In the last two decades, the comparison between percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in the treatment of patients with multivessel and left main disease has been the object of at least a dozen large randomised controlled trials (RCTs).
One of the problems in the PCI vs. CABG debate is that, due to the continuous improvement in the technical and technological aspects of the two procedures, most of the comparative analyses are outdated soon after (or sometimes even at the moment of) their publication.
We herein describe three recent findings that will most ...
Sign in to read and download the full articleForgot your password?
Join us for free and access thousands of articles from EuroIntervention, as well as presentations, videos, cases from PCRonline.com