Expert review

The transradial versus the transfemoral approach for primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis

EuroIntervention 2012;8:501-510 published online ahead of print May 2012. DOI: 10.4244/EIJV8I4A78

Jae-Sik Jang
Jae-Sik Jang1*, MD, PhD; Han-Young Jin1, MD; Jeong-Sook Seo1, MD, PhD; Tae-Hyun Yang1, MD, PhD; Dae-Kyeong Kim1, MD, PhD; Dong-Kie Kim2, MD; Doo-Il Kim2, MD, PhD; Kyoung-Im Cho3, MD, PhD; Bo-Hyun Kim4, MD, PhD; Yong Hyun Park5, MD, PhD; Hyung-Gon Je6, MD, PhD; Dong-Soo Kim1, MD, PhD
1. Department of Cardiology, Busan Paik Hospital, University of Inje College of Medicine, Busan, Korea; 2. Department of Cardiology, Haeundae Paik Hospital, Busan, Korea; 3. Department of Cardiology, Maryknoll Medical Center, Busan, Kor

Aims: There is an increasing amount of data suggesting that transradial approach is associated with lower incidence of complications in vascular

Sign in to read and download the full article

Forgot your password?

No account yet?
Sign up for free!

Create my pcr account

Join us for free and access thousands of articles from EuroIntervention, as well as presentations, videos, cases from

primary angioplastystemicoronary artery disease
Read next article
Non-invasive fractional flow reserve: scientific basis, methods and perspectives

Latest news