DOI: 10.4244/EIJV7I9A179

Catheter-induced coronary dissection during optical coherence tomography investigation

David K. Smith, BSc MBBS MRCP; Hamed Bourenane; Julian W. Strange, MB ChB MRCP MD; Andreas Baumbach, MD FRCP FESC; Thomas W. Johnson*, BSc MBBS MRCP MD

A 58-year-old lady presented with atypical chest pain, anterior ECG changes and troponin elevation. Coronary angiography, via the radial artery, delineated unobstructed right and circumflex coronaries but ectasia and delayed contrast clearance within the mid-LAD, suggestive of spontaneous coronary dissection (Figure1). An OCT study was undertaken to confirm the diagnosis. Vessel tortuosity prevented passage of the OCT catheter to the mid vessel despite aggressive guide intubation. OCT evaluation of the proximal LAD, using a pump-assisted contrast flush (20ml contrast injection at 3ml/sec [300 psi]) , revealed no significant arterial pathology. However, on catheter withdrawal an extensive proximal-vessel dissection was evident. The patient remained haemodynamically stable and the dissection was sealed with two stents extending from left main to proximal LAD, with OCT-guided optimisation.

Figure 1. PanelA: Diagnostic angiogram demonstrating mid-LAD ectasia (white block arrow) with late clearance of contrast (inset arrow) suggestive of spontaneous coronary dissection. PanelB: Angiogram, acquired immediately post-OCT acquisition, delineating an iatrogenic dissection (white block arrow) within the proximal LAD with contrast filling of the false lumen (inset arrow). PanelC: Cranial view demonstrating extension of the dissection back into the left main stem (white block arrow). PanelD: Cross-sectional OCT image of reference vessel (prox. LAD mean diameter 3.45mm) PanelE: OCT longitudinal section demonstrating the extent of the dissection – from catheter tip to proximal LAD (double headed white arrow), with a blood-filled false lumen on the superior surface (white arrow heads). PanelF: OCT cross-section demonstrating intimal disruption (white arrow head) and dehiscence of the intima and upper media from the vessel wall (white block arrow) PanelG: OCT cross-section with automated measurements of true lumen area (2.63 mm2) and the true vessel area (10.76mm2 – consistent with PanelD reference area). PanelH: Cross-sectional OCT image of the left main stem demonstrating extension of the intimal dissection (block arrow heads). PanelI: OCT acquisition, following stenting of the LAD with 3.5×23mm Multilink stent (Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, CA, USA), with evidence of intimal disruption with blood spanning the true and false lumens (white block arrow head) and stent strut malapposition (yellow block arrow heads). PanelJ: Final angiographic result following deployment of an overlapping stent within the LMS (4.0×15 Multilink stent) and post-dilatation to high pressure with 3.5 and 4.0 non-compliant balloons in the LAD and LMS, respectively. PanelK: Final OCT acquisition confirming appropriate stent sizing, strut apposition and minimisation of vessel trauma.

The exquisite images, generated with OCT, facilitate safe and accurate delineation of arterial pathology and optimisation of stenting procedures.1 However, it is important to recognise that imaging techniques are associated with potential risks. The PROSPECT trial reported a 1.6% rate of procedural complicationd.2

OCT image quality remains dependent on the clearance of blood from the vessel lumen. Appropriate guide catheter selection, co-axial coronary intubation and an effective flush technique are critically important for safe and effective OCT image acquisition.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Volume 7 Number 9
Jan 20, 2012
Volume 7 Number 9
View full issue


Key metrics

On the same subject

Editorial

10.4244/EIJ-E-24-00010 Apr 15, 2024
Timing of revascularisation in acute coronary syndromes with multivessel disease – two sides of the same coin
Stähli B and Stehli J
free

Editorial

10.4244/EIJ-E-24-00006 Apr 15, 2024
The miracle of left ventricular recovery after transcatheter aortic valve implantation
Dauerman H and Lahoud R
free

Research Correspondence

10.4244/EIJ-D-23-01046 Apr 15, 2024
Feasibility and safety of transcaval venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in severe cardiogenic shock
Giustino G et al

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00836 Apr 15, 2024
Renal denervation in the management of hypertension
Lauder L et al
free

Original Research

10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00643 Apr 15, 2024
A study of ChatGPT in facilitating Heart Team decisions on severe aortic stenosis
Salihu A et al
Trending articles
337.88

State-of-the-Art Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00904 Apr 1, 2022
Antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention
Angiolillo D et al
free
283.98

State-of-the-Art Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00695 Nov 19, 2021
Transcatheter treatment for tricuspid valve disease
Praz F et al
free
226.03

State-of-the-Art Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00426 Dec 3, 2021
Myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary artery disease
Lindahl B et al
free
209.5

State-of-the-Art Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-01034 Jun 3, 2022
Management of in-stent restenosis
Alfonso F et al
free
168.4

Expert review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00690 May 15, 2022
Crush techniques for percutaneous coronary intervention of bifurcation lesions
Moroni F et al
free
150.28

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-22-00776 Apr 3, 2023
Computed tomographic angiography in coronary artery disease
Serruys PW et al
free
103.48

Expert consensus

10.4244/EIJ-E-22-00018 Dec 4, 2023
Definitions and Standardized Endpoints for Treatment of Coronary Bifurcations
Lunardi M et al
free
X

The Official Journal of EuroPCR and the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI)

EuroPCR EAPCI
PCR ESC
Impact factor: 6.2
2022 Journal Citation Reports®
Science Edition (Clarivate Analytics, 2023)
Online ISSN 1969-6213 - Print ISSN 1774-024X
© 2005-2024 Europa Group - All rights reserved