INTERVENTIONAL FLASHLIGHT

DOI: 10.4244/EIJ-D-17-01109

Haemodynamic impact of a new pulsatile mechanical circulatory support in high-risk coronary stenting

Marcelo Barros Bastos, MD; Joost Daemen, MD, PhD; Nicolas M. Van Mieghem*, MD, PhD

iVAC2L™ (PulseCath BV, Amsterdam, the Netherlands) is a 17 Fr bi-directional catheter with an inlet tip, an integrated two-way valve and a connector to a membrane pump. Transfemoral access requires a 19 Fr expandable or re-collapsible Solopath® (Terumo, Shibuya, Tokyo, Japan) sheath. Driven by a helium-circuited intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) console, blood is removed from the left ventricle (LV) in systole and ejected in the aorta during diastole. Pulsatile support can reach 2 L/min, depending on heart rate and loading conditions (Panel A). Herein we illustrate LV unloading with the iVAC2L in a 70-year-old patient with an ejection fraction of 20%, severe mitral regurgitation and severe three-vessel disease. The patient initially underwent primary PCI of the left circumflex artery due to lateral ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Because of extensive residual ischaemia by single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), the Heart Team agreed on multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with mechanical circulatory support (MCS). The panels show LAD and RCA lesions before (Panel B, Panel C) and after (Panel D, Panel E) treatment. A 7 Fr conductance catheter provided LV pressure-volume (PV) loops.

Panel F shows baseline and post-activation loop sets. The means of time-matched PV points obtained from multiple loops, demonstrating post-activational left-downwards shifting are shown in Panel G. At 1:1 support, the iVAC2L flow rate was 1.28±0.04 L/min, surpassing contemporary IABP performance. The innate cardiac output (CO) decreased by 33% from its pre-support value of 4.21 L/min. Total systemic resistance fell 17%, end-systolic wall stress (WS) 15% and the pressure-volume area (PVA) 14%.

In coronary disease, oxygen depletion produces ischaemia. LV unloading reduces filling pressures, WS, myocardial oxygen consumption, chamber stiffness and microvascular resistance1. Here, reductions in maximal elastance, end-systolic pressure and +dP/dtmax suggest a decrease in contractility. An increased V30 (estimated compliance at 30 mmHg) suggests a reduction in stiffness. The PVA reduction confirms a decrease in metabolic demand. Lower end-systolic WS and Ea/Ees ratio point to optimisation of ventricular-arterial coupling.

The impact of MCS on survival is controversial. Although the iVAC2L has not been tested in large trials, our case illustrates LV unloading and hence haemodynamic improvement. The consistency of these findings will be assessed in the ongoing PULSE trial (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03200990).

Conflict of interest statement

N. Van Mieghem is an advisor for PulseCath and has received research grants from PulseCath BV. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Volume 14 Number 7
Sep 20, 2018
Volume 14 Number 7
View full issue


Key metrics

Suggested by Cory

CLINICAL RESEARCH

10.4244/EIJ-D-16-00371 Feb 20, 2017
Pulsatile iVAC 2L circulatory support in high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention
den Uil C et al
free

TECHNICAL REPORT

10.4244/EIJV11I7A168 Nov 20, 2015
The PulseCath iVAC 2L left ventricular assist device: conversion to a percutaneous transfemoral approach
Van Mieghem NM et al
free

NEW INNOVATION

10.4244/EIJ-D-15-00467 Feb 20, 2018
Design and principle of operation of the HeartMate PHP (percutaneous heart pump)
Van Mieghem NM et al
free

EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH

10.4244/EIJ-D-18-00684 Feb 7, 2019
Impella CP or VA-ECMO in profound cardiogenic shock: left ventricular unloading and organ perfusion in a large animal model
Moller-Helgestad OK et al
free

Expert review

10.4244/EIJY21M05_01 Jul 20, 2021
Joint EAPCI/ACVC expert consensus document on percutaneous ventricular assist devices
Chieffo A et al
free
Trending articles
225.68

State-of-the-Art Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00426 Dec 3, 2021
Myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary artery disease
Lindahl B et al
free
105.78

Expert consensus

10.4244/EIJ-E-22-00018 Dec 4, 2023
Definitions and Standardized Endpoints for Treatment of Coronary Bifurcations
Lunardi M et al
free
77.85

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00840 Sep 2, 2024
Aortic regurgitation: from mechanisms to management
Baumbach A et al
free
68.7

Clinical research

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00545 Sep 20, 2022
Coronary lithotripsy for the treatment of underexpanded stents: the international; multicentre CRUNCH registry
Tovar Forero M et al
free
45.3

Clinical research

10.4244/EIJ-D-18-01126 Aug 29, 2019
New-generation mechanical circulatory support during high-risk PCI: a cross-sectional analysis
Ameloot K et al
free
43.4

Clinical research

10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00590 Dec 4, 2023
Prognostic impact of cardiac damage staging classification in each aortic stenosis subtype undergoing TAVI
Nakase M et al
free
X

The Official Journal of EuroPCR and the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI)

EuroPCR EAPCI
PCR ESC
Impact factor: 7.6
2023 Journal Citation Reports®
Science Edition (Clarivate Analytics, 2024)
Online ISSN 1969-6213 - Print ISSN 1774-024X
© 2005-2024 Europa Group - All rights reserved