Editorial

DOI: 10.4244/EIJ-E-25-00010

Defining what is important to prevent radial artery occlusion

Sunil V. Rao, MD; Louai Razzouk, MD, MPH

The use of transradial artery access (TRA) for diagnostic coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has steadily increased over the last two decades globally, becoming the recommended site of vascular access across the whole spectrum of coronary artery disease, with a reduction in major bleeding and vascular complications when compared with femoral access12. Radial artery occlusion (RAO) after transradial procedures varies widely from 0.8% to 30%, and is caused by trauma to the arterial wall, leading to changes in the endothelial function and neointimal hyperplasia, along with acute thrombus formation at the access site3. The use of distal transradial artery access (dTRA) might mitigate trauma to the proximal segment of the artery – a systematic review of over 9,000 patients demonstrated that dTRA is safe and feasible for coronary diagnostic and interventional procedures, with shorter haemostasis time and a lower incidence of any bleeding, RAO and pseudoaneurysm when compared with conventional TRA (cTRA)4. Patent haemostasis has been associated with a reduction in the rate of RAO5, and the PHARAOH study demonstrated that a provisional...

Sign in to read
the full article

Forgot your password?
No account yet?
Sign up for free!

Create my pcr account

Join us for free and access thousands of articles from EuroIntervention, as well as presentations, videos, cases from PCRonline.com

Volume 21 Number 7
Apr 7, 2025
Volume 21 Number 7
View full issue


Key metrics

Suggested by Cory

Viewpoint

10.4244/EIJ-E-22-00009 May 15, 2022
Thirty years of transradial coronary interventions
Kiemeneij F et al
free

Editorial

10.4244/EIJ-E-24-00030 Jul 15, 2024
Ultrasound is not the panacea for transfemoral access complications
Jolly S and d'Entremont M
free

Editorial

10.4244/EIJ-E-24-00030 May 14, 2024
Ultrasound is not the panacea for transfemoral access complications
Jolly S and d'Entremont M
free

10.4244/EIJV6I2A27 Jun 30, 2010
The radial approach: en route to routine?
Doganov A
free

10.4244/EIJV8I11A191 Mar 22, 2013
EAPCI: Sharing experience together, the radial approach consensus
Fajadet J
free

10.4244/EIJV12I11A217 Dec 9, 2016
Radial access for acute coronary syndromes: case closed?
Capodanno D
free
Trending articles
57.8

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00386 Feb 3, 2025
Mechanical circulatory support for complex, high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention
Ferro E et al
free
39.45

Clinical research

10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00725 Nov 19, 2023
A systematic algorithm for large-bore arterial access closure after TAVI: the TAVI-MultiCLOSE study
Rosseel L et al
free
39.45

Original Research

10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00725 Mar 18, 2024
A systematic algorithm for large-bore arterial access closure after TAVI: the TAVI-MultiCLOSE study
Rosseel L et al
free
36.25

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00448 Jan 15, 2024
Coronary spasm and vasomotor dysfunction as a cause of MINOCA
Yaker ZS et al
free
35.15

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00895 Apr 1, 2024
Percutaneous interventions for pulmonary embolism
Finocchiaro S et al
free
28.5

CLINICAL RESEARCH

10.4244/EIJV11I1A6 May 19, 2015
European expert consensus on rotational atherectomy
Barbato E et al
free
X

The Official Journal of EuroPCR and the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI)

EuroPCR EAPCI
PCR ESC
Impact factor: 7.6
2023 Journal Citation Reports®
Science Edition (Clarivate Analytics, 2024)
Online ISSN 1969-6213 - Print ISSN 1774-024X
© 2005-2025 Europa Group - All rights reserved