Original Research

DOI: 10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00742

Sirolimus-coated versus paclitaxel-coated balloons for bifurcated coronary lesions in the side branch: the SPACIOUS trial

You Zhou1, MD; Yiqing Hu2, MD; Xin Zhao2, MD; Zhangwei Chen2, MD; Chenguang Li2, PhD; Likun Ma3, MD; Zongjun Liu4, MD; Hao Zhou5, MD; Xiwen Zang6, MD; Xingwei Zhang7, MD; Gaoxing Zhang8, MD; Zhanqian Cui9, MD; Yin Liu10, MD; Suxia Han11, MD; Lianpin Wu12, MD; Haiming Shi13, MD; Jianjun Jiang14, MD; Juying Qian2, MD, PhD; Hao Lu2, PhD; Junbo Ge2, MD, PhD

Abstract

Background: The optimal strategy to treat coronary bifurcation lesions (CBL) has been a long-debated topic. The combination of a stent in the main vessel (MV) and a drug-coated balloon (DCB) in the side branch (SB) seems promising, but the evidence is limited.

Aims: This study aims to investigate a novel sirolimus-coated balloon in the treatment of non-left main CBL compared with a paclitaxel-coated balloon.

Methods: The SPACIOUS trial is a prospective, non-inferiority, multicentre trial. A total of 230 patients were randomised to the sirolimus DCB or the paclitaxel DCB group in a 1:1 ratio. Angiographic and clinical follow-ups were planned at 9 months and 1 year, respectively. The primary endpoint was diameter stenosis (DS) in the SB at 9 months.

Results: At 9 months, DS in the sirolimus group was 30.5±16.1% compared with 33.5±16.2% in the paclitaxel group (difference −2.94%; 95% confidence interval: −7.62% to 1.74%; p for non-inferiority<0.01). The incidence of binary restenosis was significantly lower in the sirolimus group compared to the paclitaxel group (4.4% vs 12.8%; p=0.043). Secondary angiographic endpoints, including late lumen loss and net lumen gain, and 1-year clinical outcomes were not significantly different between groups.

Conclusions: In de novo non-left main CBL treatment, MV stenting accompanied by SB dilation with the sirolimus DCB was non-inferior to the paclitaxel DCB.

Sign in to read
the full article

Forgot your password?
No account yet?
Sign up for free!

Create my pcr account

Join us for free and access thousands of articles from EuroIntervention, as well as presentations, videos, cases from PCRonline.com

Volume 21 Number 6
Mar 17, 2025
Volume 21 Number 6
View full issue


Key metrics

Suggested by Cory

Original Research

10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00868 Nov 4, 2024
A randomised trial of sirolimus- versus paclitaxel-coated balloons for de novo coronary lesions
Scheller B et al
Trending articles
69.996

10.4244/EIJV13I12A217 Dec 8, 2017
Swimming against the tide: insights from the ORBITA trial
Al-Lamee R and Francis D
free
60.9

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00066 Apr 21, 2025
Management of complications after valvular interventions
Bansal A et al
free
57.35

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00386 Feb 3, 2025
Mechanical circulatory support for complex, high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention
Ferro E et al
free
38.75

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00912 Oct 7, 2024
Optical coherence tomography to guide percutaneous coronary intervention
Almajid F et al
free
19.4

Expert Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00535 May 5, 2025
Catheter-based techniques for pulmonary embolism treatment
Costa F et al
X

The Official Journal of EuroPCR and the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI)

EuroPCR EAPCI
PCR ESC
Impact factor: 7.6
2023 Journal Citation Reports®
Science Edition (Clarivate Analytics, 2024)
Online ISSN 1969-6213 - Print ISSN 1774-024X
© 2005-2025 Europa Group - All rights reserved