DOI: 10.4244/EIJ-D-16-01000R

Chemical sympathetic denervation: promising, but important distinctions between agents and methods

Stefan Bertog1*, MD; Félix Vega2, VMD; Vartan Ghazarossian3, PhD; Atul Pathak4, MD, PhD; Laura Vaskelyte1, MD; Horst Sievert1, MD; Elena Ladich5, MD; Kazuyuki Yahagi5, MD; Renu Virmani5, MD

We read with great interest the letter to the editor by Toutouzas et al and agree with the stated limitations regarding radiofrequency (RF)-mediated renal denervation as performed in studies using a single electrode RF catheter in the manner applied in SYMPLICITY-HTN 3, including the potential for vascular injury. Of equal importance, however, is the probable technique-dependent efficacy. It is possible that the limited tissue injury depth that can safely be achieved with RF ablation without protection of the intima in the main stem renal arteries together with the limited number of ablations contributed to the absence of a blood pressure-lowering effect in SYMPLICITY-HTN 31. The recently announced interim results of the SPYRAL HTN-OFF MED trial2 may support this hypothesis. In this randomised sham-controlled trial in patients off antihypertensive medications, a blood pressure-lowering effect was seen in patients treated with RF ablation predominantly of segmental renal arteries using a larger number of ablation points than in prior randomised trials using a single electrode. Apart from patient selection and other factors, one reason may have been more complete renal nerve injury in segmental renal arteries due to the closer location of the renal nerves to the arteries in this location3 compared with the main stem renal artery. This may support the notion that more complete denervation may lead to more pronounced blood pressure lowering. Herein lies the potential advantage of perivascular alcohol infusion compared with RF-based renal denervation, i.e., deeper tissue injury4 reaching the majority of renal sympathetic nerves (in a more circumferential manner4), allowing more complete renal nerve injury while limiting injury to the vessel wall. Though vincristine may be used to cause nerve injury including the renal sympathetic nerves, there are several important distinctions, regarding both the potential systemic effects of the agent used and the methods of delivery to the renal sympathetic nerves comparing the concept described by Stefanadis et al5 and the Peregrine System™ Infusion Catheter (Ablative Solutions, Inc., Kalamazoo, MI, USA)6. First, while the systemic concentration may be low and neurotoxic effects at sites other than the renal artery unlikely, data regarding the safety of vincristine even in very low systemic concentrations are limited, whereas, in the amounts used by the Peregrine System (total of 0.6-1.2 ml for both renal arteries), even if all entered the systemic circulation, the effects of alcohol would be comparable to consumption of far less than a glass of wine. Second, the delivery of alcohol by the Peregrine System occurs by injection via ultra-fine needles entering the renal artery adventitia and immediate surroundings in a predictable and circumferential manner whereas the delivery of vincristine as described by Stefanadis et al is achieved via an inflated balloon5, potentially risking intimal injury. Third, though renal sympathetic nerve injury has been demonstrated using a balloon to distribute vincristine as described by Stefanadis et al5, the injury depth and circumferential nature have not been well studied. Hence, while both agents and methods of delivery described may cause effective chemical renal sympathetic denervation and merit further study, the chemical properties of alcohol and vincristine are different, as are the methods of delivery and, therefore, perhaps safety and efficacy.

Conflict of interest statement

S. Bertog, H. Sievert and L. Vaskelyte’s institution have ownership interest in or have received consulting fees, travel expenses or study honoraria from the following companies: Abbott, Ablative Solutions Inc., Access Closure, AGA, Angiomed, Arstasis, Atritech, Atrium, Avinger, Bard, Boston Scientific, BridgePoint, Cardiac Dimensions, CardioKinetix, CardioMEMS, Coherex, Contego, CSI, EndoCross, EndoTex, Epitek, Evalve, ev3, FlowCardia, Gore, Guidant, Guided Delivery Systems, Inc., InSeal Medical, Lumen Biomedical, HLT, Kensey Nash, Kyoto Medical, Lifetech, Lutonix, Medinol, Medtronic, NDC, NMT, OAS, Occlutech, Osprey, Ovalis, Pathway, PendraCare, Percardia, pfm medical, Rox Medical, Sadra, SJM, Sorin, Spectranetics, SquareOne, Trireme, Trivascular, Velocimed, Veryan. V. Ghazarossian, F. Vega, E. Ladich, K. Yahagi, and R. Virmani have received consulting fees from Ablative Solutions Inc. A. Pathak has provided consulting services to Ablative Solutions Inc.


References

Volume 13 Number 9
Oct 11, 2017
Volume 13 Number 9
View full issue


Key metrics

On the same subject

10.4244/EIJ-D-16-01000L Oct 11, 2017
Chemical renal denervation: an effective method to treat resistant hypertension?
Toutouzas K et al
free

Editorial

10.4244/EIJ-E-23-00036 Sep 18, 2023
Learning the lessons (again) of the challenges of conducting sham-controlled device trials in hypertension
Sharp AS and Kirtane AJ
free

10.4244/EIJV14I12A225 Dec 20, 2018
Renal artery denervation: a lot done and more to do
Sharif F
free

10.4244/EIJV12I18A355 Apr 7, 2017
Renal denervation for treatment of hypertension – will 2017 be the year of enlightenment?
Mahfoud F and Edelman ER
free

10.4244/EIJV16I1A4 May 20, 2020
Radiofrequency renal denervation is effective – and safe?
Mahfoud F and Kulenthiran S
free
Trending articles
281.88

State-of-the-Art Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00695 Nov 19, 2021
Transcatheter treatment for tricuspid valve disease
Praz F et al
free
243.2

State of the art

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-01117 Sep 20, 2022
Recanalisation of coronary chronic total occlusions
Di Mario C et al
free
208.35

State-of-the-Art Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-01034 Jun 3, 2022
Management of in-stent restenosis
Alfonso F et al
free
168.7

Translational research

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00824 May 15, 2022
Bench test and in vivo evaluation of longitudinal stent deformation during proximal optimisation
Toth GG et al
free
167.05

Expert review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00690 May 15, 2022
Crush techniques for percutaneous coronary intervention of bifurcation lesions
Moroni F et al
free
151.03

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-22-00776 Apr 3, 2023
Computed tomographic angiography in coronary artery disease
Serruys PW et al
free
118

Translational research

10.4244/EIJ-D-22-00718 Jun 5, 2023
Preclinical evaluation of the degradation kinetics of third-generation resorbable magnesium scaffolds
Seguchi M et al
110.35

Viewpoint

10.4244/EIJ-E-22-00007 May 15, 2022
TAVI at 20: how a crazy idea led to a clinical revolution
Eltchaninoff H et al
free
X

The Official Journal of EuroPCR and the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI)

EuroPCR EAPCI
PCR ESC
Impact factor: 6.2
2022 Journal Citation Reports®
Science Edition (Clarivate Analytics, 2023)
Online ISSN 1969-6213 - Print ISSN 1774-024X
© 2005-2024 Europa Group - All rights reserved