Short report

DOI: 10.4244/EIJ-D-19-00225

A transcatheter procedure for direct modification of the aneurysmatic left ventricle

Yan Wang1, MD, PhD; Guosheng Xiao1, MD; Guoming Zhang1, MD; Bin Wang1, MD; Zhi Lin2, MD; Ho David Saiwha1, MD; Hao You2, MD; Keke Lai3, MD; Maolong Su4, MD; Hongmen Wen5, MMSc; Jian Wang1, MMSc; Lon Annest6, MD, PhD; Gary Tse7, MD, PhD

Introduction

Left ventricular aneurysms (LVAs) are found in 10 to 30% of patients suffering from anterior myocardial infarction1. Traditionally, scar reduction has required the use of invasive surgical techniques2. The Surgical Treatment for Ischemic Heart Failure (STICH) trial is a classic trial comparing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) alone with a combined procedure of CABG and surgical ventricular reconstruction3. Currently, catheter-based procedures for direct modification of the left ventricle are represented by the Parachute device (CardioKinetix Inc., Menlo Park, CA, USA) and the Revivent TC™ device (BioVentrix Inc., San Ramon, CA, USA)4,5. We report our single-centre experience and outcomes of 26 patients undergoing the Revivent “Less Invasive Ventricular Enhancement” procedure, which requires no sternotomy, no ventriculotomy, and no extracorporeal or circulatory support.

Methods

THE REVIVENT TC PROCEDURE

The Revivent procedure involves plication and exclusion of the left ventricular (LV) scar using paired micro-anchors. One anchor is implanted surgically into the scarred area of the LV epicardium whilst the other is introduced percutaneously into the right side of the interventricular septum. The most apical aspect of the LV is then excluded. The detailed steps of the procedure are illustrated in Supplementary Figure 1 and Supplementary Appendix 1.

STUDY SUBJECTS, INCLUSION AND EXCLUSION CRITERIA

This is a prospective study of patients who underwent the Revivent TC procedure from January 2017 to January 2019 at a single centre. It has received approval from the Institutional Ethics Committee. All patients provided written informed consent prior to enrolment into this study. The inclusion and exclusion criteria are shown in Supplementary Appendix 1.

Results

From January 2017 to January 2019, 26 patients underwent a Revivent TC procedure (Supplementary Table 1). In the follow-up period, two patients suffered from major adverse cardiac events (MACE), which corresponds to a primary event rate of 7.7%. One was re-hospitalised three times for recurrent heart failure; the other patient died on day 56 from multi-organ system failure.

LEFT VENTRICLE AND LV ANEURYSM DIMENSIONS

As shown in Figure 1A, LV end-diastolic diameters (LVEDD) obtained from the different views were significantly reduced (LVEDD-AP, by echocardiography, 63.6±7.1 to 55.2±7.7 mm, p<0.001), (LVEDD-MA, by cardiac magnetic resonance [CMR], 83.8±10.3 to 73.6±9.9 mm, p<0.001), (LVEDD-LS, by CMR, 61.6±8.7 to 58.4±8.1 mm, p=0.021). LV end-systolic volume (LVESV) (139.5±49.6 to 107.8±43.8 ml), LVSEV index (84.8±25.7 to 65.6±24.4 ml/m²), LV end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) (189.8±57.2 to 158.4±55.0 ml) and LVEDV index (107.8±33.2 to 90.5±31.8 ml/m²) were all significantly reduced (p<0.001). The LV aneurysm end-diastolic diameters measured between the top and bottom of the aneurysm in the two-chamber (LVAEDD2Ch 43.8±12.8 to 32.1±12.4 mm, p<0.001) or four-chamber view (LVAEDD4Ch 40.1±8.8 to 32.2±9.2 mm, p<0.001) and between the neck and the tip of the aneurysm in the four-chamber view (LVAEDD4Ch, neck 41.7±10.6 to 30.1±9.0 mm, p<0.001) by CMR were also significantly reduced.

Figure 1. LV end-diastolic diameter and cardiac function markers pre and post Revivent TC operation. A) LVEDD in different views by echocardiography and CMR. B) LVEF by echocardiography and CMR. C) NT-proBNP and six-minute walking test (6MWT). LVEDD-AL: LV end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD) measured between the anterior and lateral walls in the four-chamber view by CMR. LVEDD-AP: LVEDD measured between the anterior and posterior dimension in the long-axis view on echocardiography; LVEDD-MA: LVEDD measured between the mitral valve and the apex in the four-chamber view by CMR; LVEDD-LS: distance between the lateral wall and the septum on the short-axis view at the papillary muscle level by CMR.

CARDIAC FUNCTION

A series of echocardiographic and CMR examinations was performed at different time points to determine the progression in cardiac function. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), determined by echocardiography and CMR imaging (Figure 1B), was significantly improved (echocardiography: 35.6±8.8% vs 45.9±9.8%, p<0.001; CMR: 28.9±8.3% vs 38.6±10.5%, p<0.001). The six-minute walk test distance was significantly longer (368.8±40.0 to 461.5±61.2 m, p<0.001). There was no change in NT-proBNP (758.6±1,261.1 to 508.4±399.1 pg/ml, p=0.916) (Figure 1C), but New York Heart Association (NYHA) heart failure class was improved at nine months (2.7±0.6 to 1.7±0.7, p<0.001).

Discussion

This study is the largest prospective study published thus far for patients undergoing left ventricular enhancement using the Revivent TC procedure, which is performed on a beating heart without sternotomy, ventriculotomy, or cardiopulmonary bypass. The main findings are that it effectively reduced LVESV, and improved LVEF, with a good safety profile, as well as acceptable complication rates and mortality endpoints. We demonstrate that this procedure can be performed safely by cardiologists with appropriate training. The novelty is the use of CMR for accurate structural and functional characterisation of cardiac function.

All patients successfully received the implantation of the micro-anchors, with a procedural success rate of 100%, and with no device implantation failure. Only two patients suffered from MACE in the follow-up of nine months. With the accumulation of experience, operative time improved from 360 min for the first case to 240 min for the last case, demonstrating the presence of an acceptable learning curve effect for experienced interventional cardiologists and cardiac surgeons.

Limitations

There are several limitations of our study. Firstly, this is an observational study and was not designed to compare outcomes with patients undergoing surgical treatment or receiving only medical therapy. Another limitation is that it is only a single-centre study involving a small number of patients with relatively short follow-up.

Conclusion

The Revivent TC procedure was able to provide significant benefits in terms of left ventricular volume, ejection fraction, six-minute walk test and NYHA heart failure class nine months after the operation. Its long-term efficacy and safety should be confirmed by larger prospective studies with longer follow-up durations.

Impact on daily practice

The Revivent TC procedure is a minimally invasive hybrid operation. It is safe, effective, performed on a beating heart without ventriculotomy or cardiopulmonary bypass, and results in a significantly smaller LV, higher EF and improved function with few adverse events.

Funding

The study was funded by research grants from the Xiamen Health Commission (3502Z20179049), Xiamen Science and Technology Bureau (3502Z20151041) and Fujian province (2016-CXB-13).

Conflict of interest statement

L. Annest is an employee of the BioVentrix company. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Supplementary data

To read the full content of this article, please download the PDF.

Volume 16 Number 18
Apr 2, 2021
Volume 16 Number 18
View full issue


Key metrics

Suggested by Cory

Expert review

10.4244/EIJ-D-22-00544 Apr 24, 2023
Transcatheter left ventriculoplasty
Spilias N et al
free

SHORT REPORT

10.4244/EIJ-D-17-00413 Mar 20, 2018
Hybrid transcatheter left ventricular reconstruction for the treatment of ischaemic cardiomyopathy
Zivelonghi C et al
free

SPECIAL REPORT

10.4244/EIJY15M09_05 Oct 20, 2015
Transseptal and transmitral Parachute® implantation in conjunction with “MitraClipping”
Schäfer U et al
free

10.4244/EIJV16I13A190 Jan 20, 2021
Moving (re-shaping) the mitral annulus
Nickenig G and Becher M
free

State-of-the-art

10.4244/EIJ-D-22-00070 Feb 20, 2023
Transcatheter interventions for heart failure
Latib A et al
free

10.4244/EIJV9I2A29 Jun 28, 2013
Less invasive partial circulatory support: concept versus clinical utility
Westaby S
free
Trending articles
151.43

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-22-00776 Apr 3, 2023
Computed tomographic angiography in coronary artery disease
Serruys PW et al
free
55.9

Clinical research

10.4244/EIJ-D-22-00621 Feb 20, 2023
Long-term changes in coronary physiology after aortic valve replacement
Sabbah M et al
free
54.9

Expert review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-01010 Jun 24, 2022
Device-related thrombus following left atrial appendage occlusion
Simard T et al
free
43.75

Clinical Research

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-01091 Aug 5, 2022
Lifetime management of patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis: a computed tomography simulation study
Medranda G et al
free
39.95

Clinical research

10.4244/EIJ-D-22-00558 Feb 6, 2023
Permanent pacemaker implantation and left bundle branch block with self-expanding valves – a SCOPE 2 subanalysis
Pellegrini C et al
free
X

The Official Journal of EuroPCR and the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI)

EuroPCR EAPCI
PCR ESC
Impact factor: 7.6
2023 Journal Citation Reports®
Science Edition (Clarivate Analytics, 2024)
Online ISSN 1969-6213 - Print ISSN 1774-024X
© 2005-2024 Europa Group - All rights reserved