Editorial

DOI: 10.4244/EIJ-E-24-00049

Stent sizing in imaging-guided percutaneous coronary intervention: potential benefits of a more cautious approach

Tom Adriaenssens1, MD, PhD; Peter Sinnaeve1, MD, PhD

With the publication of several large randomised clinical trials (RCT), intracoronary imaging-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) was a well-covered topic in 20231234. In general, these studies confirmed the benefit of the application of both sound- (intravascular ultrasound [IVUS]) and light- (optical coherence tomography [OCT] or optical frequency domain imaging [OFDI]) based intracoronary imaging systems. The most important benefits are seen in the most challenging PCI cases, such as in patients with coronary bifurcation lesions2.

In this issue of EuroIntervention, Otake et al report the results of the OPINION ACS randomised controlled trial, a comparison of OFDI- vs IVUS-guided PCI in the specific subset of patients presenting with an acute coronary syndrome (ACS)5. With a total of 158 patients enrolled, the current study is much smaller than other recently reported trials in this field (e.g., ILUMIEN IV: 2,487 patients; OCTIVUS: 2,008 patients; RENOVATE COMPLEX PCI: 1,639 patients; OPINION: 829 patients; OCTOBER: 1,201 patients)12346. It is also not the first report on intracoronary imaging in ACS patients, as more than half of...

Sign in to read
the full article

Forgot your password?
No account yet?
Sign up for free!

Create my pcr account

Join us for free and access thousands of articles from EuroIntervention, as well as presentations, videos, cases from PCRonline.com

Volume 20 Number 17
Sep 2, 2024
Volume 20 Number 17
View full issue


Key metrics

Suggested by Cory

10.4244/EIJV17I3A33 Jun 25, 2021
Clinical benefit of pre-stenting intravascular ultrasound
Kubo T and Shiono Y
free

10.4244/EIJV12I13A257 Jan 20, 2017
Small details make a big difference
Kang D and Park S
free

Debate

10.4244/EIJ-E-24-00028 Sep 16, 2024
IVUS has more robust data than OCT for PCI guidance: PROS and CONS
Maehara A et al
free

Debate

10.4244/EIJ-E-24-00008 May 10, 2024
We now have enough evidence to support systematic OCT in daily PCI practice: pros and cons
Ali ZA et al
free
Trending articles
225.68

State-of-the-Art Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00426 Dec 3, 2021
Myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary artery disease
Lindahl B et al
free
105.78

Expert consensus

10.4244/EIJ-E-22-00018 Dec 4, 2023
Definitions and Standardized Endpoints for Treatment of Coronary Bifurcations
Lunardi M et al
free
77.85

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00840 Sep 2, 2024
Aortic regurgitation: from mechanisms to management
Baumbach A et al
free
68.7

Clinical research

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00545 Sep 20, 2022
Coronary lithotripsy for the treatment of underexpanded stents: the international; multicentre CRUNCH registry
Tovar Forero M et al
free
47.8

NEW INNOVATION

10.4244/EIJ-D-15-00467 Feb 20, 2018
Design and principle of operation of the HeartMate PHP (percutaneous heart pump)
Van Mieghem NM et al
free
45.3

Clinical research

10.4244/EIJ-D-18-01126 Aug 29, 2019
New-generation mechanical circulatory support during high-risk PCI: a cross-sectional analysis
Ameloot K et al
free
X

The Official Journal of EuroPCR and the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI)

EuroPCR EAPCI
PCR ESC
Impact factor: 7.6
2023 Journal Citation Reports®
Science Edition (Clarivate Analytics, 2024)
Online ISSN 1969-6213 - Print ISSN 1774-024X
© 2005-2024 Europa Group - All rights reserved