Research correspondence

DOI: 10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00369

Direct wire pacing for transcatheter mitral valve replacement

Clément Servoz1, MD; Jérôme Wintzer-Wehekind2,3, MD; Jean-Michel Paradis4, MD; Didier Champagnac3, MD; Gaetan Charbonnier5, MD; Julio Farjat-Pasos4, MD; Mohamed Abdellaoui2,3, MD; Nicolas Dumonteil5, MD; Benjamin Faurie2,3, MD

Failure after mitral annuloplasty or replacement is one of the long-term complications after mitral surgery. Reoperation in this frail population is associated with high postoperative mortality and morbidity1. Transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) procedures, including mitral valve-in-valve (ViV), valve-in-ring (ViR) and valve-in-mitral annular calcification (ViMAC), have recently emerged as off-label alternative therapies for prosthesis dysfunction and severe mitral calcification2. Even though TMVR without rapid pacing has been successfully performed, it can improve valve stability and so optimises deployment and valve positioning. Temporary right ventricle pacing (RVP) is potentially associated with vascular and ventricular complications such as perforations and tamponades. Transcatheter procedures have undergone significant simplifications that have improved intervention duration, complication rates and patient outcomes particularly in this high-risk population. Direct wire pacing (DWP), as with direct left ventricular (LV) pacing in transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), has been shown to be as efficient as RVP. Procedural cost, duration and fluoroscopy time were significantly lower in the DWP group compared to the RVP group in TAVR3. Similarly to TAVR, we sought to simplify TMVR procedures without sacrificing...

Sign in to read
the full article

Forgot your password?
No account yet?
Sign up for free!

Create my pcr account

Join us for free and access thousands of articles from EuroIntervention, as well as presentations, videos, cases from PCRonline.com

Volume 19 Number 9
Nov 17, 2023
Volume 19 Number 9
View full issue


Key metrics

Suggested by Cory

Image – Interventional flashlight

10.4244/EIJ-D-19-00138 Aug 9, 2019
Early experience with a purpose-designed temporary pacing guidewire for transcatheter valve implantation
Hensey M et al
free

EXPERT REVIEW

10.4244/EIJ-D-17-00571 Sep 24, 2017
The big parade: emerging percutaneous mitral and tricuspid valve devices
Natarajan D et al
free

SPECIAL REPORT

10.4244/EIJY15M07_05 Apr 20, 2016
Direct Flow valve-in-valve implantation in a degenerated mitral bioprosthesis
Bruschi G et al
free

INTERVENTIONAL FLASHLIGHT

10.4244/EIJ-D-17-00164 Jun 20, 2017
First transjugular edge-to-edge mitral valve repair with the MitraClip system
Fam N et al
free

10.4244/EIJV11SWA10 Sep 17, 2015
Transcatheter mitral valve repair: a brief review
Barbanti M et al
free
Trending articles
151.43

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-22-00776 Apr 3, 2023
Computed tomographic angiography in coronary artery disease
Serruys PW et al
free
55.9

Clinical research

10.4244/EIJ-D-22-00621 Feb 20, 2023
Long-term changes in coronary physiology after aortic valve replacement
Sabbah M et al
free
54.9

Expert review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-01010 Jun 24, 2022
Device-related thrombus following left atrial appendage occlusion
Simard T et al
free
43.75

Clinical Research

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-01091 Aug 5, 2022
Lifetime management of patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis: a computed tomography simulation study
Medranda G et al
free
39.95

Clinical research

10.4244/EIJ-D-22-00558 Feb 6, 2023
Permanent pacemaker implantation and left bundle branch block with self-expanding valves – a SCOPE 2 subanalysis
Pellegrini C et al
free
X

The Official Journal of EuroPCR and the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI)

EuroPCR EAPCI
PCR ESC
Impact factor: 7.6
2023 Journal Citation Reports®
Science Edition (Clarivate Analytics, 2024)
Online ISSN 1969-6213 - Print ISSN 1774-024X
© 2005-2024 Europa Group - All rights reserved