IMAGE IN CARDIOLOGY

DOI: 10.4244/EIJV12I1A10

Coronary aneurysm without malapposition after bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation

Leo Timmers1,2*, MD, PhD; Yoke Ching Lim1, MBChB, MRCP; Huay Cheem Tan1, MBBS, MMed (Int Med), FRCP, FACC, FAMS; Adrian F. Low1, MBBS

A 54-year-old male underwent coronary angiography for non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction. This identified significant left anterior descending artery (LAD) disease (Panel A, Moving image 1). After predilatation with a 3×15 mm balloon, a type B dissection occurred (Panel B, Moving image 2). Two Absorb™ bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVS) (Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, CA, USA) were implanted in the mid (3×18 mm at 16 atm) and proximal (3.5×28 mm at 6 atm) LAD (Panel C, Moving image 3). After post-dilatation with a 3.5×15 mm non-compliant balloon at 18 atm, the vessel diameter was 3.5 mm. Thirty-two months later, a coronary angiogram showed a segment of ectasia in the proximal and mid LAD, with a maximal vessel diameter of 5.3 mm (Panel D, Moving image 4). Optical coherence tomography demonstrated the absence of strut malapposition. Instead, completely endothelialised strut remnants were visible in the positively remodelled vessel wall (Panel E, 3D reconstruction, Panel F, distal reference, Panel G, ectatic segment, Panel H, proximal reference, Moving image 5). This suggests that the scaffold was incorporated into the vessel wall and that gradual degradation of the scaffold resulted in disruption of strut continuity, allowing outward strut displacement along with the enlarging coronary artery. Positive remodelling causing late acquired metallic DES malapposition has been recognised as a potential cause for very late stent thrombosis. This image demonstrates that coronary aneurysm formation can occur after BVS implantation. However, in contrast to metallic DES, the transient nature of BVS integrity can result in the absence of late strut malapposition. Whether this entails a lower risk of very late thrombosis after positive coronary arterial remodelling remains uncertain.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Supplementary data

Moving image 1. Baseline coronary angiogram.

Moving image 2. Coronary angiogram after balloon dilatation.

Moving image 3. Angiographic result after BVS implantation.

Moving image 4. Angiogram 32 months after BVS implantation.

Moving image 5. Optical coherence tomography.

Supplementary data

To read the full content of this article, please download the PDF.

Baseline coronary angiogram.

Coronary angiogram after balloon dilatation.

Angiographic result after BVS implantation.

Angiogram 32 months after BVS implantation.

Optical coherence tomography.

Volume 12 Number 1
May 16, 2016
Volume 12 Number 1
View full issue


Key metrics

Suggested by Cory

IMAGE IN CARDIOLOGY

10.4244/EIJV12I9A89 Oct 20, 2016
Acquired coronary artery aneurysm following treatment with bioresorbable vascular scaffolds
O’Gallagher K et al
free

SHORT REPORT

10.4244/EIJ-D-17-00353 Apr 6, 2018
Very late scaffold thrombosis: insights from optical coherence tomography and histopathology
Joner M et al
free

IMAGE IN CARDIOLOGY

10.4244/EIJV12I7A142 Sep 18, 2016
Plaque protrusion compromising bioresorbable coronary scaffold patency
Floré V et al
free

EXPERT REVIEW

10.4244/EIJ-D-16-00471 Feb 20, 2017
Possible mechanical causes of scaffold thrombosis: insights from case reports with intracoronary imaging
Sotomi Y et al
free

IMAGE IN CARDIOLOGY

10.4244/EIJ-D-16-00259 Mar 20, 2017
Neoatherosclerosis: an emerging and conceptually unexpected cause of very late bioresorbable vascular scaffold failure
Hiltrop N et al
free

Image – Interventional flashlight

10.4244/EIJ-D-19-00063 Jan 20, 2021
Late structural discontinuity after bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation in patients with in-stent restenosis
Cuesta J et al
free

IMAGE IN CARDIOLOGY

10.4244/EIJ-D-16-00323 Jan 20, 2017
Delayed fracture of a bioresorbable vascular scaffold implanted for in-stent restenosis
Bastante T et al
free
Trending articles
151.43

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-22-00776 Apr 3, 2023
Computed tomographic angiography in coronary artery disease
Serruys PW et al
free
55.9

Clinical research

10.4244/EIJ-D-22-00621 Feb 20, 2023
Long-term changes in coronary physiology after aortic valve replacement
Sabbah M et al
free
54.9

Expert review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-01010 Jun 24, 2022
Device-related thrombus following left atrial appendage occlusion
Simard T et al
free
43.75

Clinical Research

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-01091 Aug 5, 2022
Lifetime management of patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis: a computed tomography simulation study
Medranda G et al
free
39.95

Clinical research

10.4244/EIJ-D-22-00558 Feb 6, 2023
Permanent pacemaker implantation and left bundle branch block with self-expanding valves – a SCOPE 2 subanalysis
Pellegrini C et al
free
X

The Official Journal of EuroPCR and the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI)

EuroPCR EAPCI
PCR ESC
Impact factor: 7.6
2023 Journal Citation Reports®
Science Edition (Clarivate Analytics, 2024)
Online ISSN 1969-6213 - Print ISSN 1774-024X
© 2005-2024 Europa Group - All rights reserved