Image – Interventional flashlight

DOI: 10.4244/EIJ-D-18-00870

Single lobe left atrial appendage with large ostia anatomy: implications for kissing-Watchman technology

Linying Xia, MD, PhD; Yi Liu, MD, PhD; Haitao Liu, MD, PhD; Ling Tao*, MD, PhD

Figure 1. Angiography and TOE imaging of the kissing-Watchman procedure and follow-up. A) Three-dimensional TOE revealed the large LAA ostium. B) The 27 mm WATCHMAN device was pre-released and held still at the intended landing zone. C) A second WATCHMAN device was placed adjacent to the 27 mm device. D) The two WATCHMAN devices in a kissing fashion. E) TOE at three-month follow-up showed adequate LAA sealing, and no device-related thrombus was identified. F) TOE at one-year follow-up showed adequate LAA sealing, without device-related thrombus.

The WATCHMAN™ device (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA, USA) is the predominant occluder used in China because of medical insurance policies. Though there are larger sizes in other devices nowadays, the maximum commercially available WATCHMAN device is 33 mm, which only fits a left atrial appendage (LAA) with a maximum diameter of 30 mm. In patients with multilobed LAA and a large LAA ostium, the implantation of two devices, either in a one-stop or in a staged procedure to seal the LAA completely, is feasible as reported by previous studies1-4. However, it is unknown whether this approach is feasible in the setting of a single lobe with a giant ostium (>30 mm). We describe here the simultaneous kissing-Watchman technique to occlude a single lobe LAA with large ostium anatomy.

The patient was a 70-year-old male with atrial fibrillation (CHA2DS2-VASc=3) on warfarin who was referred for LAA closure due to gastrointestinal bleeding. Transoesophageal echocardiography (TOE) showed a single lobe LAA with a maximum LAA ostium of 35 mm (Moving image 1). Three-dimensional TOE confirmed the large LAA ostium (Figure 1A). Therefore, use of the kissing-Watchman technique was planned, with two WATCHMAN devices in 27 mm and 21 mm sizes. The 27 mm WATCHMAN device was pre-released and held still at the intended implantation zone (Figure 1B, Moving image 2). A second transseptal puncture was performed, and the 21 mm WATCHMAN device was placed carefully next to the 27 mm device in a kissing fashion (Figure 1C, Moving image 2). The tug test was performed on the two devices by pulling the parallel delivery systems simultaneously (Moving image 2). The two devices were released one after the other when the PASS criteria had been met (Figure 1D, Moving image 2). TOE at three-month and one-year follow-up showed adequate LAA sealing, and no device-related thrombus was identified (Figure 1E, Figure 1F, Moving image 3). Full-dose rivaroxaban was prescribed for the first three months post operation, then dual antiplatelet therapy for the next eight months. Clinical observation during the 12-month follow-up revealed no severe complications or major adverse events.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Supplementary data

To read the full content of this article, please download the PDF.

Moving image 1. TOE imaging of the single lobe LAA with large ostium.

Moving image 2. Angiography imaging of the kissing-Watchman procedure.

Moving image 3. TOE follow-up.

Volume 14 Number 15
Feb 7, 2019
Volume 14 Number 15
View full issue


Key metrics

On the same subject

Short report

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00512 May 15, 2022
Double LAmbre technique for percutaneous occlusion of very large left atrial appendages: a case series
Cruz-González I et al
free

Image – Interventional flashlight

10.4244/EIJ-D-19-00394 Dec 18, 2020
Double device closure for large or bilobar left atrial appendage anatomy
Alkhouli M et al
free

Short report

10.4244/EIJ-D-19-00821 May 16, 2021
Procedural and short-term outcomes of occluding large left atrial appendages with the LAmbre device
So C et al
free

IMAGE IN CARDIOLOGY

10.4244/EIJV12I2A44 Jun 10, 2016
The plug for the appendage
Buellesfeld L et al
free

Image – Interventional flashlight

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00624 Jun 3, 2022
Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure in a surgically ligated left atrial appendage
Wong I et al
free

10.4244/EIJV16I11A163 Dec 4, 2020
WATCHMAN versus AMPLATZER Cardiac Plug: which will prevail?
Saw J and Inohara T
free

10.4244/EIJV12SXA10 May 16, 2016
Left atrial appendage closure: patient, device and post-procedure drug selection
Tzikas A and Bergmann M
free

Image – Interventional flashlight

10.4244/EIJ-D-18-01064 Apr 16, 2019
Management of incomplete surgical left atrial appendage exclusion
Alkhouli M and Raybuck B
free
Trending articles
338.63

State-of-the-Art Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00904 Apr 1, 2022
Antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention
Angiolillo D et al
free
295.45

Expert consensus

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00898 Sep 20, 2022
Intravascular ultrasound guidance for lower extremity arterial and venous interventions
Secemsky E et al
free
226.03

State-of-the-Art Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00426 Dec 3, 2021
Myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary artery disease
Lindahl B et al
free
209.5

State-of-the-Art Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-01034 Jun 3, 2022
Management of in-stent restenosis
Alfonso F et al
free
168.4

Expert review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00690 May 15, 2022
Crush techniques for percutaneous coronary intervention of bifurcation lesions
Moroni F et al
free
150.28

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-22-00776 Apr 3, 2023
Computed tomographic angiography in coronary artery disease
Serruys PW et al
free
103.48

Expert consensus

10.4244/EIJ-E-22-00018 Dec 4, 2023
Definitions and Standardized Endpoints for Treatment of Coronary Bifurcations
Lunardi M et al
free
X

The Official Journal of EuroPCR and the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI)

EuroPCR EAPCI
PCR ESC
Impact factor: 6.2
2022 Journal Citation Reports®
Science Edition (Clarivate Analytics, 2023)
Online ISSN 1969-6213 - Print ISSN 1774-024X
© 2005-2024 Europa Group - All rights reserved