INTERVENTIONAL FLASHLIGHT

DOI: 10.4244/EIJ-D-17-00650

Influence of the sequence of proximal optimisation technique and side branch dilation for the opening of jailed struts after coronary bifurcation stenting

Yoshinobu Murasato1,2*, MD, PhD; Takahiro Mori1,2, MD, PhD; Takayuki Okamura3, MD, PhD; Junya Shite4, MD, PhD

For the optimal treatment of the side branch (SB) after main vessel (MV) stenting in coronary bifurcation lesions, confirming the guidewire recrossing (GWR) point in the SB ostium is crucial1. Three-dimensional (3D) imaging with optical coherence tomography (OCT) can visualise the GWR point clearly. We encountered unusual deflection of the protruded struts treated with the proximal optimisation technique (POT) and SB dilation, when the GWR into proximal cells of the struts overhung into the SB ostium.

Deflection to the SB

A 67-year-old man with a 1,1,0 lesion in the left circumflex artery obtuse marginal branch bifurcation (Panel Aa), in which vessel references in the proximal, distal MV and SB were 3.2, 2.6, and 2.8 mm, respectively, underwent zotarolimus-eluting 2.75×12 mm stent (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA) implantation at 8 atm (Panel Ab). POT was performed with the stent delivery balloon at 12 atm with its distal marker located in the carina to ensure that the stent was well apposed (Panel Ac). A 2.5×4 mm Glider PTCA balloon (TriReme, Pleasanton, CA, USA) was subsequently dilated in the SB ostium (Panel Ad). The procedure was guided with two-dimensional (2D) OCT (St. Jude Medical, St. Paul, MN, USA) and the data were sent to another hospital for 3D reconstruction using dedicated software (INTAGE Realia; CYBERNET, Tokyo, Japan). The 3D image demonstrated GWR into the proximal cell (Panel Ba); however, the protruded struts were folded towards the distal SB after SB dilation (Panel Bb-Bd, Moving image 1, Moving image 2).

Deflection to the distal MV

An 80-year-old man with a 1,1,0 lesion in the distal right coronary artery (Panel Da), in which vessel references in the proximal, distal main vessels and side branch were 2.8, 2.3, and 2.5 mm, respectively, underwent zotarolimus-eluting 2.25×26 mm stent implantation (Panel Db). GWR and subsequent SB dilation with a 2.5×4 mm Glider balloon were performed (Panel Dc), followed by POT dilation with a 3.25×10 mm balloon (Panel Dd). The 3D OCT image also demonstrated GWR into the proximal cell (Panel Ea); however, the protruded struts turned towards the distal MV after SB dilation (Panel Eb, Panel Ec). The deflected struts were apposed to the vessel with final kissing balloon inflation (Moving image 3).

These two bifurcation interventions were performed similarly, except for the sequence of POT and SB dilation; however, deflection of the protruded struts at the carinal area was in opposite directions. In case 1, POT before SB dilation enabled adequate strut expansion with some deflection towards the distal SB, and subsequent SB dilation completed this deflection (Panel C). In contrast, in case 2, POT after SB dilation resulted in deflection of the protruded struts towards the distal MV (Panel F). The remaining more obstructive struts after SB dilation following the zotarolimus-eluting stent deployment2 might enhance the risk of deflection of the protruded struts. POT should be performed before SB dilation, and 3D OCT is helpful to identify the GWR point and avoid serious stent deformation.

Conflict of interest statement

J. Shite is a compensated consultant for St. Jude Medical. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Supplementary data

Moving image 1. Flythrough view from proximal to distal MV in case 1.

Moving image 2. Flythrough view from proximal MV to SB in case 1.

Moving image 3. Flythrough view from proximal to distal MV in case 2.

To read the full content of this article, please download the PDF.

Supplementary data

To read the full content of this article, please download the PDF.

Moving image 1. Flythrough view from proximal to distal MV in case 1.

Moving image 2. Flythrough view from proximal MV to SB in case 1.

Moving image 3. Flythrough view from proximal to distal MV in case 2.

Volume 13 Number 15
Feb 2, 2018
Volume 13 Number 15
View full issue


Key metrics

Suggested by Cory

CLINICAL RESEARCH

10.4244/EIJ-D-17-00941 Jun 14, 2018
Benefit of a new provisional stenting strategy, the re-proximal optimisation technique: the rePOT clinical study
Derimay F et al
free

Translational research

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00824 May 15, 2022
Bench test and in vivo evaluation of longitudinal stent deformation during proximal optimisation
Toth GG et al
free

10.4244/EIJV11SVA14 May 19, 2015
OCT for bifurcation stenting: what have we learned?
Holm N et al
free

10.4244/EIJ-D-16-00689 Nov 20, 2017
How should I treat this mini-crush stenting complication?
Homorodean C et al
free
Trending articles
312.73

State-of-the-Art Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00695 Nov 19, 2021
Transcatheter treatment for tricuspid valve disease
Praz F et al
free
241.95

State of the art

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-01117 Sep 20, 2022
Recanalisation of coronary chronic total occlusions
Di Mario C et al
free
153.78

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-22-00776 Apr 3, 2023
Computed tomographic angiography in coronary artery disease
Serruys PW et al
free
110.9

Clinical research

10.4244/EIJ-D-20-00130 Oct 9, 2020
Double-kissing culotte technique for coronary bifurcation stenting
Toth GG et al
free
105.53

Expert consensus

10.4244/EIJ-E-22-00018 Dec 4, 2023
Definitions and Standardized Endpoints for Treatment of Coronary Bifurcations
Lunardi M et al
free
78.25

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00840 Sep 2, 2024
Aortic regurgitation: from mechanisms to management
Baumbach A et al
free
43.4

Clinical research

10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00590 Dec 4, 2023
Prognostic impact of cardiac damage staging classification in each aortic stenosis subtype undergoing TAVI
Nakase M et al
free
34.75

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00606 Jan 1, 2024
Targeting inflammation in atherosclerosis: overview, strategy and directions
Waksman R et al
free
X

The Official Journal of EuroPCR and the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI)

EuroPCR EAPCI
PCR ESC
Impact factor: 7.6
2023 Journal Citation Reports®
Science Edition (Clarivate Analytics, 2024)
Online ISSN 1969-6213 - Print ISSN 1774-024X
© 2005-2025 Europa Group - All rights reserved