Debate

DOI: 10.4244/EIJ-E-24-00008

We now have enough evidence to support systematic OCT in daily PCI practice: pros and cons

Ziad A. Ali1,2,3, MD, DPhil; Doosup Shin1, MD; Abhishek Chaturvedi4, MD; Ron Waksman4, MD

Introduction

Intravascular coronary imaging has the potential to address the limitations of angiography in guiding percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) procedures. In particular, optical coherence tomography (OCT) can offer valuable insights into vessel and plaque characteristics. When used after PCI, OCT can also give important information on stent implantation, highlighting eventual needs for PCI optimisation and, therefore, contributing to improved PCI outcomes. However, OCT remains underused because of concerns regarding procedural time, costs and safety. In addition, current evidence on the routine use of OCT is controversial and, when intravascular imaging (IVI) is indicated, intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) might be preferred based on anatomical or procedural considerations. Whether accruing evidence will foster OCT as a standard tool for guiding and optimising PCI is an area of uncertainty.

Pros

Ziad A. Ali, MD, DPhil; Doosup Shin, MD

Although PCI is mostly guided by angiography, its use has well-established limitations in assessing lesion severity, plaque morphology and atherosclerosis burden, which are crucial in pre-PCI planning1. It is also limited in detecting stent underexpansion, malappositon, edge dissection, and...

Sign in to read
the full article

Forgot your password?
No account yet?
Sign up for free!

Create my pcr account

Join us for free and access thousands of articles from EuroIntervention, as well as presentations, videos, cases from PCRonline.com

Volume 20 Number 9
May 10, 2024
Volume 20 Number 9
View full issue


Key metrics

Suggested by Cory

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00912 Oct 7, 2024
Optical coherence tomography to guide percutaneous coronary intervention
Almajid F et al
free

Debate

10.4244/EIJ-E-24-00028 Sep 16, 2024
IVUS has more robust data than OCT for PCI guidance: PROS and CONS
Maehara A et al
free

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00089 Jun 11, 2021
Intracoronary optical coherence tomography: state of the art and future directions
Ali ZA et al
free

10.4244/EIJV7I11A211 Mar 21, 2012
Tools & Techniques: Intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography
Chan P et al
free
Trending articles
225.68

State-of-the-Art Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00426 Dec 3, 2021
Myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary artery disease
Lindahl B et al
free
105.78

Expert consensus

10.4244/EIJ-E-22-00018 Dec 4, 2023
Definitions and Standardized Endpoints for Treatment of Coronary Bifurcations
Lunardi M et al
free
77.85

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00840 Sep 2, 2024
Aortic regurgitation: from mechanisms to management
Baumbach A et al
free
68.7

Clinical research

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00545 Sep 20, 2022
Coronary lithotripsy for the treatment of underexpanded stents: the international; multicentre CRUNCH registry
Tovar Forero M et al
free
47.8

NEW INNOVATION

10.4244/EIJ-D-15-00467 Feb 20, 2018
Design and principle of operation of the HeartMate PHP (percutaneous heart pump)
Van Mieghem NM et al
free
45.3

Clinical research

10.4244/EIJ-D-18-01126 Aug 29, 2019
New-generation mechanical circulatory support during high-risk PCI: a cross-sectional analysis
Ameloot K et al
free
X

The Official Journal of EuroPCR and the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI)

EuroPCR EAPCI
PCR ESC
Impact factor: 7.6
2023 Journal Citation Reports®
Science Edition (Clarivate Analytics, 2024)
Online ISSN 1969-6213 - Print ISSN 1774-024X
© 2005-2024 Europa Group - All rights reserved