DOI: 10.4244/EIJ-D-19-00364R

Reply to the Letter to the Editor “Very long-term outcome of coronary covered stents. Not all covered stents are the same”

Jan Harnek1, MD, PhD; Stefan K. James2, MD, PhD; Bo Lagerqvist2, MD, PhD

The authors are grateful for the interest in our article “Very long-term outcome of coronary covered stents: a report from the SCAAR registry”1 shown by Jurado-Roman et al2.

We agree with the comments that all covered stents (CS) are not the same. For that reason every covered stent has been reported separately. Despite the limitations because of the observational design of our study, the Figures and Tables suggest that there are differences between the different CS. It is equally notable that all CS have higher rates of adverse events except for the equine pericardial CS that had no cases of stent thrombosis throughout the study period. A reason to extrapolate the overall CS results is to give an idea of how well a particular CS is performing compared to an average.

Obviously, the indication to use a CS is different from that for other stents. The concern that we tried to address is whether their high rate of adverse events continues over time or not, comparing the results with the known, commonly used modern stents.

Remember that most hospitals worldwide will only have one CS on their shelves and that type of CS may well be an older generation of CS.

As explained in the editorial3 accompanying our paper, newer CS have improved deliverability and can be used in more complex and distal lesions which may have a negative impact on outcome. New devices and technologies should be introduced with some degree of caution. This was clearly demonstrated in the now (2012) withdrawn “Over and Under” (Amnis Therapeutics, Or Akiva, Israel), which was used in exactly similar conditions to the other CS but resulted in significantly poorer outcomes except for stent thrombosis. It emphasises the obligation for all large registries to publish real-world results of different devices rapidly as there may not be a class effect.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Supplementary data

To read the full content of this article, please download the PDF.

Volume 15 Number 14
Feb 20, 2020
Volume 15 Number 14
View full issue


Key metrics

Suggested by Cory

10.4244/EIJV14I16A278 Mar 20, 2019
Should we implant a covered stent only when there is no other solution?
Colombo A and Mangieri A
free

CLINICAL RESEARCH

10.4244/EIJ-D-18-00855 Mar 20, 2019
Very long-term outcome of coronary covered stents: a report from the SCAAR registry
Harnek J et al
free

10.4244/EIJ-D-19-00364L Feb 20, 2020
Very long-term outcome of coronary covered stents. Not all covered stents are the same
Jurado-Román A et al
free

Sep 30, 2009
The SCAAR-scare in perspective
James S et al
free

EXPERT REVIEW

10.4244/EIJV12I10A210 Nov 20, 2016
Coronary covered stents
Kilic D et al
free

10.4244/EIJV8I4A70 Aug 24, 2012
Comparison of two drug-eluting balloons: a report from the SCAAR registry
Bondesson P et al
free

10.4244/EIJV16I18A266 Apr 2, 2021
Similar long-term outcome of dissimilar drug-eluting stents: is it time to change the assessment?
von Birgelen C and Ploumen EH
free
Trending articles
57.8

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00386 Feb 3, 2025
Mechanical circulatory support for complex, high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention
Ferro E et al
free
39.45

Clinical research

10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00725 Nov 19, 2023
A systematic algorithm for large-bore arterial access closure after TAVI: the TAVI-MultiCLOSE study
Rosseel L et al
free
39.45

Original Research

10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00725 Mar 18, 2024
A systematic algorithm for large-bore arterial access closure after TAVI: the TAVI-MultiCLOSE study
Rosseel L et al
free
36

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00448 Jan 15, 2024
Coronary spasm and vasomotor dysfunction as a cause of MINOCA
Yaker ZS et al
free
35.15

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00895 Apr 1, 2024
Percutaneous interventions for pulmonary embolism
Finocchiaro S et al
free
28.5

CLINICAL RESEARCH

10.4244/EIJV11I1A6 May 19, 2015
European expert consensus on rotational atherectomy
Barbato E et al
free
22.55

CLINICAL RESEARCH

10.4244/EIJV12I5A93 Aug 5, 2016
Longer pre-hospital delays and higher mortality in women with STEMI: the e-MUST Registry
Benamer H et al
free
X

The Official Journal of EuroPCR and the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI)

EuroPCR EAPCI
PCR ESC
Impact factor: 7.6
2023 Journal Citation Reports®
Science Edition (Clarivate Analytics, 2024)
Online ISSN 1969-6213 - Print ISSN 1774-024X
© 2005-2025 Europa Group - All rights reserved