Research Correspondence

DOI: 10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00743

Final report of the PROTEMBO C Trial: a prospective evaluation of a novel cerebral protection device during TAVI

Simone Fezzi1, MD, MSc; Dariusz Jagielak2, MD, PhD; Radoslaw Targonski2, MD, PhD; Tobias Schmidt3, MD, PhD; Christian Frerker3, MD, PhD; Adam Ryszard Witkowski4, MD, PhD; Michael Lauterbach5, MD, PhD; Juergen Leick5, MD, PhD; Andrejs Erglis6, MD, PhD; Inga Narbute6, MD, PhD; Marek Grygier7, MD, PhD; Marcin Misterski7, MD, PhD; Derk Frank8, MD, PhD; Mohamed Abdel-Wahab9, MD, PhD; Johannes Wilde9, MD, PhD; Matti Adam10, MD, PhD; Fernando Gatto11, MD, PhD; Robert Zivadinov12, MD, PhD; Michael Dwyer12, PhD; Nikos Werner5, MD, PhD; Darren Mylotte1, MD, PhD

New cerebral lesions detected with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are reported in 67-100% of patients after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI)1. Large population-based studies associate such MRI lesions with cognitive decline, stroke, and mortality2. The embolisation of debris originating from the aortic root and arch are considered responsible for most periprocedural lesions; hence, cerebral embolic protection (CEP) devices were developed to capture/deflect debris en route to the cerebral circulation.

The PROTEMBO C Trial was an international, multicentre, single-arm trial evaluating the safety and feasibility of the ProtEmbo (Protembis GmbH) CEP system, compared to historical controls (non-inferiority). The COVID-19 pandemic interrupted the PROTEMBO C Trial, and interim results were reported3. This correspondence reflects the final presentation of the results from the completed study in compliance with the original study protocol.

Patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis undergoing transfemoral TAVI were eligible for inclusion. The primary safety endpoint was the incidence of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) at 30 days and was compared to a performance goal (PG) of 25%, derived from historical data. A sample size of 60...

Sign in to read
the full article

Forgot your password?
No account yet?
Sign up for free!

Create my pcr account

Join us for free and access thousands of articles from EuroIntervention, as well as presentations, videos, cases from PCRonline.com

Volume 20 Number 4
Feb 19, 2024
Volume 20 Number 4
View full issue


Key metrics

On the same subject

Short report

10.4244/EIJ-D-19-00741 Aug 7, 2020
A pilot study with the TriGUARD 3 cerebral embolic protection device
Magalhaes P et al
free

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00166 Sep 18, 2023
Cerebral embolic protection during transcatheter heart interventions
Jimenez Diaz VA et al
free

CLINICAL RESEARCH

10.4244/EIJV12I4A84 Jul 20, 2016
Filter-based cerebral embolic protection with transcatheter aortic valve implantation: the randomised MISTRAL-C trial
Van Mieghem NM et al
free

EXPERT REVIEW

10.4244/EIJ-D-18-00454 Sep 7, 2018
TAVI and the brain: update on definitions, evidence of neuroprotection and adjunctive pharmacotherapy
Lansky AJ et al
free

Clinical research

10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00465 Dec 18, 2023
First-in-human study of the CAPTIS embolic protection system during transcatheter aortic valve replacement
Danenberg H et al

Viewpoint

10.4244/EIJ-E-22-00037 Oct 7, 2022
What is the future role of cerebral embolic protection in transcatheter aortic valve implantation?
Søndergaard L et al
free
Trending articles
338.63

State-of-the-Art Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00904 Apr 1, 2022
Antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention
Angiolillo D et al
free
295.45

Expert consensus

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00898 Sep 20, 2022
Intravascular ultrasound guidance for lower extremity arterial and venous interventions
Secemsky E et al
free
226.03

State-of-the-Art Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00426 Dec 3, 2021
Myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary artery disease
Lindahl B et al
free
209.5

State-of-the-Art Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-01034 Jun 3, 2022
Management of in-stent restenosis
Alfonso F et al
free
168.4

Expert review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00690 May 15, 2022
Crush techniques for percutaneous coronary intervention of bifurcation lesions
Moroni F et al
free
149.53

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-22-00776 Apr 3, 2023
Computed tomographic angiography in coronary artery disease
Serruys PW et al
free
103.48

Expert consensus

10.4244/EIJ-E-22-00018 Dec 4, 2023
Definitions and Standardized Endpoints for Treatment of Coronary Bifurcations
Lunardi M et al
free
X

The Official Journal of EuroPCR and the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI)

EuroPCR EAPCI
PCR ESC
Impact factor: 6.2
2022 Journal Citation Reports®
Science Edition (Clarivate Analytics, 2023)
Online ISSN 1969-6213 - Print ISSN 1774-024X
© 2005-2024 Europa Group - All rights reserved