DOI: 10.4244/EIJV8I3A61

Percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy of left atrial appendage thrombus with bilateral neuro-embolic protection followed by closure of left atrial appendage

Syed S. I. Bokhari, MD; Pedro Martinez-Clark*, MD; Juan P. Zambrano, MD; Melissa Tracy, MD; William W. O’Neill, MD

A 76-year-old female with atrial fibrillation was referred for advanced management of severe aortic stenosis. She was enrolled in a trial of percutaneous aortic valve implantation owing to a STS score of 16%. However, she was found to have left atrial appendage thrombus which precluded her from undergoing the procedure per trial protocol. She was started on dabigatran anticoagulation; however, the thrombus persisted. Therefore, we proceeded with mechanical thrombectomy of the left atrial appendage. She was at very high risk of embolic stroke and therefore we used bilateral embolic neuroprotection employing the Mo.Ma® device (Invatec Inc./Medtronic, Bethlehem, PA, USA ) on the right and the SpiderFX® filter device (ev3 Endovascular, Inc., Plymouth, MN, USA) in the left carotid artery. Transseptal puncture was performed and mechanical thrombectomy of the left atrial appendage was performed using an AngioJet® catheter (MEDRAD Inc., Warrendale, PA, USA). Subsequently, the left atrial appendage was closed using a 20-mm ASD occlusion device. The patient had transient bradycardia during the procedure which required a temporary pacemaker. She recovered without any embolic phenomenon. This is the first description of mechanical left atrial appendage thrombectomy. While this technique reduces the risk of cerebral embolisation, the risk of embolism to other vasculature persists. Ideally, an embolic protection device which can capture embolic debris as it exits the aortic valve is desirable.

Figure 1. Left upper corner: fluoroscopic view of 20 mm septal occluder device after deployment in left atrial appendage. Right upper corner: biplane transoesophageal echocardiography images showing device positioned in left atrial appendage. Left lower corner: coronal view, and right lower quadrant: transverse view of post-procedure cardiac CT scan showing that the distal part of the device has assumed a cone shape conforming to the shape of the left atrial appendage and that there is no contrast enhancement of the appendage consistent with occlusion. Arrow points at the device. LA: left atrium

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Online data supplement

Moving image 1. Baseline left atrial appendage angiogram. Initial few beats demonstrate thrombus in left atrial appendage seen as contrast staining. Both the angiogram and live transoesophageal echocardiography were used to define the anatomy of left atrial appendage.

Moving image 2. Left atrial appendage thrombectomy. An Angiojet® catheter is seen in left atrial appendage. Mechanical thrombectomy is being performed.

Moving image 3. Final left atrial angiogram. The Amplatzer device is successfully deployed. There is residual thrombus in the appendage however contrast does not flow in all the way into the appendage (compared to baseline angiogram in Moving image 1) consistent with occlusion. A temporary pacemaker wire is also seen which was placed due to AV block during mechanical thrombectomy with Angiojet®.

Volume 8 Number 3
Jul 27, 2012
Volume 8 Number 3
View full issue


Key metrics

Suggested by Cory

10.4244/EIJV16I13A191 Jan 20, 2021
Smoke signals – do they help to predict TAVI-associated stroke risk?
Kharbanda R and Newton J
free

Focus article

10.4244/EIJY19M08_01 Jan 17, 2020
EHRA/EAPCI expert consensus statement on catheter-based left atrial appendage occlusion – an update
Glikson M et al
free

State-of-the-art

10.4244/EIJ-D-22-00627 Feb 6, 2023
Left atrial appendage occlusion
Holmes D et al
free

IMAGE IN CARDIOLOGY

10.4244/EIJV10I10A199 Feb 20, 2015
Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure in patients with left atrial appendage thrombus
Meincke F et al
free

EXPERT REVIEW

10.4244/EIJ-D-18-00454 Sep 7, 2018
TAVI and the brain: update on definitions, evidence of neuroprotection and adjunctive pharmacotherapy
Lansky AJ et al
free
Trending articles
225.68

State-of-the-Art Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00426 Dec 3, 2021
Myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary artery disease
Lindahl B et al
free
105.78

Expert consensus

10.4244/EIJ-E-22-00018 Dec 4, 2023
Definitions and Standardized Endpoints for Treatment of Coronary Bifurcations
Lunardi M et al
free
77.85

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00840 Sep 2, 2024
Aortic regurgitation: from mechanisms to management
Baumbach A et al
free
68.7

Clinical research

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00545 Sep 20, 2022
Coronary lithotripsy for the treatment of underexpanded stents: the international; multicentre CRUNCH registry
Tovar Forero M et al
free
47.8

NEW INNOVATION

10.4244/EIJ-D-15-00467 Feb 20, 2018
Design and principle of operation of the HeartMate PHP (percutaneous heart pump)
Van Mieghem NM et al
free
45.3

Clinical research

10.4244/EIJ-D-18-01126 Aug 29, 2019
New-generation mechanical circulatory support during high-risk PCI: a cross-sectional analysis
Ameloot K et al
free
X

The Official Journal of EuroPCR and the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI)

EuroPCR EAPCI
PCR ESC
Impact factor: 7.6
2023 Journal Citation Reports®
Science Edition (Clarivate Analytics, 2024)
Online ISSN 1969-6213 - Print ISSN 1774-024X
© 2005-2024 Europa Group - All rights reserved