IMAGE IN CARDIOLOGY

DOI: 10.4244/EIJV10I10A199

Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure in patients with left atrial appendage thrombus

Felix Meincke, MD; Felix Kreidel, MD; Jasper von Wedel, MD; Ulrich Schäfer, MD; Karl-Heinz Kuck, MD; Martin W. Bergmann*, MD

Occlusion of the left atrial appendage (LAA) using the WATCHMAN™ device (Boston Scientific, Natick, MA, USA) proved its safety and efficacy in the PROTECT-AF trial and has found its way into daily clinical routine since then. However, patients with known thrombus formation within the LAA have been excluded from this technique so far because of the high risk of embolisation during the procedure in these patients. We report the first two cases of successful LAA occlusion using the WATCHMAN™ device and cerebral protection systems in patients with known thrombus within the LAA. Both patients were successfully treated with a WATCHMAN™ device without procedural complications. As cerebral protection devices, a SpiderFX™ system (ev3 Endovascular, Inc., Plymouth, MN, USA) was used in the first case and a Claret Medical Montage™ (Claret Medical, Inc., Santa Rosa, CA, USA) for the second patient. We conclude that LAA occlusion with cerebral protection devices is feasible in selected patients with LAA thrombus at high risk for embolic complications.

Figure 1. Patient 1. A) Transoesophageal echocardiographic (TEE) view of the left atrial appendage (LAA) thrombus prior to implantation. B) WATCHMAN™ device after implantation with remaining thrombus in the distal LAA. C) 3D-TEE view of the LAA ostium with thrombus visible within the LAA. D) 3D-TEE after implantation of the WATCHMAN™ device.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Online data supplement

Moving image 1. Angiographic view of the atypical approach for unfolding of the device used in the first patient. The delivery sheath is placed at the ostium of the left atrial appendage (LAA) and the device is unfolded by pushing the device forward into the LAA.

Moving image 2. Transoesophageal echocardiography after implantation of the WATCHMAN™ device in the first patient showing the device position and the thrombus further distal within the left atrial appendage.

Online Figure 1. Patient 2. A) Transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE) prior to implantation with thrombus and “smoke” within the left atrial appendage. B) Angiographic view of the Claret™ system placed in the left carotid artery and the brachiocephalic trunk. C) TEE view of the WATCHMAN™ device after implantation.

Supplementary data

To read the full content of this article, please download the PDF.

Moving image 1.

Moving image 2.

Volume 10 Number 10
Feb 20, 2015
Volume 10 Number 10
View full issue


Key metrics

Suggested by Cory

State-of-the-art

10.4244/EIJ-D-22-00627 Feb 6, 2023
Left atrial appendage occlusion
Holmes D et al
free

10.4244/EIJV12SXA10 May 16, 2016
Left atrial appendage closure: patient, device and post-procedure drug selection
Tzikas A and Bergmann M
free

Focus article

10.4244/EIJY19M08_01 Jan 17, 2020
EHRA/EAPCI expert consensus statement on catheter-based left atrial appendage occlusion – an update
Glikson M et al
free

10.4244/EIJV11I14A307 Apr 8, 2016
Percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion in 2016
Tzikas A et al
free

Image – Interventional flashlight

10.4244/EIJ-D-19-00394 Dec 18, 2020
Double device closure for large or bilobar left atrial appendage anatomy
Alkhouli M et al
free

10.4244/EIJV16I11A163 Dec 4, 2020
WATCHMAN versus AMPLATZER Cardiac Plug: which will prevail?
Saw J and Inohara T
free

CLINICAL RESEARCH

10.4244/EIJY14M07_03 Aug 20, 2015
Double device left atrial appendage closure
Guérios E et al
free
Trending articles
202.75

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00089 Jun 11, 2021
Intracoronary optical coherence tomography: state of the art and future directions
Ali ZA et al
free
87.2

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-25-00266 Jan 19, 2026
Lesion stratification with intracoronary imaging
McGarvey M et al
free
47.45

NEW INNOVATION

10.4244/EIJ-D-15-00467 Feb 20, 2018
Design and principle of operation of the HeartMate PHP (percutaneous heart pump)
Van Mieghem NM et al
free
35.3

Original Research

10.4244/EIJ-D-25-01006 Mar 16, 2026
Clinical outcomes and haemodynamic response after blinded stress assessment of moderate aortic stenosis
Eerdekens R et al
26.25

Original Research

10.4244/EIJ-D-25-01370 May 21, 2026
Prognostic value of early haemodynamic valve deterioration after TAVI
Trimaille A et al
26.25

Original Research

10.4244/EIJ-D-25-01370 Jun 1, 2026
Prognostic value of early haemodynamic valve deterioration after TAVI
Trimaille A et al
23.2

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-25-00874 Jun 1, 2026
TAVI and coronary interventions: indications, technical considerations, and clinical scenarios
Aquino Bruno H et al
free
22.2

Viewpoint

10.4244/EIJ-D-25-01066 May 4, 2026
Intracoronary imaging guidance for de novo coronary lesion treatment with drug-coated balloons
Amabile N et al
free
20.75

Flashlight

10.4244/EIJ-D-25-01014 Apr 6, 2026
Stent retriever-assisted coronary thrombectomy with continuous aspiration
Liabot Q et al
open access
X

PCR
Impact factor: 9.5
2024 Journal Citation Reports®
Science Edition (Clarivate Analytics, 2025)
Online ISSN 1969-6213 - Print ISSN 1774-024X
© 2005-2026 Europa Group - All rights reserved