Coronary interventions - Mini focus on coronary physiology

Clinical outcomes of fractional flow reserve-guided percutaneous coronary intervention by coronary flow capacity status in stable lesions

EuroIntervention 2021;17:e301-e308. DOI: 10.4244/EIJ-D-20-00401

Rikuta Hamaya
Rikuta Hamaya1,2, MD, MSc; Joo Myung Lee3, MD, MPH, PhD; Masahiro Hoshino1, MD; Taishi Yonetsu4, MD; Bon-Kwon Koo5,6, MD, PhD; Javier Escaned7,8, MD, PhD; Tsunekazu Kakuta1, MD, PhD
1. Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Tsuchiura Kyodo General Hospital, Ibaraki, Japan; 2. Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA; 3. Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Heart Vascular Stroke Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; 4. Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan; 5. Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiovascular Center, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; 6. Institute on Aging, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea; 7. Cardiovascular Institute, Hospital Clinico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain; 8. Centro Nacional de Investigaciónes Cardiovasculares Carlos III (CNIC), Madrid, Spain

Background: Coronary flow capacity (CFC) provides integrated information about coronary flow reserve (CFR) and hyperaemic coronary flow and is useful for identifying coronary flow limitation.

Aims: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) on vessel-related major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) according to CFC status in stable coronary lesions.

Methods: From a global, multicentre registry of comprehensive physiological assessment, a total of 1,397 patients (1,694 vessels) were analysed. Low CFC was defined for lesions with reduced CFR and inverse of hyperaemic mean transit time (1/hTmn). A predefined definition of CFC (CFR <2.0 and 1/hTmn less than the corresponding percentile) was assessed first in a multivariable marginal Cox proportional model with the interaction term between CFC status and PCI (performed or not), and then the optimal definition of CFC was explored.

Results: We observed a significant interaction between predefined low CFC and PCI (p=0.067). With the optimal definition of CFC (CFR ≤3.2 and 1/hTmn ≤2.8), the HR (95% CI) of PCI was 0.278  (0.103-0.751) and 1.393  (0.783-2.478) in lesions with low and normal CFC, respectively. If lesions with fractional flow reserve (FFR) ≤0.8 and normal CFC had been deferred, the number of PCI would have decreased by 64%.

Conclusions: FFR-guided PCI for low CFC lesions was associated with reduced incidence of MACE in low CFC but not in normal CFC lesions. Our results suggest the potential use of CFC in combination with FFR for optimising the indication for PCI by reducing potentially unbeneficial PCI. Clinical Trials Registration:

Sign in to read and download the full article

Forgot your password?

No account yet?
Sign up for free!

Create my pcr account

Join us for free and access thousands of articles from EuroIntervention, as well as presentations, videos, cases from

clinical researchfractional flow reservestable angina
Coronary interventionsStable CAD
Read next article
Normal values of thermodilution-derived absolute coronary blood flow and microvascular resistance in humans

Latest news