DOI: 10.4244/EIJV9I11A229

First-in-man Portico® transcatheter aortic valve-in-valve implantation in a degenerated 19 mm Mitroflow® aortic pericardial heart valve

Raban V. Jeger1*, MD; Ganesh Manoharan2, MD; Christoph A. Kaiser1, MD

A 79-year-old woman was admitted with dyspnoea NYHA Class III to IV. Five years previously, she had undergone surgical aortic valve replacement (Mitroflow® 19 mm; Sorin S.p.A., Milan, Italy). Transthoracic echocardiography revealed a degenerated bioprosthesis (area 225.7 mm2, perimeter 53.4 mm, area and perimeter derived diameter 17 mm; Figure 1A, Figure 1B) with a severe stenosis (aortic valve area 0.63 cm2), a severe transvalvular and mild paravalvular regurgitation, and a severely reduced left ventricular ejection fraction. Because of her symptomatic valvular heart disease and the high perioperative risk (logistic EuroSCORE 18%), she was referred for transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve-in-valve implantation. Given the specific design of the Mitroflow® valve with its pericardial leaflets mounted outside the stent and the specific anatomy of the patient with a shallow sinus aortae and a low origin of both coronary arteries, the risk of ostial encroachment was deemed substantial. Due to its small size and the unique characteristics of retrievability and resheathability, the decision was made to use a Portico® 23 mm valve (St. Jude Medical Inc., St. Paul, MN, USA; Figure 1C). After the intervention, there was a decrease of the mean aortic gradient from 29 mmHg to 19 mmHg, an increase of the diastolic pressure from 30 mmHg to 51 mmHg, a decrease of the left ventricular filling pressure from 26 mmHg to 21 mmHg (Figure 1D, Figure 1E), an increase of the aortic regurgitation index from 3.5 to 22, and a reduction of aortic regurgitation from grade 3 to 1. The further clinical course was uneventful and the patient was discharged two days later. Three months after the intervention, symptoms improved to NYHA Class II, and transthoracic echocardiography exhibited an unchanged severely impaired left ventricular ejection fraction but a mean aortic gradient of only 18 mmHg with minimal paravalvular aortic regurgitation.

Figure 1. A) Analysis of the degenerated Mitroflow® valve size using EKG-triggered computed tomography and the 3mensio® software. B) Pre-interventional angiography showing the characteristic sewing ring of the Mitroflow® valve in the aortic root. C) Post-interventional angiography of the aortic root with a Portico® transcatheter aortic valve placed in the degenerated Mitroflow® valve. D) Pre-interventional simultaneous measurement of aortic and left ventricular pressures with an aortic regurgitation index of 3.5. E) Post-interventional double pressure haemodynamic tracing with an aortic regurgitation index of 22.

Conflict of interest statement

G. Manoharan is proctor for the manufacturer of the valve, St. Jude Medical. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Online data supplement

Moving image 1. Pre-intervention.

Moving image 2. Post-intervention.

Volume 9 Number 11
Mar 20, 2014
Volume 9 Number 11
View full issue


Key metrics

On the same subject

Editorial

10.4244/EIJ-E-24-00010 Apr 15, 2024
Timing of revascularisation in acute coronary syndromes with multivessel disease – two sides of the same coin
Stähli B and Stehli J
free

Editorial

10.4244/EIJ-E-24-00006 Apr 15, 2024
The miracle of left ventricular recovery after transcatheter aortic valve implantation
Dauerman H and Lahoud R
free

Research Correspondence

10.4244/EIJ-D-23-01046 Apr 15, 2024
Feasibility and safety of transcaval venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in severe cardiogenic shock
Giustino G et al

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00836 Apr 15, 2024
Renal denervation in the management of hypertension
Lauder L et al
free

Original Research

10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00643 Apr 15, 2024
A study of ChatGPT in facilitating Heart Team decisions on severe aortic stenosis
Salihu A et al
Trending articles
338.63

State-of-the-Art Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00904 Apr 1, 2022
Antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention
Angiolillo D et al
free
295.45

Expert consensus

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00898 Sep 20, 2022
Intravascular ultrasound guidance for lower extremity arterial and venous interventions
Secemsky E et al
free
226.03

State-of-the-Art Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00426 Dec 3, 2021
Myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary artery disease
Lindahl B et al
free
209.5

State-of-the-Art Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-01034 Jun 3, 2022
Management of in-stent restenosis
Alfonso F et al
free
168.4

Expert review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00690 May 15, 2022
Crush techniques for percutaneous coronary intervention of bifurcation lesions
Moroni F et al
free
149.53

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-22-00776 Apr 3, 2023
Computed tomographic angiography in coronary artery disease
Serruys PW et al
free
103.48

Expert consensus

10.4244/EIJ-E-22-00018 Dec 4, 2023
Definitions and Standardized Endpoints for Treatment of Coronary Bifurcations
Lunardi M et al
free
X

The Official Journal of EuroPCR and the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI)

EuroPCR EAPCI
PCR ESC
Impact factor: 6.2
2022 Journal Citation Reports®
Science Edition (Clarivate Analytics, 2023)
Online ISSN 1969-6213 - Print ISSN 1774-024X
© 2005-2024 Europa Group - All rights reserved