Editorial

DOI: 10.4244/EIJ-E-24-00030

Ultrasound is not the panacea for transfemoral access complications

Sanjit S. Jolly1,2, MD, MSc; Marc-André d'Entremont1,2,3, MD, MPH

Compared to radial access, femoral access has been shown to increase bleeding and vascular complications in stable ischaemic heart disease and even mortality in acute coronary syndrome patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)1. However, transfemoral access (TFA) remains necessary for larger-bore complex procedures and in cases of radial access failure2. Precise cannulation of the common femoral artery is essential, as punctures higher than the inguinal ligament increase the risk for retroperitoneal haemorrhage, while punctures below the femoral bifurcation increase the risk for pseudoaneurysms, arteriovenous fistulas and acute limb ischaemia2. Ultrasound (US) guidance has emerged as an effective adjunct to increase TFA safety and procedural efficacy. The recent Routine Ultrasound Guidance for Vascular Access for Cardiac Procedures: a Randomized Trial (UNIVERSAL) did not demonstrate a benefit of US guidance over no US guidance for TFA regarding access site complications3. However, a follow-up meta-analysis suggested a benefit based on the totality of the evidence4.

In this issue of EuroIntervention, Meijers et al report the results of the Ultrasound Guided Transfemoral Large-bore Trial (ULTRACOLOR), in which 554 patients undergoing...

Sign in to read
the full article

Forgot your password?
No account yet?
Sign up for free!

Create my pcr account

Join us for free and access thousands of articles from EuroIntervention, as well as presentations, videos, cases from PCRonline.com

Volume 20 Number 14
Jul 15, 2024
Volume 20 Number 14
View full issue


Key metrics

Suggested by Cory

Editorial

10.4244/EIJ-E-24-00030 May 14, 2024
Ultrasound is not the panacea for transfemoral access complications
Jolly S and d'Entremont M
free

Editorial

10.4244/EIJ-E-25-00010 Apr 7, 2025
Defining what is important to prevent radial artery occlusion
Rao S and Razzouk L
free

10.4244/EIJV12I11A217 Dec 9, 2016
Radial access for acute coronary syndromes: case closed?
Capodanno D
free

Viewpoint

10.4244/EIJ-E-22-00009 May 15, 2022
Thirty years of transradial coronary interventions
Kiemeneij F et al
free

10.4244/EIJV8I11A191 Mar 22, 2013
EAPCI: Sharing experience together, the radial approach consensus
Fajadet J
free
Trending articles
69.996

10.4244/EIJV13I12A217 Dec 8, 2017
Swimming against the tide: insights from the ORBITA trial
Al-Lamee R and Francis D
free
69.95

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00386 Feb 3, 2025
Mechanical circulatory support for complex, high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention
Ferro E et al
free
59.8

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00066 Apr 21, 2025
Management of complications after valvular interventions
Bansal A et al
free
38.75

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00912 Oct 7, 2024
Optical coherence tomography to guide percutaneous coronary intervention
Almajid F et al
free
23.3

Expert Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00535 May 5, 2025
Catheter-based techniques for pulmonary embolism treatment
Costa F et al
X

The Official Journal of EuroPCR and the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI)

EuroPCR EAPCI
PCR ESC
Impact factor: 7.6
2023 Journal Citation Reports®
Science Edition (Clarivate Analytics, 2024)
Online ISSN 1969-6213 - Print ISSN 1774-024X
© 2005-2025 Europa Group - All rights reserved