Original Research

DOI: 10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00314

Optical frequency domain imaging-guided versus intravascular ultrasound-guided percutaneous coronary intervention for acute coronary syndromes: the OPINION ACS randomised trial

Hiromasa Otake1, MD, PhD; Takashi Kubo2, MD, PhD; Kiyoshi Hibi3, MD, PhD; Makoto Natsumeda4, MD; Masaru Ishida5, MD, PhD; Toru Kataoka6, MD, PhD; Tomofumi Takaya7, MD, PhD; Masamichi Iwasaki8, MD; Shinjo Sonoda9, MD, PhD; Toshiro Shinke10, MD, PhD; Gaku Nakazawa11, MD, PhD; Yu Takahashi1, MD, PhD; Tetsuya Ioji12, MS; Takashi Akasaka13, MD, PhD; OPINION ACS investigators

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The clinical benefits of optical frequency domain imaging (OFDI)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) remain unclear.

AIMS: We sought to compare intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)- and OFDI-guided PCI in patients with ACS.

METHODS: OPINION ACS is a multicentre, prospective, randomised, non-inferiority trial that compared OFDI-guided PCI with IVUS-guided PCI using current-generation drug-eluting stents in ACS patients (n=158). The primary endpoint was in-stent minimum lumen area (MLA), assessed using 8-month follow-up OFDI.

RESULTS: Patients presented with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (55%), non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (29%), or unstable angina pectoris (16%). PCI procedural success was achieved in all patients, with comparably low periprocedural complications rates in both groups. Immediately after PCI, the minimum stent area (p=0.096) tended to be smaller for OFDI versus IVUS guidance. Proximal stent edge dissection (p=0.012) and irregular protrusion (p=0.03) were significantly less frequent in OFDI-guided procedures than in IVUS-guided procedures. Post-PCI coronary flow, assessed using corrected Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction frame counts, was significantly better in the OFDI-guided group than in the IVUS-guided group (p<0.001). The least squares mean (95%...

Sign in to read
the full article

Forgot your password?
No account yet?
Sign up for free!

Create my pcr account

Join us for free and access thousands of articles from EuroIntervention, as well as presentations, videos, cases from PCRonline.com

Volume 20 Number 17
Sep 2, 2024
Volume 20 Number 17
View full issue


Key metrics

On the same subject

Editorial

10.4244/EIJ-E-24-00049 Sep 2, 2024
Stent sizing in imaging-guided percutaneous coronary intervention: potential benefits of a more cautious approach
Adriaenssens T and Sinnaeve P
free

Debate

10.4244/EIJ-E-24-00028 Sep 16, 2024
IVUS has more robust data than OCT for PCI guidance: PROS and CONS
Maehara A et al
free

Debate

10.4244/EIJ-E-24-00008 May 10, 2024
We now have enough evidence to support systematic OCT in daily PCI practice: pros and cons
Ali ZA et al
free

10.4244/EIJV12I13A257 Jan 20, 2017
Small details make a big difference
Kang D and Park S
free
Trending articles
203.9

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00089 Jun 11, 2021
Intracoronary optical coherence tomography: state of the art and future directions
Ali ZA et al
free
160.58

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-22-00725 Jan 23, 2023
Mitral valve transcatheter edge-to-edge repair
Hausleiter J et al
free
75.15

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00840 Sep 2, 2024
Aortic regurgitation: from mechanisms to management
Baumbach A et al
free
69.7

Clinical research

10.4244/EIJ-D-20-00763 Dec 18, 2020
Twelve-month clinical and imaging outcomes of the uncaging coronary DynamX bioadaptor system
Verheye S et al
free
X

The Official Journal of EuroPCR and the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI)

EuroPCR EAPCI
PCR ESC
Impact factor: 7.6
2023 Journal Citation Reports®
Science Edition (Clarivate Analytics, 2024)
Online ISSN 1969-6213 - Print ISSN 1774-024X
© 2005-2024 Europa Group - All rights reserved