Original Research

DOI: 10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00563

Ultrathin-strut versus thin-strut stent healing and outcomes in preclinical and clinical subjects

Ryutaro Ikegami1,2, MD, PhD; Zhonglie Piao3, PhD; Juan F. Iglesias4, MD, PhD; Thomas Pilgrim5, MD; Khanh Ha6,7, PhD; Jason R. McCarthy6,7, PhD; Maria I. Castellanos8,9, PhD; Mohamad B. Kassab1, MD; Mazen S. Albagdadi1,10, MD, MSc; Adam Mauskapf1, BS; Graham Spicer3, PhD; David E. Kandzari11, MD; Elazer R. Edelman12,13,14, MD, PhD; Peter Libby14, MD; Dik Heg15, PhD; Michael Joner8,9, MD; Guillermo J. Tearney3,12, MD, PhD; Farouc A. Jaffer1,3, MD, PhD

Abstract

Background: Compared with thin-strut durable-polymer drug-eluting stents (DP-DES), ultrathin-strut biodegradable-polymer sirolimus-eluting stents (BP-SES) improve stent-related clinical outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Reduced stent strut thickness is hypothesised to underlie these benefits, but this conjecture remains unproven.

Aims: We aimed to assess the impact of strut thickness on stent healing and clinical outcomes between ultrathin-strut and thin-strut BP-SES.

Methods: First, we performed a preclinical study of 8 rabbits implanted with non-overlapping thin-strut (diameter/thickness 3.5 mm/80 μm) and ultrathin-strut (diameter/thickness 3.0 mm/60 μm) BP-SES in the infrarenal aorta. On day 7, the rabbits underwent intravascular near-infrared fluorescence optical coherence tomography (NIRF-OCT) molecular-structural imaging of fibrin deposition and stent tissue coverage, followed by histopathological analysis. Second, we conducted an individual data pooled analysis of patients enrolled in the BIOSCIENCE and BIOSTEMI randomised PCI trials treated with ultrathin-strut (n=282) or thin-strut (n=222) BP-SES. The primary endpoint was target lesion failure (TLF) at 1-year follow-up, with a landmark analysis at 30 days.

Results: NIRF-OCT image analyses revealed that ultrathin-strut and thin-strut BP-SES exhibited similar stent fibrin deposition (p=0.49) and percentage...

Sign in to read
the full article

Forgot your password?
No account yet?
Sign up for free!

Create my pcr account

Join us for free and access thousands of articles from EuroIntervention, as well as presentations, videos, cases from PCRonline.com

Volume 20 Number 10
May 20, 2024
Volume 20 Number 10
View full issue


Key metrics

On the same subject

10.4244/EIJV14I12A224 Dec 20, 2018
Covering our tracks – optical coherence tomography to assess vascular healing
Ali ZA et al
free
Trending articles
212.15

State-of-the-Art Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-01034 Jun 3, 2022
Management of in-stent restenosis
Alfonso F et al
free
173.13

Focus article

10.4244/EIJY19M08_01 Jan 17, 2020
EHRA/EAPCI expert consensus statement on catheter-based left atrial appendage occlusion – an update
Glikson M et al
free
168

Translational research

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00824 May 15, 2022
Bench test and in vivo evaluation of longitudinal stent deformation during proximal optimisation
Toth GG et al
free
76.9

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00840 Sep 2, 2024
Aortic regurgitation: from mechanisms to management
Baumbach A et al
free
X

The Official Journal of EuroPCR and the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI)

EuroPCR EAPCI
PCR ESC
Impact factor: 7.6
2023 Journal Citation Reports®
Science Edition (Clarivate Analytics, 2024)
Online ISSN 1969-6213 - Print ISSN 1774-024X
© 2005-2024 Europa Group - All rights reserved