IMAGE IN CARDIOLOGY

DOI: 10.4244/EIJV12I1A10

Coronary aneurysm without malapposition after bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation

Leo Timmers1,2*, MD, PhD; Yoke Ching Lim1, MBChB, MRCP; Huay Cheem Tan1, MBBS, MMed (Int Med), FRCP, FACC, FAMS; Adrian F. Low1, MBBS

A 54-year-old male underwent coronary angiography for non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction. This identified significant left anterior descending artery (LAD) disease (Panel A, Moving image 1). After predilatation with a 3×15 mm balloon, a type B dissection occurred (Panel B, Moving image 2). Two Absorb™ bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVS) (Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, CA, USA) were implanted in the mid (3×18 mm at 16 atm) and proximal (3.5×28 mm at 6 atm) LAD (Panel C, Moving image 3). After post-dilatation with a 3.5×15 mm non-compliant balloon at 18 atm, the vessel diameter was 3.5 mm. Thirty-two months later, a coronary angiogram showed a segment of ectasia in the proximal and mid LAD, with a maximal vessel diameter of 5.3 mm (Panel D, Moving image 4). Optical coherence tomography demonstrated the absence of strut malapposition. Instead, completely endothelialised strut remnants were visible in the positively remodelled vessel wall (Panel E, 3D reconstruction, Panel F, distal reference, Panel G, ectatic segment, Panel H, proximal reference, Moving image 5). This suggests that the scaffold was incorporated into the vessel wall and that gradual degradation of the scaffold resulted in disruption of strut continuity, allowing outward strut displacement along with the enlarging coronary artery. Positive remodelling causing late acquired metallic DES malapposition has been recognised as a potential cause for very late stent thrombosis. This image demonstrates that coronary aneurysm formation can occur after BVS implantation. However, in contrast to metallic DES, the transient nature of BVS integrity can result in the absence of late strut malapposition. Whether this entails a lower risk of very late thrombosis after positive coronary arterial remodelling remains uncertain.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Supplementary data

Moving image 1. Baseline coronary angiogram.

Moving image 2. Coronary angiogram after balloon dilatation.

Moving image 3. Angiographic result after BVS implantation.

Moving image 4. Angiogram 32 months after BVS implantation.

Moving image 5. Optical coherence tomography.

Supplementary data

To read the full content of this article, please download the PDF.

Baseline coronary angiogram.

Coronary angiogram after balloon dilatation.

Angiographic result after BVS implantation.

Angiogram 32 months after BVS implantation.

Optical coherence tomography.

Volume 12 Number 1
May 16, 2016
Volume 12 Number 1
View full issue


Key metrics

On the same subject

Editorial

10.4244/EIJ-E-24-00010 Apr 15, 2024
Timing of revascularisation in acute coronary syndromes with multivessel disease – two sides of the same coin
Stähli B and Stehli J
free

Editorial

10.4244/EIJ-E-24-00016 Apr 15, 2024
Can artificial intelligence help Heart Teams make decisions?
Koch V
free

Editorial

10.4244/EIJ-E-24-00006 Apr 15, 2024
The miracle of left ventricular recovery after transcatheter aortic valve implantation
Dauerman H and Lahoud R
free

Original Research

10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00643 Apr 15, 2024
A study of ChatGPT in facilitating Heart Team decisions on severe aortic stenosis
Salihu A et al

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00836 Apr 15, 2024
Renal denervation in the management of hypertension
Lauder L et al
free
Trending articles
338.03

State-of-the-Art Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00904 Apr 1, 2022
Antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention
Angiolillo D et al
free
284.93

State-of-the-Art Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00695 Nov 19, 2021
Transcatheter treatment for tricuspid valve disease
Praz F et al
free
226.03

State-of-the-Art Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00426 Dec 3, 2021
Myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary artery disease
Lindahl B et al
free
209.5

State-of-the-Art Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-01034 Jun 3, 2022
Management of in-stent restenosis
Alfonso F et al
free
168.4

Expert review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00690 May 15, 2022
Crush techniques for percutaneous coronary intervention of bifurcation lesions
Moroni F et al
free
150.28

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-22-00776 Apr 3, 2023
Computed tomographic angiography in coronary artery disease
Serruys PW et al
free
118

Translational research

10.4244/EIJ-D-22-00718 Jun 5, 2023
Preclinical evaluation of the degradation kinetics of third-generation resorbable magnesium scaffolds
Seguchi M et al
X

The Official Journal of EuroPCR and the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI)

EuroPCR EAPCI
PCR ESC
Impact factor: 6.2
2022 Journal Citation Reports®
Science Edition (Clarivate Analytics, 2023)
Online ISSN 1969-6213 - Print ISSN 1774-024X
© 2005-2024 Europa Group - All rights reserved