Debate

DOI: 10.4244/EIJ-E-24-00033

Percutaneous transvalvular microaxial flow pump is underused in infarct-related cardiogenic shock: pros and cons

Thomas Engstrøm1, MD, DMSc; Jasmine Melissa Madsen1, MD; Holger Thiele2, MD; Uwe Zeymer3, MD

Cardiogenic shock (CS) is among the most feared complications of myocardial infarction and leads to high rates of mortality. Percutaneous transvalvular microaxial flow pumps have emerged as an alternative treatment option in the setting of infarct-related CS, offering an alternative to venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO). The principle behind the use of a percutaneous transvalvular microaxial flow pump is to sustain blood flow in the systemic circulation by pumping blood from the left ventricle to the ascending aorta. However, the use of this device is not exempt from complications, mainly including severe bleeding and peripheral vascular complications. In addition, randomised data on the use of percutaneous transvalvular microaxial flow pumps are limited due to the complexity of the clinical scenario, and the profile of optimal candidates is yet to be defined. Based on current evidence, whether a percutaneous transvalvular microaxial flow pump should be used more in patients presenting with myocardial infarction complicated by CS remains an area of uncertainty

Pros

Thomas Engstrøm, MD, DMSc; Jasmine Melissa Madsen, MD

ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is complicated by its most...

Sign in to read
the full article

Forgot your password?
No account yet?
Sign up for free!

Create my pcr account

Join us for free and access thousands of articles from EuroIntervention, as well as presentations, videos, cases from PCRonline.com

Volume 20 Number 17
Sep 2, 2024
Volume 20 Number 17
View full issue


Key metrics

Suggested by Cory

State-of-the-Art Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-20-01296 Aug 27, 2021
Management of cardiogenic shock
Thiele H et al
free

10.4244/EIJV13I18A344 Apr 6, 2018
Mechanical circulatory support: the last resort in cardiogenic shock?
Thiele H et al
free

Expert review

10.4244/EIJY21M05_01 Jul 20, 2021
Joint EAPCI/ACVC expert consensus document on percutaneous ventricular assist devices
Chieffo A et al
free

10.4244/EIJV10STA12 Aug 19, 2014
Shock management in acute myocardial infarction
Poss J et al
free

NEW INNOVATION

10.4244/EIJ-D-15-00467 Feb 20, 2018
Design and principle of operation of the HeartMate PHP (percutaneous heart pump)
Van Mieghem NM et al
free
Trending articles
151.43

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-22-00776 Apr 3, 2023
Computed tomographic angiography in coronary artery disease
Serruys PW et al
free
55.9

Clinical research

10.4244/EIJ-D-22-00621 Feb 20, 2023
Long-term changes in coronary physiology after aortic valve replacement
Sabbah M et al
free
54.9

Expert review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-01010 Jun 24, 2022
Device-related thrombus following left atrial appendage occlusion
Simard T et al
free
43.75

Clinical Research

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-01091 Aug 5, 2022
Lifetime management of patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis: a computed tomography simulation study
Medranda G et al
free
39.95

Clinical research

10.4244/EIJ-D-22-00558 Feb 6, 2023
Permanent pacemaker implantation and left bundle branch block with self-expanding valves – a SCOPE 2 subanalysis
Pellegrini C et al
free
X

The Official Journal of EuroPCR and the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI)

EuroPCR EAPCI
PCR ESC
Impact factor: 7.6
2023 Journal Citation Reports®
Science Edition (Clarivate Analytics, 2024)
Online ISSN 1969-6213 - Print ISSN 1774-024X
© 2005-2024 Europa Group - All rights reserved