristics (ROC) to predict FFR ≤0.8. In the development cohort, all three qualitative parameters were independent predictors of FFR. However, in a multivariable linear regression model in the validation cohort, qualitative wave form analysis did not further improve the ability of resting distal coronary to aortic pressure ratio (Pd/Pa) (p=0.80) or instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) (p=0.26) to predict FFR. Using ROC, the area under the curve of resting Pd/Pa (0.86 versus 0.86, p=0.08) and iFR (0.86 versus 0.86, p=0.26) did not improve by adding qualitative analysis.

Conclusions: Qualitative coronary wave form analysis showed moderate classification agreement in predicting FFR but did not add substantially to the resting pressure gradients Pd/Pa and iFR; however, when discrepancies between quantitative and qualitative analyses are observed, artefact or pressure drift should be considered.

Sign in to read and download the full article

Forgot your password?

No account yet?
Sign up for free!

Create my pcr account

Join us for free and access thousands of articles from EuroIntervention, as well as presentations, videos, cases from

clinical researchfractional flow reserveother technique
Coronary interventionsOther coronary interventions
Read next article
Lumen boundaries extracted from coronary computed tomography angiography on computed fractional flow reserve (FFRCT): validation with optical coherence tomography

Latest news