DOI: 10.4244/EIJV7I8A159

Endovascular extraction of a coronary stent: resolution of a cathlab nightmare

Paulus Kirchhof*, MD; Holger Reinecke, MD

An 82-year-old male patient presented to our department with non-ST-segment myocardial infarction (TIMI score 6). He underwent bypass surgery in 1995. The native proximal circumflex artery had undergone bare metal stenting six months before to treat stable angina (CCS 3).

Emergency angiography identified open venous grafts to the left anterior descending artery, the first diagonal branch, and the right coronary artery (Figure 1). The circumflex artery showed severe proximal in-stent stenosis which was treated by balloon dilatation using up to 18 atm and 3.5 mm diameter balloons. A stent did not pass the lesion and the patient left the table with relevant residual stenosis.

Figure 1. A. Angiographic view of in-stent stenosis in the proximal circumflex artery. B. Trapped rotablator head in the distal portion of the in-stent stenosis. C. Photograph of the rotablator head with the extracted bare-metal stent twisted around it. D. Stent placement, shown during inflation of the stent balloon. E. Final angiographic result. All angiographic images are shown in the “spider view” projection in a caudal left anterior oblique view.

Due to recurrent angina, rotablation of the culprit lesion was performed three days later. After two successful passages of the stenosis with a 1.5 mm rotablator head (160,000 rpm), the rotablator got trapped in the stent. Only submaximal manual force extracted the rotablator head and the guiding catheter. Upon inspection, we found that we had extracted the old stent. Thereafter, we stented the remaining lesion (drug-eluting stent) with a good result. The patient underwent stenting of the LAD bypass due to unstable angina pectoris 10 months after this intervention, with excellent long-term result of the circumflex/left main stent. He is well (CCS 1-2) at 14 months follow-up.

Conflict of interest statement

P. Kirchoff has received honoraria or consultancy fees from 3M Medica/MEDA Pharma, AstraZeneca, Bayer Healthcare, Boehringer Ingelheim, Medtronic, Merck, MSD, Otsuka Pharma, Pfizer / BMS, sanofi-aventis, Servier, Siemens, TAKEDA and received research grants from 3M Medica / MEDA Pharma, Cardiovascular Therapeutics, Medtronic, OMRON, sanofi-aventis, St. Jude Medical, German Federal Ministry for Education and Research (BMBF), Fondation Leducq, German Research Foundation (DFG) and the European Union (EU). H.Reinecke has no conflict of interest to declare.

Volume 7 Number 8
Dec 30, 2011
Volume 7 Number 8
View full issue


Key metrics

On the same subject

Editorial

10.4244/EIJ-E-24-00010 Apr 15, 2024
Timing of revascularisation in acute coronary syndromes with multivessel disease – two sides of the same coin
Stähli B and Stehli J
free

Editorial

10.4244/EIJ-E-24-00006 Apr 15, 2024
The miracle of left ventricular recovery after transcatheter aortic valve implantation
Dauerman H and Lahoud R
free

Research Correspondence

10.4244/EIJ-D-23-01046 Apr 15, 2024
Feasibility and safety of transcaval venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in severe cardiogenic shock
Giustino G et al

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00836 Apr 15, 2024
Renal denervation in the management of hypertension
Lauder L et al
free

Original Research

10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00643 Apr 15, 2024
A study of ChatGPT in facilitating Heart Team decisions on severe aortic stenosis
Salihu A et al
Trending articles
337.88

State-of-the-Art Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00904 Apr 1, 2022
Antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention
Angiolillo D et al
free
283.98

State-of-the-Art Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00695 Nov 19, 2021
Transcatheter treatment for tricuspid valve disease
Praz F et al
free
226.03

State-of-the-Art Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00426 Dec 3, 2021
Myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary artery disease
Lindahl B et al
free
209.5

State-of-the-Art Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-01034 Jun 3, 2022
Management of in-stent restenosis
Alfonso F et al
free
168.4

Expert review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00690 May 15, 2022
Crush techniques for percutaneous coronary intervention of bifurcation lesions
Moroni F et al
free
150.28

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-22-00776 Apr 3, 2023
Computed tomographic angiography in coronary artery disease
Serruys PW et al
free
103.48

Expert consensus

10.4244/EIJ-E-22-00018 Dec 4, 2023
Definitions and Standardized Endpoints for Treatment of Coronary Bifurcations
Lunardi M et al
free
X

The Official Journal of EuroPCR and the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI)

EuroPCR EAPCI
PCR ESC
Impact factor: 6.2
2022 Journal Citation Reports®
Science Edition (Clarivate Analytics, 2023)
Online ISSN 1969-6213 - Print ISSN 1774-024X
© 2005-2024 Europa Group - All rights reserved