The Official Journal of EuroPCR and the European Association of Percutaneous Coronary Interventions (EAPCI)

Identification of the type of stent with three-dimensional optical coherence tomography: the SPQR study

DOI: 10.4244/EIJ-D-20-00598

1. Klinikum Frankfurt (Oder), Germany
2. San Pedro Hospital, Logroño, Spain
3. Cardiology Department, Campo de Gibraltar Health Trust, Algeciras, Spain
4. Med-X Research Institute, School of Biomedical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
5. Klinikum Fürth, Cardiology Department, Germany
6. Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai, China
7. Medical University, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
8. Kyushu Medical Center, Fukuoka, Japan
9. Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing, China
10. Jilin Heart Hospital, Changchun, China
11. Cardiology Practice, Munich, Germany
12. DRK Klinikum Westend, Berlin, Germany

Disclaimer:

As a public service to our readership, this article - peer reviewed by the Editors of EuroIntervention - has been published immediately upon acceptance as it was received. The content of this article is the sole responsibility of the authors, and not that of the journal or its publishers.

Please note that supplementary movies are not available online at this stage. Once a paper is published in its edited and formatted form, it will be accompanied online by any supplementary movies.

To read the full content of this article, please log in to download the PDF.

Background: The ability of optical coherence tomography (OCT) to identify specific types of stent has never been systematically studied.

Methods and results: A series of 212 consecutive patients with OCT from six international centres were retrospectively screened, finding 294 metallic stents or scaffolds in 146 patients. The sample was analysed by two blinded operators, applying a dedicated protocol in 4 steps to identify the type of stent: 1) 3D and automatic strut detection (ASD), 2) 3D tissue view, 3) Longitudinal view with ASD, 4) Mode “stent only” and ASD. The protocol correctly identified 285 stents (96.9%, kappa 0.965), with excellent interobserver agreement (kappa 0.988). The performance tended to be better in recently implanted stents (kappa 0.993) than in stents implanted ≥3 months before (kappa 0.915), and in pullback speed 18mm/s as compared with 36 mm/s (kappa 0.969 vs. 0.940, respectively).

Conclusion: The type of stent platform can be accurately identified in OCT by trained analysts following a dedicated protocol, combining 3D-OCT, ASD and longitudinal view. This might be clinically helpful in scenarios of device failure and for the quantification of apposition. The blinding of analysts in OCT studies should be revisited.

Sign in to read and download the full article

Forgot your password?
No account yet? Sign up for free!
Create my pcr account

Join us for free and access thousands of articles from EuroIntervention, as well as presentations, videos, cases from PCRonline.com

Read next article
Culprit lesion location and outcomes in patients with multi-vessel disease and infarct-related cardiogenic shock. A core laboratory analysis of the CULPRIT-SHOCK trial