Flashlight

DOI: 10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00927

Chimney/snorkel stenting during TAV-in-TAV: bedside to bench

Christopher L. Brown1, MD; Jeremy White1, MD; Curtiss T. Stinis1, MD; Paul S. Teirstein1, MD

A 92-year-old female with prior transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) with a 26 mm CoreValve bioprosthesis (Medtronic) was admitted for worsening dyspÂnoea, home oxygen requirement, and a mean gradient of 39 mmHg, six years after the TAVI procedure. Transoesophageal echocardiography and computed tomography (CT) imaging showed no leaflet thrombosis but a severely calcified and degenerated transcatheter aortic valve (TAV).

Given her age and comorbidities, the patient was deemed to be at prohibitive risk for surgery. CT scans showed a high risk for sinus sequestration during TAV-in-TAV due to a low and narrow sinotubular junction (Figure 1A). Commissural misalignment of the initial TAV prohibited leaflet modification treatments. A Heart Team decision was made for chimney stenting (also called snorkel stenting) in both coronaries to preserve coronary patency. TAV-in-TAV was performed using a 23 mm SAPIEN 3 (S3) valve (Edwards Lifesciences) with the S3 outflow at CoreValve node 4 (Moving image 1). Chimney stenting successfully maintained coronary patency (Figure 1B, Moving image 2).

A clinical discussion of optimal cell access and concern for chimney stent deformation if stents were placed between the two TAV frames led us to retrospectively evaluate the clinical case on the bench. A heart valve pulse duplicator system (Heartroid [JMC Corporation]) and a 3D-printed patient-specific anatomy model were used (Figure 1C). A 26 mm Evolut R valve (Medtronic) was initially deployed, followed by the placement of 3.5x30 mm and 4.5x15 mm stents in the right and left coronaries, respectively. Coronary stents were wired through nodes 3-5 of the Evolut R valve, which placed them between the two TAV frames (Figure 1D). A 23 mm S3 valve was implanted with the S3 outflow aimed at Evolut R node 4; the final position was closer to node 5 (Moving image 3). After chimney stent deployment, the two TAV frames appeared to be crushing the left stent (Moving image 4). Post-dilation failed to fully resolve the left stent distortion. Fluoroscopic (Figure 1E) and micro-CT imaging (Figure 1F, Moving image 5) confirmed successful chimney technique of the right stent with external compression of the left stent.

The authors believe this work demonstrates the following: 1) coronary wires should be directed through the most superior index TAV cell feasible, 2) coronary stent cell-crossing height and second TAV placement are crucial for the procedural success of chimney stenting, and 3) preprocedural CT planning and in vitro models may help determine the optimal pathway for chimney stent placement during TAV-in-TAV.

Figure 1. Chimney/snorkel stenting during TAV-in-TAV. A) CT case planning of TAV-in-TAV; B) Angiogram confirming coronary patency after chimney stenting during TAV-in-TAV; C) Patient-specific benchtop model; D) Coronary protection setup with guiding catheter, wire and undeployed coronary stents; E) Bench fluoroscopic image; and F) Micro-CT reconstruction. CT: computed tomography; LCA: left coronary artery; RCA: right coronary artery; TAV: transcatheter aortic valve

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge the technical contributions from Akankshya Shradhanjali, PhD, Jorge Zhingre Sanchez, PhD, and John Horrigan, PhD (all employees of Medtronic). Andres Caballero, PhD, and Sruti Bheri, PhD, (both employees of Medtronic) provided editorial support under the direction of the lead author.

Conflict of interest statement

C.L. Brown serves as a consultant to Medtronic. J. White serves as a consultant to Medtronic. C.T. Stinis is a speaker and proctor for Edwards Lifesciences. P.S. Teirstein receives speaking and consulting fees from Medtronic and Boston Scientific.

Supplementary data

To read the full content of this article, please download the PDF.

Moving image 1. Deployment of a 23 mm SAPIEN 3 inside a 26 mm CoreValve. SAPIEN 3 deployment at CoreValve node 4. SAPIEN 3 rides up the left ventricular outflow tract despite forward force during deployment.

Moving image 2. Perfusion of right and left coronary arteries following TAV-in-TAV. Flow detected through both left and right coronaries after deployment of both chimney stents.

Moving image 3. In vitro deployment of a 23 mm SAPIEN 3 within a 26 mm Evolut R. SAPIEN 3 deployed between Evolut R nodes 4 and 5 after both left and right coronary stents were in position.

Moving image 4. TAV-in-TAV before and after coronary stent deployment. Top view of the SAPIEN 3 functioning within the index Evolut R and deployed left and right coronary stents.

Moving image 5. Micro-CT imaging of a 23 mm SAPIEN 3 within a 26 mm Evolut R after chimney stenting technique.

Volume 20 Number 11
Jun 3, 2024
Volume 20 Number 11
View full issue


Key metrics

Suggested by Cory

Image – Interventional flashlight

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-01004 Jul 22, 2022
Chimney kissing stenting after transcatheter aortic valve implantation
Kalogeropoulos A et al
free

10.4244/EIJV16I2A15 Jun 12, 2020
TAV-in-TAV for failed prosthesis: the new frontier
Tchétché D and Siddiqui S
free

Research correspondence

10.4244/EIJ-D-22-00740 Apr 24, 2023
Procedural considerations for transcatheter aortic valve-in-valve implantation in a degenerated ACURATE neo prosthesis
Vanhaverbeke M et al
free

Short report

10.4244/EIJ-D-19-01094 Jun 12, 2020
TAVR-in-TAVR and coronary access: importance of preprocedural planning
Tarantini G et al
free

Image – Interventional flashlight

10.4244/EIJ-D-22-00385 Jan 23, 2023
Double chimney stenting without contrast during transcatheter aortic valve-in-valve implantation
Armario X et al
free

10.4244/EIJV7I1A25 May 17, 2011
How should I treat acute valve regurgitation?
Schultz C et al
free

INTERVENTIONAL FLASHLIGHT

10.4244/EIJ-D-17-00850 Jun 14, 2018
Transcatheter aortic valve-in-valve treatment in prior Sorin Freedom Solo valve
Rahman MS et al
free

10.4244/EIJV14I2A24 Jun 20, 2018
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: don’t forget the coronary arteries!
Søndergaard L and De Backer O
free
Trending articles
309.93

State-of-the-Art Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00695 Nov 19, 2021
Transcatheter treatment for tricuspid valve disease
Praz F et al
free
166.7

Expert review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00690 May 15, 2022
Crush techniques for percutaneous coronary intervention of bifurcation lesions
Moroni F et al
free
92.2

State-of-the-Art Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-20-01296 Aug 27, 2021
Management of cardiogenic shock
Thiele H et al
free
76

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00840 Sep 2, 2024
Aortic regurgitation: from mechanisms to management
Baumbach A et al
free
72.85

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00386 Feb 3, 2025
Mechanical circulatory support for complex, high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention
Ferro E et al
free
58.3

Clinical research

10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00344 Sep 18, 2023
Clinical outcomes of TAVI with the Myval balloon-expandable valve for non-calcified aortic regurgitation
Sanchez-Luna JP et al
free
56.65

Clinical research

10.4244/EIJ-D-20-01155 Oct 20, 2021
A deep learning algorithm for detecting acute myocardial infarction
Liu W et al
free
33.9

CLINICAL RESEARCH

10.4244/EIJ-D-17-00381 Oct 11, 2017
Stent malapposition and the risk of stent thrombosis: mechanistic insights from an in vitro model
Foin N et al
free
33.65

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00606 Jan 1, 2024
Targeting inflammation in atherosclerosis: overview, strategy and directions
Waksman R et al
free
X

The Official Journal of EuroPCR and the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI)

EuroPCR EAPCI
PCR ESC
Impact factor: 7.6
2023 Journal Citation Reports®
Science Edition (Clarivate Analytics, 2024)
Online ISSN 1969-6213 - Print ISSN 1774-024X
© 2005-2025 Europa Group - All rights reserved