Giuseppe Tarantini1, MD, PhD; Luca Nai Fovino1, MD, PhD; Ferdinando Varbella2, MD; Daniela Trabattoni3, MD, PhD; Giuseppe Caramanno4, MD; Carlo Trani5, MD, PhD; Nicoletta De Cesare6, MD; Giovanni Esposito7, MD, PhD; Matteo Montorfano8, MD, PhD; Carmine Musto9, MD; Andrea Picchi10, MD; Imad Sheiban11, MD; Valeria Gasparetto11, MD; Flavio L. Ribichini12, MD; Francesco Cardaioli1, MD; Salvatore Saccà13, MD; Enrico Cerrato14, MD, PhD; Massimo Napodano1, MD, PhD; Matteo Martinato15, MSc, PhD; Danila Azzolina15, MSc, PhD; Giuseppe Andò16, MD; Antonio Mugnolo17, MD; Marco Caruso18, MD; Roberta Rossini19, MD, PhD; Enrico Passamonti20, MD; Rui Campante Teles21, MD; Stefano Rigattieri22, MD, PhD; Dario Gregori15, MSc, PhD; Corrado Tamburino23, MD, PhD; Francesco Burzotta5, MD
1. Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padua, Padua, Italy; 2. Rivoli Infermi Hospital ASL TO3, Rivoli, Turin, Italy; 3. Centro Cardiologico Monzino, IRCCS, Milan, Italy; 4. Ospedale San Giovanni di Dio, Agrigento, Italy; 5. Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli ICCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy; 6. Policlinico San Marco, Zingonia, Italy; 7. University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy; 8. Interventional Cardiology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; 9. Department of Cardiosciences, A.O. San Camillo-Forlanini Hospital, Rome, Italy; 10. Cardiovascular Department, Azienda USL Toscana SudEst, Misericordia Hospital, Grosseto, Italy; 11. Division of Cardiology, Peschiera del Garda Hospital, Verona, Italy; 12. Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Verona, Verona, Italy; 13. Ospedale Civile di Mirano, Mirano, Italy; 14. Interventional Cardiology Unit, San Luigi Gonzaga University Hospital, Orbassano, Italy; 15. Unit of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Padova, Padova, Italy; 16. Division of Cardiology, University of Messina, Messina, Italy; 17. Mater Salutis Hospital Legnago, Legnago, Italy; 18. Division of Cardiology, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy; 19. Division of Cardiology, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, Cuneo, Italy; 20. Division of Cardiology, Azienda Socio-Sanitaria Territoriale di Cremona, Cremona, Italy; 21. Hospital de Santa Cruz, CHLO, Nova Medical School, CEDOC, Lisbon, Portugal; 22. Sandro Pertini Hospital, Rome, Italy; 23. Cardiology, CAST-Policlinico Hospital, Cardio-Thorax-Vascular and Transplant Department, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
Background: Data on left main (LM) percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) have mostly been obtained in studies using drug-eluting stent (DES) platforms without dedicated large-vessel devices and with limited expansion capability.
Aims: Our study aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of LM PCI with the latest-generation Resolute Onyx DES.
Methods: ROLEX (Revascularization Of LEft main with resolute onyX) is a prospective, multicentre study (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03316833) enrolling patients with unprotected LM coronary artery disease and a SYNTAX score <33 undergoing PCI with the Resolute Onyx zotarolimus-eluting coronary stent, that includes dedicated extra-large vessel platforms. The primary endpoint (EP) was target lesion failure (TLF): a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction (TVMI) and ischaemia-driven target lesion revascularisation (ID-TLR), at 1 year. All events were adjudicated by an independent clinical event committee. An independent core lab analysed all procedural angiograms.
Results: A total of 450 patients (mean age 71.8 years, SYNTAX score 24.5±7.2, acute coronary syndrome in 53%) were enrolled in 26 centres. Of these, 77% of subjects underwent PCI with a single-stent and 23% with a 2-stent technique (8% double kissing [DK] crush, 6% culotte, 9% T/T and small protrusion [TAP] stenting). Intravascular imaging guidance was used in 45% (42% intravascular ultrasound [IVUS], 3% optical coherence tomography [OCT]). At 1 year, the primary EP incidence was 5.1% (cardiac death 2.7%, TVMI 2.7%, ID-TLR 2.0%). The definite/probable stent thrombosis rate was 1.1%. In a prespecified adjusted subanalysis, the primary EP incidence was significantly lower in patients undergoing IVUS/OCT-guided versus angio-guided PCI (2.0 vs 7.6%; hazard ratio [HR] 0.28, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.13-0.58; p<0.001).
Conclusions: In this large, multicentre, prospective registry, LM PCI with the Resolute Onyx DES showed good safety and efficacy at 1 year, particularly when guided by intracoronary imaging.
No account yet? Create my pcr account
Sign up for free!
Join us for free and access thousands of articles from EuroIntervention, as well as presentations, videos, cases
drug-eluting stentintracoronary imagingintravascular ultrasoundleft mainpercutaneous coronary intervention
Read next article
Translational value of preclinical models for renal denervation: a histological comparison of human versus porcine renal nerve anatomy