DOI: 10.4244/EIJV9I11A229

First-in-man Portico® transcatheter aortic valve-in-valve implantation in a degenerated 19 mm Mitroflow® aortic pericardial heart valve

Raban V. Jeger1*, MD; Ganesh Manoharan2, MD; Christoph A. Kaiser1, MD

A 79-year-old woman was admitted with dyspnoea NYHA Class III to IV. Five years previously, she had undergone surgical aortic valve replacement (Mitroflow® 19 mm; Sorin S.p.A., Milan, Italy). Transthoracic echocardiography revealed a degenerated bioprosthesis (area 225.7 mm2, perimeter 53.4 mm, area and perimeter derived diameter 17 mm; Figure 1A, Figure 1B) with a severe stenosis (aortic valve area 0.63 cm2), a severe transvalvular and mild paravalvular regurgitation, and a severely reduced left ventricular ejection fraction. Because of her symptomatic valvular heart disease and the high perioperative risk (logistic EuroSCORE 18%), she was referred for transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve-in-valve implantation. Given the specific design of the Mitroflow® valve with its pericardial leaflets mounted outside the stent and the specific anatomy of the patient with a shallow sinus aortae and a low origin of both coronary arteries, the risk of ostial encroachment was deemed substantial. Due to its small size and the unique characteristics of retrievability and resheathability, the decision was made to use a Portico® 23 mm valve (St. Jude Medical Inc., St. Paul, MN, USA; Figure 1C). After the intervention, there was a decrease of the mean aortic gradient from 29 mmHg to 19 mmHg, an increase of the diastolic pressure from 30 mmHg to 51 mmHg, a decrease of the left ventricular filling pressure from 26 mmHg to 21 mmHg (Figure 1D, Figure 1E), an increase of the aortic regurgitation index from 3.5 to 22, and a reduction of aortic regurgitation from grade 3 to 1. The further clinical course was uneventful and the patient was discharged two days later. Three months after the intervention, symptoms improved to NYHA Class II, and transthoracic echocardiography exhibited an unchanged severely impaired left ventricular ejection fraction but a mean aortic gradient of only 18 mmHg with minimal paravalvular aortic regurgitation.

Figure 1. A) Analysis of the degenerated Mitroflow® valve size using EKG-triggered computed tomography and the 3mensio® software. B) Pre-interventional angiography showing the characteristic sewing ring of the Mitroflow® valve in the aortic root. C) Post-interventional angiography of the aortic root with a Portico® transcatheter aortic valve placed in the degenerated Mitroflow® valve. D) Pre-interventional simultaneous measurement of aortic and left ventricular pressures with an aortic regurgitation index of 3.5. E) Post-interventional double pressure haemodynamic tracing with an aortic regurgitation index of 22.

Conflict of interest statement

G. Manoharan is proctor for the manufacturer of the valve, St. Jude Medical. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Online data supplement

Moving image 1. Pre-intervention.

Moving image 2. Post-intervention.

Volume 9 Number 11
Mar 20, 2014
Volume 9 Number 11
View full issue


Key metrics

Suggested by Cory

Guidelines

10.4244/EIJ-E-21-00009 Feb 4, 2022
2021 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease
Vahanian A et al
free

10.4244/EIJV13I15A280 Feb 2, 2018
Who you gonna call?
Neylon A and Mylotte D
free

10.4244/EIJV9I5A104 Sep 27, 2013
How should I treat severe paravalvular leakage after TAVI?
Reinthaler M et al
free

10.4244/EIJV9I1A25 May 21, 2013
Lesion distribution and intrinsic variability: the challenge to beat the gold standard
van de Hoef TP et al
free

Expert review

10.4244/EIJ-D-19-00818 Nov 15, 2019
Evolving paradigms in valvular heart disease: where should guidelines move?
Baumbach A et al
free

MITRAL VALVE INTERVENTIONS

10.4244/EIJV12SYA25 Sep 18, 2016
Mitral valve-in-valve and valve-in-ring: technical aspects and procedural outcomes
Dvir D and Webb JG
free
Trending articles
87.2

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-25-00266 Jan 19, 2026
Lesion stratification with intracoronary imaging
McGarvey M et al
free
47.45

NEW INNOVATION

10.4244/EIJ-D-15-00467 Feb 20, 2018
Design and principle of operation of the HeartMate PHP (percutaneous heart pump)
Van Mieghem NM et al
free
34.8

Original Research

10.4244/EIJ-D-25-01006 Mar 16, 2026
Clinical outcomes and haemodynamic response after blinded stress assessment of moderate aortic stenosis
Eerdekens R et al
22.2

Viewpoint

10.4244/EIJ-D-25-01066 May 4, 2026
Intracoronary imaging guidance for de novo coronary lesion treatment with drug-coated balloons
Amabile N et al
free
20.75

Flashlight

10.4244/EIJ-D-25-01014 Apr 6, 2026
Stent retriever-assisted coronary thrombectomy with continuous aspiration
Liabot Q et al
open access
19.5

Original Research

10.4244/EIJ-D-26-00032 May 15, 2026
Glucocorticoids to reduce permanent pacemaker implantation after TAVI: the GLUCO-TAVI randomised trial
Fuertes-Kenneally L et al
17.8

Expert Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-25-01316 Apr 20, 2026
Electrosurgical laceration and stabilisation of tricuspid edge-to-edge repair: the ELASTA-T technique
Alvarez-Covarrubias H et al
free
X

PCR
Impact factor: 9.5
2024 Journal Citation Reports®
Science Edition (Clarivate Analytics, 2025)
Online ISSN 1969-6213 - Print ISSN 1774-024X
© 2005-2026 Europa Group - All rights reserved