IMAGE IN CARDIOLOGY

DOI: 10.4244/EIJV10I10A199

Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure in patients with left atrial appendage thrombus

Felix Meincke, MD; Felix Kreidel, MD; Jasper von Wedel, MD; Ulrich Schäfer, MD; Karl-Heinz Kuck, MD; Martin W. Bergmann*, MD

Occlusion of the left atrial appendage (LAA) using the WATCHMAN™ device (Boston Scientific, Natick, MA, USA) proved its safety and efficacy in the PROTECT-AF trial and has found its way into daily clinical routine since then. However, patients with known thrombus formation within the LAA have been excluded from this technique so far because of the high risk of embolisation during the procedure in these patients. We report the first two cases of successful LAA occlusion using the WATCHMAN™ device and cerebral protection systems in patients with known thrombus within the LAA. Both patients were successfully treated with a WATCHMAN™ device without procedural complications. As cerebral protection devices, a SpiderFX™ system (ev3 Endovascular, Inc., Plymouth, MN, USA) was used in the first case and a Claret Medical Montage™ (Claret Medical, Inc., Santa Rosa, CA, USA) for the second patient. We conclude that LAA occlusion with cerebral protection devices is feasible in selected patients with LAA thrombus at high risk for embolic complications.

Figure 1. Patient 1. A) Transoesophageal echocardiographic (TEE) view of the left atrial appendage (LAA) thrombus prior to implantation. B) WATCHMAN™ device after implantation with remaining thrombus in the distal LAA. C) 3D-TEE view of the LAA ostium with thrombus visible within the LAA. D) 3D-TEE after implantation of the WATCHMAN™ device.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Online data supplement

Moving image 1. Angiographic view of the atypical approach for unfolding of the device used in the first patient. The delivery sheath is placed at the ostium of the left atrial appendage (LAA) and the device is unfolded by pushing the device forward into the LAA.

Moving image 2. Transoesophageal echocardiography after implantation of the WATCHMAN™ device in the first patient showing the device position and the thrombus further distal within the left atrial appendage.

Online Figure 1. Patient 2. A) Transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE) prior to implantation with thrombus and “smoke” within the left atrial appendage. B) Angiographic view of the Claret™ system placed in the left carotid artery and the brachiocephalic trunk. C) TEE view of the WATCHMAN™ device after implantation.

Supplementary data

To read the full content of this article, please download the PDF.

Moving image 1.

Moving image 2.

Volume 10 Number 10
Feb 20, 2015
Volume 10 Number 10
View full issue


Key metrics

Suggested by Cory

State-of-the-art

10.4244/EIJ-D-22-00627 Feb 6, 2023
Left atrial appendage occlusion
Holmes D et al
free

10.4244/EIJV12SXA10 May 16, 2016
Left atrial appendage closure: patient, device and post-procedure drug selection
Tzikas A and Bergmann M
free

Focus article

10.4244/EIJY19M08_01 Jan 17, 2020
EHRA/EAPCI expert consensus statement on catheter-based left atrial appendage occlusion – an update
Glikson M et al
free

10.4244/EIJV11I14A307 Apr 8, 2016
Percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion in 2016
Tzikas A et al
free

Image – Interventional flashlight

10.4244/EIJ-D-19-00394 Dec 18, 2020
Double device closure for large or bilobar left atrial appendage anatomy
Alkhouli M et al
free

10.4244/EIJV16I11A163 Dec 4, 2020
WATCHMAN versus AMPLATZER Cardiac Plug: which will prevail?
Saw J and Inohara T
free

CLINICAL RESEARCH

10.4244/EIJY14M07_03 Aug 20, 2015
Double device left atrial appendage closure
Guérios E et al
free
Trending articles
309.93

State-of-the-Art Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00695 Nov 19, 2021
Transcatheter treatment for tricuspid valve disease
Praz F et al
free
166.7

Expert review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00690 May 15, 2022
Crush techniques for percutaneous coronary intervention of bifurcation lesions
Moroni F et al
free
92.2

State-of-the-Art Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-20-01296 Aug 27, 2021
Management of cardiogenic shock
Thiele H et al
free
76

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00840 Sep 2, 2024
Aortic regurgitation: from mechanisms to management
Baumbach A et al
free
72.85

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00386 Feb 3, 2025
Mechanical circulatory support for complex, high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention
Ferro E et al
free
58.3

Clinical research

10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00344 Sep 18, 2023
Clinical outcomes of TAVI with the Myval balloon-expandable valve for non-calcified aortic regurgitation
Sanchez-Luna JP et al
free
56.65

Clinical research

10.4244/EIJ-D-20-01155 Oct 20, 2021
A deep learning algorithm for detecting acute myocardial infarction
Liu W et al
free
33.9

CLINICAL RESEARCH

10.4244/EIJ-D-17-00381 Oct 11, 2017
Stent malapposition and the risk of stent thrombosis: mechanistic insights from an in vitro model
Foin N et al
free
33.65

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00606 Jan 1, 2024
Targeting inflammation in atherosclerosis: overview, strategy and directions
Waksman R et al
free
X

The Official Journal of EuroPCR and the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI)

EuroPCR EAPCI
PCR ESC
Impact factor: 7.6
2023 Journal Citation Reports®
Science Edition (Clarivate Analytics, 2024)
Online ISSN 1969-6213 - Print ISSN 1774-024X
© 2005-2025 Europa Group - All rights reserved