IMAGE IN CARDIOLOGY

DOI: 10.4244/EIJV12I9A89

Acquired coronary artery aneurysm following treatment with bioresorbable vascular scaffolds

Kevin O’Gallagher*, BA (Hons), MBBS, MRCP; Roberto Nerla, PhD; Jonathan Hill, MA, MBChb, FRCP; Jonathan Byrne, MBChB, PhD, FRCP

A 41-year-old female underwent deployment of two bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVS) (3.5×28 mm, 3.5×18 mm) (Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, CA, USA) to a long segment of disease in the right coronary artery (RCA) as a staged intervention to bystander disease following a myocardial infarction. Due to a significant waist post deployment, post-dilation with 3.5×20 mm Pantera (Biotronik, Berlin, Germany) and 3.5×12 mm Quantum Apex™ (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA, USA) non-compliant balloons to 18 atm was required.

She re-presented with angina 21 months later. Angiography revealed a significant ostial RCA stenosis, with a localised coronary artery aneurysm within the scaffolded segment (Panel A). Pressure wire assessment yielded an FFR of 0.76 with a step at the ostium. Optical coherence tomography confirmed a large, acquired aneurysm at the point of minimal scaffold overlap (Panel B, Panel C). No malapposition was observed, and the scaffold appeared to have expanded with the vessel far beyond normal scaffold dimensions. A short drug-eluting stent (DES) was deployed to the ostium. The aneurysmal segment was managed conservatively with dual antiplatelet therapy (aspirin and clopidogrel).

This extreme form of positive remodelling in a BVS has not, to our knowledge, been described previously. The mechanism of acquired aneurysm following DES/BVS deployment remains unclear; however, hypersensitivity to the drug and/or polymer is possible. In this case, it is possible that “double-dose” everolimus at the point of BVS overlap may have been a factor in aneurysm formation.

Conflict of interest statement

J. Hill has received consulting fees from Abbott and St. Jude Medical. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Volume 12 Number 9
Oct 20, 2016
Volume 12 Number 9
View full issue


Key metrics

Suggested by Cory

IMAGE IN CARDIOLOGY

10.4244/EIJV12I1A10 May 16, 2016
Coronary aneurysm without malapposition after bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation
Timmers L et al
free

IMAGE IN CARDIOLOGY

10.4244/EIJV11I1A14 May 19, 2015
Very late bioresorbable vascular scaffold thrombosis: a new clinical entity
Azzalini L et al
free

IMAGE IN CARDIOLOGY

10.4244/EIJ-D-16-00323 Jan 20, 2017
Delayed fracture of a bioresorbable vascular scaffold implanted for in-stent restenosis
Bastante T et al
free
Trending articles
335.05

State-of-the-Art Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00904 Apr 1, 2022
Antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention
Angiolillo D et al
free
84.05

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00840 Sep 2, 2024
Aortic regurgitation: from mechanisms to management
Baumbach A et al
free
49.35

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-25-00874 Jun 1, 2026
TAVI and coronary interventions: indications, technical considerations, and clinical scenarios
Aquino Bruno H et al
free
45.65

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-25-01346 May 4, 2026
Slow flow and no reflow after percutaneous coronary intervention
Brugaletta S et al
free
38.2

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00195 Apr 7, 2025
Percutaneous coronary intervention for calcified and resistant lesions
Pesarini G et al
free
33.9

Original Research

10.4244/EIJ-D-26-00032 May 15, 2026
Glucocorticoids to reduce permanent pacemaker implantation after TAVI: the GLUCO-TAVI randomised trial
Fuertes-Kenneally L et al
X

PCR
Impact factor: 9.2
2025 Journal Citation Reports®
Science Edition (Clarivate Analytics, 2026)
Online ISSN 1969-6213 - Print ISSN 1774-024X
© 2005-2026 Europa Group - All rights reserved