DOI: 10.4244/EIJV8I3A61

Percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy of left atrial appendage thrombus with bilateral neuro-embolic protection followed by closure of left atrial appendage

Syed S. I. Bokhari, MD; Pedro Martinez-Clark*, MD; Juan P. Zambrano, MD; Melissa Tracy, MD; William W. O’Neill, MD

A 76-year-old female with atrial fibrillation was referred for advanced management of severe aortic stenosis. She was enrolled in a trial of percutaneous aortic valve implantation owing to a STS score of 16%. However, she was found to have left atrial appendage thrombus which precluded her from undergoing the procedure per trial protocol. She was started on dabigatran anticoagulation; however, the thrombus persisted. Therefore, we proceeded with mechanical thrombectomy of the left atrial appendage. She was at very high risk of embolic stroke and therefore we used bilateral embolic neuroprotection employing the Mo.Ma® device (Invatec Inc./Medtronic, Bethlehem, PA, USA ) on the right and the SpiderFX® filter device (ev3 Endovascular, Inc., Plymouth, MN, USA) in the left carotid artery. Transseptal puncture was performed and mechanical thrombectomy of the left atrial appendage was performed using an AngioJet® catheter (MEDRAD Inc., Warrendale, PA, USA). Subsequently, the left atrial appendage was closed using a 20-mm ASD occlusion device. The patient had transient bradycardia during the procedure which required a temporary pacemaker. She recovered without any embolic phenomenon. This is the first description of mechanical left atrial appendage thrombectomy. While this technique reduces the risk of cerebral embolisation, the risk of embolism to other vasculature persists. Ideally, an embolic protection device which can capture embolic debris as it exits the aortic valve is desirable.

Figure 1. Left upper corner: fluoroscopic view of 20 mm septal occluder device after deployment in left atrial appendage. Right upper corner: biplane transoesophageal echocardiography images showing device positioned in left atrial appendage. Left lower corner: coronal view, and right lower quadrant: transverse view of post-procedure cardiac CT scan showing that the distal part of the device has assumed a cone shape conforming to the shape of the left atrial appendage and that there is no contrast enhancement of the appendage consistent with occlusion. Arrow points at the device. LA: left atrium

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Online data supplement

Moving image 1. Baseline left atrial appendage angiogram. Initial few beats demonstrate thrombus in left atrial appendage seen as contrast staining. Both the angiogram and live transoesophageal echocardiography were used to define the anatomy of left atrial appendage.

Moving image 2. Left atrial appendage thrombectomy. An Angiojet® catheter is seen in left atrial appendage. Mechanical thrombectomy is being performed.

Moving image 3. Final left atrial angiogram. The Amplatzer device is successfully deployed. There is residual thrombus in the appendage however contrast does not flow in all the way into the appendage (compared to baseline angiogram in Moving image 1) consistent with occlusion. A temporary pacemaker wire is also seen which was placed due to AV block during mechanical thrombectomy with Angiojet®.

Volume 8 Number 3
Jul 27, 2012
Volume 8 Number 3
View full issue


Key metrics

On the same subject

Editorial

10.4244/EIJ-E-24-00010 Apr 15, 2024
Timing of revascularisation in acute coronary syndromes with multivessel disease – two sides of the same coin
Stähli B and Stehli J
free

Editorial

10.4244/EIJ-E-24-00006 Apr 15, 2024
The miracle of left ventricular recovery after transcatheter aortic valve implantation
Dauerman H and Lahoud R
free

Research Correspondence

10.4244/EIJ-D-23-01046 Apr 15, 2024
Feasibility and safety of transcaval venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in severe cardiogenic shock
Giustino G et al

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00836 Apr 15, 2024
Renal denervation in the management of hypertension
Lauder L et al
free

Original Research

10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00643 Apr 15, 2024
A study of ChatGPT in facilitating Heart Team decisions on severe aortic stenosis
Salihu A et al
Trending articles
338.63

State-of-the-Art Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00904 Apr 1, 2022
Antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention
Angiolillo D et al
free
295.45

Expert consensus

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00898 Sep 20, 2022
Intravascular ultrasound guidance for lower extremity arterial and venous interventions
Secemsky E et al
free
226.03

State-of-the-Art Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00426 Dec 3, 2021
Myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary artery disease
Lindahl B et al
free
209.5

State-of-the-Art Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-01034 Jun 3, 2022
Management of in-stent restenosis
Alfonso F et al
free
168.4

Expert review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00690 May 15, 2022
Crush techniques for percutaneous coronary intervention of bifurcation lesions
Moroni F et al
free
149.53

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-22-00776 Apr 3, 2023
Computed tomographic angiography in coronary artery disease
Serruys PW et al
free
103.48

Expert consensus

10.4244/EIJ-E-22-00018 Dec 4, 2023
Definitions and Standardized Endpoints for Treatment of Coronary Bifurcations
Lunardi M et al
free
X

The Official Journal of EuroPCR and the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI)

EuroPCR EAPCI
PCR ESC
Impact factor: 6.2
2022 Journal Citation Reports®
Science Edition (Clarivate Analytics, 2023)
Online ISSN 1969-6213 - Print ISSN 1774-024X
© 2005-2024 Europa Group - All rights reserved