CORONARY INTERVENTIONS

Pressure wire compared to microcatheter sensing for coronary fractional flow reserve: the PERFORM study

EuroIntervention 2018;14:e459-e466 published online May 2018 published online e-edition July 2018. DOI: 10.4244/EIJ-D-18-00064

Ziad Ali
Ziad A. Ali1,2*, MD, DPhil; Yasir Parviz1, MBBS; Matthew Brinkman1, MS; Mitsuaki Matsumura2, BS; Björn Redfors2, MD, PhD; David A. Brogno1, MD; Maria D. Corral2, MD, MS; Khady N. Fall1, MD, MPH; Gary S. Mintz2, MD; Gregg W. Stone1,2, MD; Akiko Maehara1,2, MD; Allen Jeremias2,3, MD, MSc; Ajay J. Kirtane1,2, MD, SM
1. NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital/Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA; 2. Clinical Trials Center, Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, NY, USA; 3. St. Francis Hospital, Roslyn, New York, NY, USA

Aims: Among technologies used to assess FFR, a monorail, sensor-tipped micro pressure catheter (PC) may be advantageous for delivery and re-assessment. We sought to determine whether the

Sign in to read and download the full article

Forgot your password?

No account yet?
Sign up for free!

Create my pcr account

Join us for free and access thousands of articles from EuroIntervention, as well as presentations, videos, cases from PCRonline.com

fractional flow reservepercutaneous coronary interventionstable angina
Coronary interventionsStable CAD
Read next article
Intravascular ultrasound in the evaluation and treatment of left main coronary artery disease: a consensus statement from the European Bifurcation Club

Latest news