INTERVENTIONAL FLASHLIGHT

DOI: 10.4244/EIJ-D-17-00578

Valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve implantation into a novel, sutureless bioprosthesis: technical considerations

Martin Andreas1*, MD, PhD; Iuliana Coti1, MD; Guenther Laufer1, MD; Johannes Kastner2, MD

We report the first successful valve-in-valve (ViV) procedure implanting a 23 mm Edwards SAPIEN XT (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA, USA) into the novel rapid-deployment Edwards INTUITY™ Elite valve system (23 mm; Edwards Lifesciences) six years after surgery.

Rapid-deployment aortic valves (RD-AV) were recently implemented into clinical practice, showing good short-term and midterm results1. No experience is currently available for ViV procedures into this novel prosthesis. However, ViV procedures in other sutureless prostheses have already been reported, both after structural degeneration2,3 and in acute failure4 with good results in terms of safety and feasibility. The Edwards INTUITY Elite valve system is a supra-annular prosthesis with a stainless steel cloth-covered frame incorporated into the inflow aspect (Panel A-Panel C). The implantation requires three sutures, while the balloon-expandable frame establishes a seal within the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT). Through a transfemoral approach, under fluoroscopic guidance (Panel D, Panel E), the Edwards SAPIEN XT was placed co-axial to the ring of the bioprosthesis (Moving image 1). It is crucial to obtain a proper alignment considering as a reference the bioprosthesis’ surgical ring (Panel A, Panel B, Panel F-Panel I, arrows indicating the ring in the lateral view) and not the stent frame of the valve, which lies within the LVOT (Panel A, red marker). We recommend using the sizing provided for the Magna valve5 (Edwards Lifesciences) also when using an INTUITY Elite valve due to the fact that the valves are very similar and the inner diameters are comparable. Therefore, a 23 mm Edwards SAPIEN XT valve was chosen.

After the primary deployment, a remaining moderate aortic insufficiency was observed. After post-dilatation, a trivial to mild regurgitation without significant haemodynamic effect was assessed (Moving image 2). No coronary obstruction was observed. The mean post-procedural gradient was 13 mmHg and remained below 15 mmHg at three-month and one-year follow-up. The patient was discharged three days after the procedure. Currently, this is the first patient with a degenerated RD-AV among more than 500 patients implanted up until now in our centre. The most important finding is that the anchoring of the SAPIEN XT valve in the INTUITY Elite prosthesis was achieved without problems. No change in the conformation of the INTUITY Elite stent frame occurred during implantation (Panel G, Panel H). Therefore, TAVR ViV procedures are technically feasible in patients who previously received an Edwards INTUITY Elite aortic valve prosthesis.

Conflict of interest statement

M. Andreas received a research grant and travel costs from Edwards Lifesciences. G. Laufer received consulting fees from Edwards Lifesciences. I. Coti received travel costs from Edwards Lifesciences. J. Kastner received speaking fees from Edwards Lifesciences.

Supplementary data

Moving image 1. Transcatheter valve implantation.

Moving image 2. Post-implant angiogram.

Supplementary data

To read the full content of this article, please download the PDF.

Moving image 1. Transcatheter valve implantation.

Moving image 2. Post-implant angiogram.

Volume 13 Number 16
Mar 20, 2018
Volume 13 Number 16
View full issue


Key metrics

On the same subject

IMAGE IN CARDIOLOGY

10.4244/EIJV11I11A255 Feb 12, 2016
Edwards SAPIEN 3 implanted in a failing aortic bioprosthesis: first report
Molina-Martin de Nicolas J et al
free

Clinical research

10.4244/EIJ-D-18-00752 May 20, 2019
Transcatheter aortic valve-in-valve implantation in degenerative rapid deployment bioprostheses
Landes U et al
free

Image – Interventional flashlight

10.4244/EIJ-D-20-00426 Sep 18, 2020
Technical considerations for repeat transcatheter aortic valve implantation in a failing Direct Flow Medical transcatheter heart valve
Yap J et al
free

SPECIAL REPORT

10.4244/EIJY15M07_05 Apr 20, 2016
Direct Flow valve-in-valve implantation in a degenerated mitral bioprosthesis
Bruschi G et al
free
Trending articles
338.03

State-of-the-Art Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00904 Apr 1, 2022
Antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention
Angiolillo D et al
free
284.93

State-of-the-Art Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00695 Nov 19, 2021
Transcatheter treatment for tricuspid valve disease
Praz F et al
free
226.03

State-of-the-Art Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00426 Dec 3, 2021
Myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary artery disease
Lindahl B et al
free
209.5

State-of-the-Art Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-01034 Jun 3, 2022
Management of in-stent restenosis
Alfonso F et al
free
168.4

Expert review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00690 May 15, 2022
Crush techniques for percutaneous coronary intervention of bifurcation lesions
Moroni F et al
free
150.28

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-22-00776 Apr 3, 2023
Computed tomographic angiography in coronary artery disease
Serruys PW et al
free
118

Translational research

10.4244/EIJ-D-22-00718 Jun 5, 2023
Preclinical evaluation of the degradation kinetics of third-generation resorbable magnesium scaffolds
Seguchi M et al
X

The Official Journal of EuroPCR and the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI)

EuroPCR EAPCI
PCR ESC
Impact factor: 6.2
2022 Journal Citation Reports®
Science Edition (Clarivate Analytics, 2023)
Online ISSN 1969-6213 - Print ISSN 1774-024X
© 2005-2024 Europa Group - All rights reserved