This case report demonstrates the potential for contrast agent-free preprocedural planning (Figure 1A-C) and transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI; Figure 1D-H) of a Direct Flow Medical® (DFM) transcatheter aortic valve (Direct Flow Medical, Santa Rosa, CA, USA), a device without a metallic frame, in an 84-year-old patient with renal failure and a severe aortic valve stenosis. Avoiding any application of contrast agent, and therefore its related complications, might extend even further the indication for TAVI implantation in such high-risk patients. This approach might currently be limited to certain anatomies and special clinical situations until larger studies confirm the strategy.

Figure 1. Pre- and intraprocedural imaging. Using non-contrast 3D FLASH MRA and no-contrast CT (A), the distance to the right/left coronary ostium was measured perpendicular to the annular plane. B) The cross-sectional area was assessed by means of planimetry, and (C) an optimal fluoroscopic angulation for the DFM implantation was assessed with all three leaflets in line. Pigtail catheters were placed in the NCC (#) and RCC (*) to draw an imaginary line for identification of the landing zone for the ventricular DFM ring (D). Positioning (E) and final fluoroscopic result (F) of the DFM implantation with an optimal position. TEE confirms optimal position of the DFM valve with only trace paravalvular AR (G & H).

Conflict of interest statement

J. Reinöhl is a proctor for Direct Flow Medical. F. De Marco and A. Latib are consultants for Direct Flow Medical. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.



Key metrics

Suggested by Cory

10.4244/EIJV8I5A82 Sep 28, 2012
Computed tomography to improve TAVI outcomes
Debonnaire P et al
free

AORTIC VALVE INTERVENTIONS

10.4244/EIJV12SYA6 Sep 18, 2016
TAVI with current CE-marked devices: strategies for optimal sizing and valve delivery
van Gils L et al
free

Image – Interventional flashlight

10.4244/EIJ-D-20-00426 Sep 18, 2020
Technical considerations for repeat transcatheter aortic valve implantation in a failing Direct Flow Medical transcatheter heart valve
Yap J et al
free

Image – Interventional flashlight

10.4244/EIJ-D-19-00690 Aug 28, 2020
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation after transcatheter mitral valve implantation
Kuhn E et al
free

Image – Interventional flashlight

10.4244/EIJ-D-22-00385 Jan 23, 2023
Double chimney stenting without contrast during transcatheter aortic valve-in-valve implantation
Armario X et al
free

Short report

10.4244/EIJ-D-19-01094 Jun 12, 2020
TAVR-in-TAVR and coronary access: importance of preprocedural planning
Tarantini G et al
free

10.4244/EIJV7I1A25 May 17, 2011
How should I treat acute valve regurgitation?
Schultz C et al
free
Trending articles
151.43

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-22-00776 Apr 3, 2023
Computed tomographic angiography in coronary artery disease
Serruys PW et al
free
55.9

Clinical research

10.4244/EIJ-D-22-00621 Feb 20, 2023
Long-term changes in coronary physiology after aortic valve replacement
Sabbah M et al
free
54.9

Expert review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-01010 Jun 24, 2022
Device-related thrombus following left atrial appendage occlusion
Simard T et al
free
43.75

Clinical Research

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-01091 Aug 5, 2022
Lifetime management of patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis: a computed tomography simulation study
Medranda G et al
free
39.95

Clinical research

10.4244/EIJ-D-22-00558 Feb 6, 2023
Permanent pacemaker implantation and left bundle branch block with self-expanding valves – a SCOPE 2 subanalysis
Pellegrini C et al
free
X

The Official Journal of EuroPCR and the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI)

EuroPCR EAPCI
PCR ESC
Impact factor: 7.6
2023 Journal Citation Reports®
Science Edition (Clarivate Analytics, 2024)
Online ISSN 1969-6213 - Print ISSN 1774-024X
© 2005-2024 Europa Group - All rights reserved